J3 - Improved Euler’s method
A slope at the middle of an interval can estimate the change across the whole interval. You will use AQA’s two-step improved Euler recurrence, obtain its missing starting value with Euler’s method, and compare estimates at the same endpoint. Careful indexing matters as much as the arithmetic.
Use the two-step central recurrence
For , , how can a slope at help estimate the height at ? Instead of taking a short tangent step from the latest point, estimate the change from to using the slope halfway across.
Suppose are equally spaced, with gap . The whole interval from to has width . For a smooth solution and small nonzero , its chord gradient is approximated by the derivative at the middle:
Rearrange, then replace the unknown exact solution heights by numerical estimates.
Two-step improved Euler method
For ,
This is the improved Euler formula supplied on page 9 of the examination formula booklet. It needs two starting heights, and , on an equally spaced grid. The derivative must be defined at every evaluation point.
The base height and the gradient come from different rows: start at , but evaluate the gradient at . The factor is the distance from the base point to the new point. The slope point lies halfway between them.
[DIAGRAM: asset_name: A central slope bridges two steps; asset_slug: aqa7367-improved-euler; caption: Start from the earlier height and use the middle slope across a width of two h; description: A coordinate diagram for y prime equals y shows points at x equals zero, 0.5 and one with heights one, 1.5 and 2.5. A blue bridge from (0,1) to (1,2.5) has slope 1.5. A parallel clay segment through (0.5,1.5) shows the middle-row slope. Below the axis, two adjacent widths h equals 0.5 and their total 2h equals one are marked. Labels distinguish the earlier base height, middle height and new height.]

Worked example 1: bridge successive pairs of steps
Question. For , take , , and the supplied estimate at . Use the two-step method to find and .
Plan. For each new height, use the height two rows earlier plus times the intervening gradient.
Answer. and .
Check. Across the first bridge, , exactly the middle gradient. Independently, the exact solution gives approximately and ; neither numerical value should be labelled exact.
Now change only the grid spacing, with a corresponding supplied starting estimate. Keeping the factor visible prevents a missing factor of two.
Worked example 2: a wider grid
Question. For , take , at , and the supplied estimate at . Find and .
Plan. The bridge width is now , although consecutive grid positions differ by .
Answer. and .
Check. The exact values and are nearby. These endpoints differ from those in Worked example 1, so the two final heights alone do not compare the methods’ accuracy at a common point.
For an equation with no height dependence, each bridge adds . That is precisely one midpoint rectangle for the integral of the derivative across the bridge: another connection between differentiation and quadrature.
Watch out
Wrong: . That adds a two-step change to the wrong base height. Correct: .
Practise with a changed starting height.
Start the recurrence with an Euler step
One initial condition provides , but the central recurrence cannot yet calculate : it would require an unavailable .
Use ordinary Euler once to produce the second starting height, unless a different starting value or procedure is explicitly supplied:
Then switch to the two-step recurrence, beginning at . Keep the original ; it is still needed to calculate . Store two previous heights rather than overwriting one in place.
The Euler starting value is an approximation, so it influences later results. A supplied more accurate can change the answer even if every subsequent central step is identical. This does not license replacing the requested start in an examination task.
Worked example 3: initialise, then switch methods
Question. For , , take . Use Euler once, then the two-step improved Euler method to estimate .
Plan. Calculate by a one-step tangent update, then obtain from two-step bridges.
Answer. .
Check. The exact function satisfies the equation and initial condition. At it gives approximately , confirming a small approximation error rather than equality.
Change only the starting procedure: suppose a more accurate has been supplied. The central recurrence stays the same.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account