CP 1.1 - Induction for divisibility

CP 1.1 - Induction for divisibility

Divisibility proofs let you say something exact about numbers far too large to write down. You will use the induction structure you already know, express the assumed case as an integer multiple and rearrange the next case until that multiple appears.

What a divisibility assumption means

Is the integer consisting of 20252025 nines divisible by 3737? You could start dividing, but the smaller cases suggest a much shorter route:

999=37×27999 999=37×27 027999=37\times27 \qquad 999\,999=37\times27\,027

In fact, an integer made entirely of nines is divisible by 3737 whenever its number of digits is a positive multiple of 33. We will prove that fact at the end. Its enormous size is a distraction: what matters is how another block of three nines is attached.

You already know

Induction checks a starting case, assumes a statement at one arbitrary integer kk and proves the case k+1k+1. From A-level Mathematics, factorisation rewrites an expression without changing it; for example, 9x+18=9(x+2)9x+18=9(x+2).

For divisibility, the phrase “is a multiple of” needs an integer quotient. For instance, 18=6×318=6\times3 proves that 1818 is divisible by 66, whereas 19=6×(19/6)19=6\times(19/6) says nothing useful about divisibility.

Divisibility

For integers aa and dd, with d≠0d\ne0, aa is divisible by dd if a=dma=dm for some integer mm. For example, 0=7×00=7\times0 and −21=7×(−3)-21=7\times(-3) are divisible by 77. The number 2222 is not divisible by 77.

If the claim is that f(n)f(n) is divisible by dd, assume f(k)=dmf(k)=dm for an integer mm. Keep kk for the index and mm for the quotient: they have different jobs. The next quotient can be a different integer.

Integer combinations preserve divisibility

If a=dma=dm and b=dqb=dq, where d,m,qd,m,q are integers and d≠0d\ne0, then for integers u,vu,v:

ua+vb=d(um+vq)ua+vb=d(um+vq)

Thus every integer combination of multiples of dd is another multiple of dd.

Not in the formula booklet: learn it.

For an inductive step, this gives a useful target: express f(k+1)f(k+1) as an integer times f(k)f(k), together with another visible multiple of dd. The assumed divisibility then transfers to the next case.

Key idea

The index says which case you are considering; the integer quotient says why that case is divisible. Assuming f(k)=dmf(k)=dm lets the quotient change as the proof advances.

This distinction is the first thing to check in a divisibility proof.

Rewriting a power using the assumed case

A power has a simple connection to its next indexed case: use the laws of indices to separate the new factor, then rebuild the entire assumed expression inside a bracket.

For 32n3^{2n}, increasing nn by 11 adds 22 to the exponent, so

32(k+1)=32k+2=9×32k3^{2(k+1)}=3^{2k+2}=9\times3^{2k}

The multiplier is 99, not 33. That small bookkeeping decision determines the rest of the proof.

Advancing an indexed power

For a non-zero real number aa, integer constants p,qp,q and integer kk:

ap(k+1)+q=apapk+qa^{p(k+1)+q}=a^p a^{pk+q}

Not in the formula booklet: learn it.

The constant outside the power must also be accounted for. Multiplying the whole assumed expression changes that constant, so add or subtract a correction to preserve equality.

Worked example 1: a power minus one

Question. Prove by induction that 32n−13^{2n}-1 is divisible by 88 for all positive integers nn.

Plan. Check n=1n=1, assume 32k−1=8m3^{2k}-1=8m and rewrite the next case using nine times the whole assumed expression.

At n=1n=1,

32−1=8=8×13^2-1=8=8\times1

so the result is true for n=1n=1.

Assume 32k−1=8m3^{2k}-1=8m for an integer mm, where kk is an arbitrary positive integer. Then

32(k+1)−1=9×32k−1separate the new factor=9(32k−1)+8expose the assumed expression=9(8m)+8use the assumption=8(9m+1)factor out 8\begin{aligned} 3^{2(k+1)}-1 &=9\times3^{2k}-1 &&\text{separate the new factor}\\ &=9(3^{2k}-1)+8 &&\text{expose the assumed expression}\\ &=9(8m)+8 &&\text{use the assumption}\\ &=8(9m+1) &&\text{factor out }8 \end{aligned}

Why this step? Nine times 32k−13^{2k}-1 has a constant term of −9-9. Adding 88 restores the required constant −1-1.

Answer. Since 9m+19m+1 is an integer, truth for n=kn=k implies truth for n=k+1n=k+1. The result is true for n=1n=1, so it holds for all positive integers nn, by induction.

Check. At n=2n=2, 34−1=80=8×103^4-1=80=8\times10. The next quotient after m=1m=1 is 9(1)+1=109(1)+1=10.

Worked example 2 changes just the added constant, from −1-1 to 77. The power still advances by a factor of 99, but the correction term changes sign.

Worked example 2: correcting the constant

Question. Prove by induction that 32n+73^{2n}+7 is divisible by 88 for all positive integers nn.

Plan. Check the first case, assume 32k+7=8m3^{2k}+7=8m and compare the next expression with nine times that assumption.

At n=1n=1,

32+7=16=8×23^2+7=16=8\times2

so the result is true for n=1n=1.

Assume 32k+7=8m3^{2k}+7=8m for some integer mm, where k≥1k\ge1 is an arbitrary integer. Then

32(k+1)+7=9×32k+7advance the power=9(32k+7)−56correct the constant=9(8m)−56use the assumption=8(9m−7)factor out 8\begin{aligned} 3^{2(k+1)}+7 &=9\times3^{2k}+7 &&\text{advance the power}\\ &=9(3^{2k}+7)-56 &&\text{correct the constant}\\ &=9(8m)-56 &&\text{use the assumption}\\ &=8(9m-7) &&\text{factor out }8 \end{aligned}

Why this step? The bracket contributes 6363, but the required constant is 77. Subtracting 5656, itself a multiple of 88, fixes the difference.

Answer. The quantity 9m−79m-7 is an integer, so truth for n=kn=k implies truth for n=k+1n=k+1. Since the result is true for n=1n=1, it is true for all positive integers nn, by induction.

Check. At n=2n=2, 34+7=88=8×113^4+7=88=8\times11, and the quotient rule gives 9(2)−7=119(2)-7=11.

Neither divisibility statement is in the formula booklet: prove it when asked. The point to learn is the rearrangement, which makes the assumed multiple visible.

Watch out

Wrong: 9×32k+7=9(32k+7)9\times3^{2k}+7=9(3^{2k}+7). The right side has constant term 6363, not 77. Right: 9×32k+7=9(32k+7)−569\times3^{2k}+7=9(3^{2k}+7)-56. Expand your bracket once to check the correction.

Showing that a bracket is integer-valued completes the divisibility step. You must then connect that step to the checked starting case in your conclusion.

Exam tip

State “If true for n=kn=k, then true for n=k+1n=k+1”. Follow it with the base case and the stated domain. The two cases are linked by your argument; listing them as separate true statements loses that logic.

The following question changes the constant once more. Keep the whole assumed expression together when multiplying by 99.

Combining powers with different multipliers

When two powers advance by different factors, choose one multiplier for the entire assumed expression and collect the mismatch as a separate term.

For 52n5^{2n} the next multiplier is 2525; for 24n2^{4n} it is 1616. Their difference is 99, which is promising if the required divisor is 99. Either multiplier can work; choose the one that leaves the cleaner correction.

Worked example 3: a difference of powers

Question. Prove by induction that 52n−24n5^{2n}-2^{4n} is divisible by 99 for all positive integers nn.

Plan. Check the first case, assume the difference is 9m9m and compare the next case with 1616 times the assumed difference.

At n=1n=1,

52−24=25−16=9=9×15^2-2^4=25-16=9=9\times1

so the result is true for n=1n=1.

Assume 52k−24k=9m5^{2k}-2^{4k}=9m for an integer mm, where kk is an arbitrary positive integer. Then

52(k+1)−24(k+1)=25×52k−16×24kadvance both powers=16(52k−24k)+9×52k25=16+9=16(9m)+9×52kuse the assumption=9(16m+52k)factor out 9\begin{aligned} 5^{2(k+1)}-2^{4(k+1)} &=25\times5^{2k}-16\times2^{4k} &&\text{advance both powers}\\ &=16(5^{2k}-2^{4k})+9\times5^{2k} &&25=16+9\\ &=16(9m)+9\times5^{2k} &&\text{use the assumption}\\ &=9(16m+5^{2k}) &&\text{factor out }9 \end{aligned}

Why this step? Multiplying the whole difference by 1616 matches the second power exactly. The unmatched part of the first power is a multiple of 25−16=925-16=9.

Answer. Since 16m+52k16m+5^{2k} is an integer, truth for n=kn=k implies truth for n=k+1n=k+1. The result is true for n=1n=1, so it holds for every positive integer nn, by induction.

Check. At n=2n=2, 625−256=369=9×41625-256=369=9\times41, and 16(1)+25=4116(1)+25=41.

Worked example 4 changes the coefficient of the second power from −1-1 to 88. Multiplying by 1616 still matches that entire second term; the same simple correction survives.

Worked example 4: a sum of two powers

Question. Prove by induction that 52n+8×24n5^{2n}+8\times2^{4n} is divisible by 99 for all positive integers nn.

Plan. Verify the new base case, then multiply the whole assumed expression by 1616 and collect the remaining multiple of 99.

At n=1n=1,

52+8×24=25+128=153=9×175^2+8\times2^4=25+128=153=9\times17

so the result is true for n=1n=1.

Assume 52k+8×24k=9m5^{2k}+8\times2^{4k}=9m for an integer mm, where kk is an arbitrary positive integer. Then

52(k+1)+8×24(k+1)=25×52k+128×24kadvance both powers=16(52k+8×24k)+9×52kexpose the entire assumption=16(9m)+9×52kuse the assumption=9(16m+52k)an integer multiple of 9\begin{aligned} 5^{2(k+1)}+8\times2^{4(k+1)} &=25\times5^{2k}+128\times2^{4k} &&\text{advance both powers}\\ &=16(5^{2k}+8\times2^{4k})+9\times5^{2k} &&\text{expose the entire assumption}\\ &=16(9m)+9\times5^{2k} &&\text{use the assumption}\\ &=9(16m+5^{2k}) &&\text{an integer multiple of }9 \end{aligned}

Why this step? Keeping the coefficient 88 inside the bracket lets 1616 account for the entire second term. Only the mismatch in the first power needs correcting.

Answer. Truth for n=kn=k implies truth for n=k+1n=k+1, because 16m+52k16m+5^{2k} is an integer. The result is true for n=1n=1, so it is true for all positive integers nn, by induction.

Check. At n=2n=2, 625+8(256)=2673=9×297625+8(256)=2673=9\times297. The quotient rule gives 16(17)+25=29716(17)+25=297.

These two-power divisibility results are not in the formula booklet: derive them when asked. You need no new theorem, only the correct multipliers and an exact rearrangement.

Watch out

Wrong: 52(k+1)+8×24(k+1)=25(52k+8×24k)5^{2(k+1)}+8\times2^{4(k+1)}=25(5^{2k}+8\times2^{4k}). The two powers advance by different factors. Right: use one multiplier for the whole expression and include the mismatch explicitly, as in Worked example 4.

Return to the nines puzzle. Let Nn=103n−1N_n=10^{3n}-1, the integer with 3n3n nines. Its first case is N1=999=37×27N_1=999=37\times27. Assuming Nk=37mN_k=37m for integer mm,

Nk+1=1000×103k−1=1000(103k−1)+999=37(1000m+27)\begin{aligned} N_{k+1} &=1000\times10^{3k}-1\\ &=1000(10^{3k}-1)+999\\ &=37(1000m+27) \end{aligned}

The bracket is an integer. Thus truth for kk implies truth for k+1k+1; with the checked case 11, induction proves divisibility for every positive integer nn. Since 2025=3×6752025=3\times675, the opening integer is N675N_{675}, so it is divisible by 3737. This result is not in the formula booklet; the proof explains it.

The next question changes the coefficient again. Make the assumed expression appear intact before using its divisibility.

Quick Recap

  • Assume an integer multiple dmdm; the quotient mm need not equal the index kk.
  • Use the laws of indices to find the multiplier for each power.
  • Rearrange the next case to expose the entire assumed expression and a visible multiple of the divisor.
  • State why the new quotient is an integer, then connect the implication and base case to the whole domain.

The integer with 20252025 nines is divisible by 3737: every block of three more nines preserves that divisibility.