6.01a - Proof with algebra
Algebra can explain patterns for every integer, including ones you could never finish checking. Represent integers precisely, prove divisibility and parity claims, and judge whether a chain of reasoning really establishes its conclusion.
Higher only.
Representing general integers
Subtract the square of an integer from the square of the next integer: , , . Must the result always be odd? Before proving it, we need symbols that represent every allowed pair, rather than just those three pairs.
An integer can be negative, zero or positive. Let be an integer. Its next integer is , so three consecutive integers can be represented by . Consecutive means there are no integers missing between them.
Even and odd integers
An even integer is a multiple of 2, so it can be written as , where is an integer. An odd integer is one more than an even integer, so it can be written as . These forms include negative numbers and zero where appropriate: zero is even, and is odd.
Consecutive even integers differ by 2, so use . Consecutive odd integers also differ by 2: . The integer condition is essential; if , then would be 1 and would not represent an even integer.
Worked example 1: three consecutive integers
Question. Represent three consecutive integers and simplify their sum.
Plan. Start at an unspecified integer and increase by one each time.
Answer. The three integers are ; their sum is , for integer .
Check. With , the numbers are . Their sum is , matching .
Now restrict the numbers to consecutive even integers. Only that condition changes, but the step must become 2.
Worked example 2: three consecutive even integers
Question. Represent three consecutive even integers and simplify their sum.
Plan. Start with , for integer , and increase by two each time.
Answer. The integers are ; their sum is .
Check. With , the numbers are , whose sum is . The expression gives . No even integer has been skipped.
Use different letters for unrelated integers: two arbitrary odd integers are and , for integers . Writing twice would force them to be equal; writing and would force them to be consecutive odd integers. Choose a representation that matches exactly the given condition.
Watch out
are not necessarily even: gives three odd integers. Use , with an integer, to guarantee evenness.
Change the parity while keeping the spacing correct.
Proving divisibility and parity
A divisibility proof aims for a multiple, with an integer multiplying it.
To show an expression is divisible by 4, rewrite it as . Merely showing a factor of 2 would prove evenness, but not divisibility by 4. To show oddness, reach . This final interpretation connects the algebra to the claim.
Worked example 3: the difference between neighbouring squares
Question. Prove that the square of an integer minus the square of the preceding integer is always odd.
Plan. Represent the consecutive integers by and , then subtract the earlier integer's square from the later integer's square.
Answer. Since is an integer, is odd. Thus the difference is odd for every pair of consecutive integers, including negative ones.
Check. For the pair , the difference in the stated order is , which is odd. The result can be negative; oddness does not mean positivity.
Change only the gap between the integers, from 1 to 2. The same expansion now exposes a factor of 4.
Worked example 4: squares of integers two apart
Question. Prove that is divisible by 4 for every integer .
Plan. Expand the changed square and factorise the difference.
Answer. is an integer, so is a multiple of 4. This proves the claim for every integer .
Check. At , the difference is . Negative multiples and zero are divisible by 4 as well.
The later integer need not have the larger square. The first example's negative check shows why a proof must handle signs without silently assuming the integers are positive.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account