C1.1; E1.1 - Prime factorisation

C1.1; E1.1 - Prime factorisation

Different factor pairs can lead to the same set of prime building blocks. You will break a positive integer into prime factors using a tree or repeated division, then write repeated factors compactly using powers.

Prime factors from a factor tree

If one person starts 7272 as 8×98\times9 and another starts it as 6×126\times12, will they finish with different prime factors? The starting choices differ, but both routes must preserve the product at every step.

You already know

A prime number has exactly two distinct positive factors. A factor pair multiplies to the original number. For example, 8×9=728\times9=72, but neither 88 nor 99 is prime.

A factor tree splits a number into a factor pair. Each composite factor splits again; a prime is a stopping point. Use pairs greater than 11, so that each split makes the numbers smaller. The final numbers at the branch ends multiply to the starting number because every split replaces a number by an equal product.

Product of prime factors

A product of prime factors writes an integer greater than 11 as prime numbers multiplied together. Every factor in the final product must be prime. For example, 18=2×3×318=2\times3\times3; 18=2×918=2\times9 is an equal product, but is not yet a product of prime factors.

[DIAGRAM: asset_name: Two factor trees for seventy-two; asset_slug: two_factor_trees; caption: Different first splits give the same prime factors, including repeated copies.; description: Two exact factor trees for seventy-two. The left splits into eight and nine, then eight into two and four, four into two and two, and nine into three and three. The right splits into six and twelve, six into two and three, twelve into three and four, and four into two and two. Prime branch ends are highlighted in pale green. Each tree yields three twos and two threes.]
Different first splits give the same prime factors, including repeated copies.

Worked example 1: starting with eight times nine

Question. Express 7272 as a product of prime factors, starting with 8×98\times9.

Plan. Split each composite branch until every branch end is prime.

72=8×9the chosen first split=(2×4)×(3×3)split both composites=2×2×2×3×3split 4; all ends are prime\begin{aligned} 72&=8\times9 && \text{the chosen first split}\\ &=(2\times4)\times(3\times3) && \text{split both composites}\\ &=2\times2\times2\times3\times3 && \text{split 4; all ends are prime} \end{aligned}

Answer. 72=2×2×2×3×372=2\times2\times2\times3\times3.

Check. 2×2×2=82\times2\times2=8 and 3×3=93\times3=9, so the final product is 8×9=728\times9=72. Each of 22 and 33 is prime.

Keep 7272 and change only the first split. This checks whether the result depends on your starting choice.

Worked example 2: starting with six times twelve

Question. Express 7272 as a product of prime factors, starting with 6×126\times12.

Plan. Split 66 and 1212, and continue until only prime branch ends remain.

72=6×12a different first split=(2×3)×(3×4)split both composites=2×3×3×2×2split the remaining 4=2×2×2×3×3reorder the factors\begin{aligned} 72&=6\times12 && \text{a different first split}\\ &=(2\times3)\times(3\times4) && \text{split both composites}\\ &=2\times3\times3\times2\times2 && \text{split the remaining 4}\\ &=2\times2\times2\times3\times3 && \text{reorder the factors} \end{aligned}

Answer. 72=2×2×2×3×372=2\times2\times2\times3\times3, the same prime factors as before.

Check. Group the factors another way: (2×3)×(2×3)×2=6×6×2=72(2\times3)\times(2\times3)\times2=6\times6\times2=72.

This agreement is a general property: for an integer greater than 11, a complete prime factorisation is unique apart from the order of its factors. A prime such as 1717 already has a one-factor prime factorisation, 1717. The number 11 has no prime factors; do not put 11 at the end of a prime-factor product.

Watch out

Do not multiply every number written in the tree. Intermediate numbers such as 88, 99 and 44 have already been replaced by their branches. Read only the prime branch ends, including every repeated copy.

Repeated division into primes

You can find prime factors without drawing a branching tree. Divide by a prime factor, keep that prime, then divide the quotient again. Stop when the quotient becomes 11. This builds a single chain of exact divisions.

Start with the smallest suitable prime. If 22 divides the current number exactly, use it and test 22 again. Once 22 no longer divides, try 33, then 55, then the next primes as needed. Skipping 44 is safe: any number divisible by 44 would already be divisible by 22.

Worked example 3: keeping a divisor while it still works

Question. Express 8484 as a product of prime factors using repeated division.

Plan. Divide by the smallest prime available at each stage, recording every divisor.

84÷2=42record one factor of 242÷2=212 still divides exactly21÷3=721 is odd; try 37÷7=17 is prime; finish\begin{aligned} 84\div2&=42 && \text{record one factor of 2}\\ 42\div2&=21 && \text{2 still divides exactly}\\ 21\div3&=7 && \text{21 is odd; try 3}\\ 7\div7&=1 && \text{7 is prime; finish} \end{aligned}

Answer. 84=2×2×3×784=2\times2\times3\times7.

Check. Rebuild in reverse: 1×7=71\times7=7, then 7×3=217\times3=21, 21×2=4221\times2=42, and 42×2=8442\times2=84.

Change the starting value to 126126. The first quotient is now odd, so keeping 22 as the next divisor would fail.

Worked example 4: moving to the next prime

Question. Express 126126 as a product of prime factors using repeated division.

Plan. Use 22 once, then choose primes that divide each new quotient exactly.

126÷2=63record 263÷3=2163 is odd; record 321÷3=73 still divides exactly7÷7=1record 7 and finish\begin{aligned} 126\div2&=63 && \text{record 2}\\ 63\div3&=21 && \text{63 is odd; record 3}\\ 21\div3&=7 && \text{3 still divides exactly}\\ 7\div7&=1 && \text{record 7 and finish} \end{aligned}

Answer. 126=2×3×3×7126=2\times3\times3\times7.

Check. 2×7=142\times7=14 and 3×3=93\times3=9, giving 14×9=12614\times9=126.

Why keep the divisors? Each line says the number before division equals the prime divisor times the next number. Reading back through the chain multiplies all the saved primes by the final 11, reconstructing the original integer.

Watch out

A quotient in the middle of the chain need not be prime. The divisors you record must be prime. For example, dividing 8484 by 44 is exact, but you would still need to replace 44 by 2×22\times2.

Writing repeated prime factors as powers

Repeated factors can be shortened without changing their meaning. For example, 2×2×22\times2\times2 can be written 232^3. The small raised 33 counts three factors of 22; it does not mean 2×32\times3.

Power notation

In a power such as 232^3, the base is 22 and the index is 33. A positive whole-number index tells you how many copies of the base are multiplied together. Thus 23=2×2×2=82^3=2\times2\times2=8, and 32=3×3=93^2=3\times3=9.

For a prime factorisation, collect equal primes together and count their copies. A prime used once is normally written without an index: write 55, rather than 515^1. This is only a compact record of repeated multiplication; you do not need rules for combining general powers yet.

Worked example 5: counting repeated copies

Question. Write 2×2×2×3×32\times2\times2\times3\times3 using powers, and work out its value.

Plan. Count the copies of each prime, then evaluate each repeated product.

2×2×2×3×3=23×32three twos and two threes=8×9evaluate the powers=72multiply\begin{aligned} 2\times2\times2\times3\times3&=2^3\times3^2 && \text{three twos and two threes}\\ &=8\times9 && \text{evaluate the powers}\\ &=72 && \text{multiply} \end{aligned}

Answer. 23×32=722^3\times3^2=72.

Check. Expand the powers again: (2×2×2)(3×3)(2\times2\times2)(3\times3). There are exactly the original five prime factors.

Replace one factor of 22 by a factor of 33. The number of factors stays five, but the two indices change.

Worked example 6: changing one prime factor

Question. Write 2×2×3×3×32\times2\times3\times3\times3 using powers, and work out its value.

Plan. Recount each prime instead of keeping the indices from the previous example.

2×2×3×3×3=22×33two twos and three threes=4×27evaluate the powers=108multiply\begin{aligned} 2\times2\times3\times3\times3&=2^2\times3^3 && \text{two twos and three threes}\\ &=4\times27 && \text{evaluate the powers}\\ &=108 && \text{multiply} \end{aligned}

Answer. 22×33=1082^2\times3^3=108.

Check. Replacing one 22 in the previous product by 33 divides its value by 22, then multiplies by 33: 72÷2×3=36×3=10872\div2\times3=36\times3=108.

The opening factor trees both finish at 23×322^3\times3^2. You can choose the first split to make the arithmetic convenient, then use the prime product to check the result. In the next lesson, keeping track of repeated copies will help you find common factors and common multiples.

Watch out

23≠2×32^3\ne2\times3: the left side is 88, while the right side is 66. The index counts factors, not equal groups being added.

Quick Recap

  • Split composite factors until every branch end is prime.
  • Different valid factor trees give the same prime factors, apart from their order.
  • Repeated division records the prime divisors and ends at 11.
  • A positive whole-number index counts repeated factors: 232^3 means three factors of 22.

The two starting routes for 7272 agree: each gives 2×2×2×3×3=23×322\times2\times2\times3\times3=2^3\times3^2.