FP1 4.2 - Foci, directrices and eccentricity

FP1 4.2 - Foci, directrices and eccentricity

Describe a conic using the ratio of distances from a focus and a directrix. You will connect eccentricity with the Cartesian parameters, find foci and directrices, and use shared geometric information to determine unknown conics.

One distance ratio creates three kinds of conic

An ellipse has equation x2/25+y2/16=1x^2/25+y^2/16=1. A hyperbola has the same foci and the reciprocal eccentricity. Can you find its two parameters without starting with simultaneous equations? The foci provide the useful shortcut; we will find a=9/5, b=12/5a=9/5,\ b=12/5.

You already know

Recognise the standard Cartesian and parametric conics from FP1 4.1. The distance between two points uses the square root of the sum of squared coordinate differences. A distance to a line is perpendicular: to x=dx=d it is ∣x−d∣|x-d|, and to x+y=dx+y=d it is ∣x+y−d∣/2|x+y-d|/\sqrt2.

Fix a point FF, called the focus, and a line ll, called the directrix, with FF not on ll. For a point PP, let DD be the foot of the perpendicular from PP to ll. The focus-directrix property is

PF=e PDPF=e\,PD

The positive constant ee is the eccentricity. The ratio uses ordinary non-negative distances, not signed horizontal displacements.

Eccentricity and conic type

For the non-degenerate focus-directrix conics,

PFPD=e,{0<e<1ellipsee=1parabolae>1hyperbola\frac{PF}{PD}=e,\qquad \begin{cases} 0<e<1&\text{ellipse}\\ e=1&\text{parabola}\\ e>1&\text{hyperbola} \end{cases}

The printed table gives these types and their parameter relations. A circle is the limiting ellipse with e=0e=0; it has no finite directrix in this description.

In the formula booklet.

An ellipse or hyperbola has two corresponding focus-directrix pairs. Use one pair consistently: the positive focus goes with the positive directrix in the horizontal standard form. Do not measure to whichever focus or line happens to be nearest.

Key idea

Fix one focus and its corresponding directrix. The conic consists of points with the same non-negative distance ratio PF/PD=ePF/PD=e, using perpendicular distance for PDPD.

Check the chosen focus-directrix pair geometrically before calculating either distance.

[DIAGRAM: asset_name: Perpendicular distance to an ellipse directrix; asset_slug: 9fm0-fp171-focus-distance; caption: Eccentricity compares a focus distance with a perpendicular line distance; description: An equal-scale graph shows the ellipse x squared over 25 plus y squared over 9 equals 1, its right focus F at (4,0), and the vertical directrix x equals 25 over 4. The point P is (3,12 over 5) and its perpendicular foot D is (25 over 4,12 over 5). A blue segment PF and a sage horizontal segment PD are shown with a right-angle marker at D. A separate side panel gives PF equals 13 over 5, PD equals 13 over 4, and PF over PD equals 4 over 5. All distance labels are outside the curve.]
Eccentricity compares a focus distance with a perpendicular line distance

Watch out

Wrong: take ee to be the distance between the foci. Right: eccentricity is a dimensionless ratio. Enlarging a conic changes its lengths but not its eccentricity.

Use the ratio definition directly.

Equal distances give the parabola

For focus F=(a,0)F=(a,0) and directrix x=−ax=-a, the property PF=PDPF=PD gives

(x−a)2+y2=∣x+a∣two distances(x−a)2+y2=(x+a)2square non-negative quantitiesy2=4axexpand and cancel\begin{aligned} \sqrt{(x-a)^2+y^2}&=|x+a| && \text{two distances}\\ (x-a)^2+y^2&=(x+a)^2 && \text{square non-negative quantities}\\ y^2&=4ax && \text{expand and cancel} \end{aligned}

Conversely, this equation gives the squared distance equality, and non-negative square roots recover the original distance equality. No extra branch is introduced.

Parabola geometry

For y2=4axy^2=4ax, where a>0a>0, the focus is (a,0)(a,0), the directrix is x=−ax=-a and e=1e=1. The vertex is halfway between the focus and directrix along the symmetry axis.

In the formula booklet.

The focus and directrix are on opposite sides of the vertex.

Worked example 1: an equation from equal distances

Question. Find the locus of points equidistant from F=(2,0)F=(2,0) and the line x=−2x=-2, identifying the curve.

Plan. Set the point distance equal to the perpendicular line distance and square.

(x−2)2+y2=∣x+2∣e=1(x−2)2+y2=(x+2)2both sides non-negativey2=8xcancel the matching terms\begin{aligned} \sqrt{(x-2)^2+y^2}&=|x+2| && e=1\\ (x-2)^2+y^2&=(x+2)^2 && \text{both sides non-negative}\\ y^2&=8x && \text{cancel the matching terms} \end{aligned}

Why this step? The distance to the vertical line is ∣x+2∣|x+2|, independent of yy. Using a sloping distance to a point on the line would describe a different locus.

Answer. The parabola y2=8xy^2=8x, with vertex (0,0)(0,0), focus (2,0)(2,0), directrix x=−2x=-2, eccentricity 11.

Check. At (2,4)(2,4), the focus distance is 44 and the line distance is 44.

Change only the common focus/directrix scale from 22 to 33.

Worked example 2: a wider distance scale

Question. Find the locus equidistant from F=(3,0)F=(3,0) and x=−3x=-3.

Plan. Use the same equality with the new positions.

(x−3)2+y2=(x+3)2squared distance equalityy2=12xexpand and subtract\begin{aligned} (x-3)^2+y^2&=(x+3)^2 && \text{squared distance equality}\\ y^2&=12x && \text{expand and subtract} \end{aligned}

Why this step? The eccentricity remains 11 because the distances remain equal; changing the scale does not change the type.

Answer. y2=12xy^2=12x, a parabola with focus (3,0)(3,0) and directrix x=−3x=-3.

Check. Its point (3,6)(3,6) is 66 units from both the focus and the line.

The printed geometry also works after translating or interchanging coordinates. For example, (y−k)2=4a(x−h)(y-k)^2=4a(x-h) has focus (h+a,k)(h+a,k) and directrix x=h−ax=h-a; these translated forms follow by moving the whole picture.

Watch out

Wrong: the focus of y2=12xy^2=12x is (12,0)(12,0). Right: compare with 4ax4ax; the focus is (3,0)(3,0).

Change the distance scale once more.

Ellipse geometry from its semiaxes

For a horizontal major axis, take a>b>0a>b>0. The ellipse relation is b2=a2(1−e2)b^2=a^2(1-e^2), so its eccentricity is the positive square root e=1−b2/a2e=\sqrt{1-b^2/a^2}.

To see the focus-directrix property, choose F=(ae,0)F=(ae,0) and x=a/ex=a/e. The equation PF2=e2PD2PF^2=e^2PD^2 becomes

(x−ae)2+y2=e2(x−a/e)2(1−e2)x2+y2=a2(1−e2)x2a2+y2a2(1−e2)=1\begin{aligned} (x-ae)^2+y^2&=e^2(x-a/e)^2\\ (1-e^2)x^2+y^2&=a^2(1-e^2)\\ \frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{a^2(1-e^2)}&=1 \end{aligned}

Thus the denominator of y2y^2 is exactly b2b^2. Since distances and ee are non-negative, the squared relation is equivalent to PF=ePDPF=ePD.

Horizontal ellipse geometry

For x2/a2+y2/b2=1x^2/a^2+y^2/b^2=1, with a>b>0a>b>0,

b2=a2(1−e2),0<e<1,F=(±ae,0),x=±aeb^2=a^2(1-e^2),\quad 0<e<1,\qquad F=(\pm ae,0),\qquad x=\pm\frac ae

The two foci lie inside the ellipse; the two directrices lie outside it. If the major axis is vertical, interchange the coordinate roles before applying the formulas.

In the formula booklet.

Work with e2e^2 until the final positive square root. The symbol ee denotes a ratio, so it has no negative alternative.

Worked example 3: a rational eccentricity

Question. Find the eccentricity, foci and directrices of x2/25+y2/16=1x^2/25+y^2/16=1.

Plan. Read a=5,b=4a=5,b=4, calculate ee, then use aeae and a/ea/e for different purposes.

e2=1−1625=925ellipse relatione=35,ae=3,ae=253positive ratio\begin{aligned} e^2&=1-\frac{16}{25}=\frac9{25} && \text{ellipse relation}\\ e&=\frac35,\qquad ae=3,\qquad \frac ae=\frac{25}3 && \text{positive ratio} \end{aligned}

Why this step? Multiplication gives the focus position, while division gives the directrix position. They are not interchangeable.

Answer. e=3/5e=3/5; foci (±3,0)(\pm3,0); directrices x=±25/3x=\pm25/3.

Check. 3<5<25/33<5<25/3: each positive focus is inside its positive vertex and the corresponding directrix is beyond it.

Change only the vertical semiaxis from 44 to 33.

Worked example 4: the foci move outwards

Question. Find the eccentricity, foci and directrices of x2/25+y2/9=1x^2/25+y^2/9=1.

Plan. Use the new b2b^2, keeping a=5a=5.

e2=1−925=1625changed vertical scalee=45,ae=4,ae=254geometry\begin{aligned} e^2&=1-\frac9{25}=\frac{16}{25} && \text{changed vertical scale}\\ e&=\frac45,\qquad ae=4,\qquad \frac ae=\frac{25}4 && \text{geometry} \end{aligned}

Why this step? Reducing the vertical semiaxis with fixed horizontal semiaxis increases ee, so the foci move towards the vertices.

Answer. e=4/5e=4/5; foci (±4,0)(\pm4,0); directrices x=±25/4x=\pm25/4.

Check. For P=(3,12/5)P=(3,12/5), PF=13/5PF=13/5 and PD=13/4PD=13/4 for the positive pair; the ratio is 4/54/5, as in the diagram.

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account