8.01a, 8.01b - Recurrence relations and induction
Describe a sequence either by a rule that produces the next term or by a formula that goes straight to a chosen position. In 8.01a you will move between these descriptions and handle starting indices carefully; in 8.01b you will use induction to prove formulae for sequences and their sums.
Reading a recurrence system
Start at , double the current number and add : the numbers begin . Can you find the term in position without writing all the intervening terms, and prove that your shortcut always works?
A rule that looks backwards is easy to run forwards. It needs a starting value, though: “double and add ” could equally start . The same rule does not mean the same sequence.
You already know
A sequence has an integer index, and a series adds sequence terms. Induction proves a base case and then the implication from an arbitrary case to case ; checking several terms is not a proof.
Write for a sequence. The braces here indicate an indexed sequence, so order and repeated values matter. The sequence is not the same object as a set of distinct values.
Recurrence relation and recurrence system
A recurrence relation defines a term using earlier terms. A recurrence system gives the relation, the initial condition or conditions, and the allowed values of the index. For example,
defines the opening sequence. The relation alone does not specify its starting point. A sequence may instead start with ; a zeroth term is not compulsory.
For , replace every in the right-hand side by the current index. If that side contains explicitly, the value changes from step to step.
Worked example 1: generating terms from a zeroth term
Question. Given and for , find and .
Plan. Use in order, carrying each new term into the next calculation.
Why this step? The first update uses , because it produces from .
Answer. .
Check. , the index used in the final update.
The next example changes only where the sequence starts. The first permitted update now uses , so the added term is no longer zero.
Worked example 2: generating terms from a first term
Question. Given and for , find and .
Plan. Begin at the first allowed index, then update successively.
Why this step? An initial value of in position does not play the same role as in position when the rule contains the index.
Answer. .
Check. , as required.
A rule may use several preceding terms. For instance, needs two consecutive initial terms to run forwards; knowing only leaves free. All particular recurrence rules and term calculations in this part are not in the formula booklet: interpret the rule supplied.
Watch out
Wrong: the first update of , with , is . Right: use to get . The subscript on the new term is one more than the index substituted on the right.
Keep an index column beside your working when the added term depends on .
Position-to-term rules
A closed form replaces the whole chain of updates by a direct calculation from the position.
Closed form
A closed form, or position-to-term formula, gives without requiring earlier terms. For example, for gives . The rule is a recurrence, not a closed form, because it still uses .
To obtain a recurrence from a closed form, compare with . Differences often expose a polynomial pattern; a constant multiplier often exposes an exponential one. This is algebra, not guessing from a short list.
Worked example 3: a closed form gives a recurrence
Question. The sequence is defined for . Find and express in terms of and , including the initial condition.
Plan. Substitute , then subtract the expressions at two successive indices.
Why this step? Subtracting cancels the quadratic term, leaving exactly the amount added at each update.
Answer. , and for .
Check. The recurrence gives and , agreeing with the closed form.
The next example changes the closed form from a polynomial to an exponential. A multiple of the old term, rather than its simple difference, now cancels the changing part.
Worked example 4: an exponential closed form
Question. The sequence is defined for . Find and a recurrence system for .
Plan. Compare with , since increasing the index multiplies by .
Why this step? The factor matches the exponential growth; the extra repairs the constant term.
Answer. , and for .
Check. The closed form gives ; the recurrence gives , then .
Neither conversion result is in the formula booklet: derive it from the given formula. Notice that two sequences can have the same update rule but different closed forms because their initial conditions differ.
Watch out
Wrong: . Right: expand the whole square to get . Increasing a subscript does not add to the value.
A direct formula is useful only when it describes the entire specified sequence. The next part supplies the proof.
Proving sequence formulae
A proposed closed form must match both the initial condition and the recurrence. Induction makes those two checks prove every term.
Return to the opening sequence. Adding to each displayed term gives , suggesting . That pattern suggests the formula; the recurrence proves it.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account