DG10 - Lagrange’s theorem

DG10 - Lagrange’s theorem

A subgroup cannot have an arbitrary size inside a finite group. You will use Lagrange’s theorem to restrict subgroup orders and element periods, then separate those necessary restrictions from proof that a particular subset is a subgroup.

Subgroup orders in finite groups

Can a group with 1515 elements contain a subgroup with 66 elements? The issue is whether the larger group can be divided into equal-sized blocks built from the subgroup.

Start with addition modulo 1212, and the subgroup H={0,4,8}H=\{0,4,8\}. Translating its elements by 0,1,2,30,1,2,3 gives

H0481+H1592+H26103+H3711\begin{array}{c|ccc} H&0&4&8\\ 1+H&1&5&9\\ 2+H&2&6&10\\ 3+H&3&7&11 \end{array}

These blocks contain every group element exactly once, with three elements per block. Thus 12=4×312=4\times3.

The same idea works for any subgroup HH of a finite group GG. For each g∈Gg\in G, form the block gH={g∗h:h∈H}gH=\{g*h:h\in H\}. Cancellation makes each block have exactly ∣H∣|H| elements. Every element belongs to a block, since g=g∗eg=g*e. Two blocks are either identical or disjoint: if g1∗h1=g2∗h2g_1*h_1=g_2*h_2, then g1=g2∗h2∗h1−1g_1=g_2*h_2*h_1^{-1}, so every g1∗hg_1*h is in g2Hg_2H; reversing the argument gives equality. The whole group therefore splits into an integer number of equal-sized blocks.

Lagrange’s theorem

If HH is a subgroup of a finite group GG, then

∣H∣∣∣G∣|H|\mid |G|

That is, the order of HH divides the order of GG.

Not in the formula booklet: learn it.

First list positive divisors. Then apply any extra words: proper removes ∣G∣|G|, while non-trivial removes 11. These are candidate orders; finding a subgroup still needs evidence.

Worked example 1: possible proper-subgroup orders

Question. A group GG has order 2424. State, with a reason, the possible orders of its proper subgroups according to Lagrange’s theorem.

Plan. List divisors of 2424, then exclude the whole group.

positive divisors of 24:1,2,3,4,6,8,12,24proper-subgroup candidates:1,2,3,4,6,8,12\begin{aligned} \text{positive divisors of }24&:1,2,3,4,6,8,12,24\\ \text{proper-subgroup candidates}&:1,2,3,4,6,8,12 \end{aligned}

The trivial subgroup has order 11 and is proper here.

Answer. 1,2,3,4,6,8,121,2,3,4,6,8,12: Lagrange’s theorem requires division of 2424, and proper excludes 2424.

Check. Dividing 2424 by each listed number gives an integer. The factor pairs (1,24),(2,12),(3,8),(4,6)(1,24),(2,12),(3,8),(4,6) show that no divisor has been missed.

Keep the same group order and add just the condition non-trivial.

Worked example 2: imposing both restrictions

Question. A group GG has order 2424. State the possible orders of its proper, non-trivial subgroups according to Lagrange’s theorem.

Plan. Start with the same divisors and exclude both boundary cases.

{1,2,3,4,6,8,12,24}∖{1,24}={2,3,4,6,8,12}\{1,2,3,4,6,8,12,24\}\setminus\{1,24\} =\{2,3,4,6,8,12\}

Answer. 2,3,4,6,8,122,3,4,6,8,12.

Check. These are exactly the divisors dd satisfying 1<d<241<d<24. The strict inequalities independently encode non-trivial and proper.

The opening question now has a definite answer: 66 does not divide 1515, so a subgroup of order 66 is impossible in a group of order 1515. Lagrange’s theorem concerns finite group orders; it is not an instruction to divide one infinity by another.

Watch out

“Proper” alone does not remove order 11. State the divisibility reason as well as the list when a question asks for a reason.

Apply both restrictions to a new group order.

Element periods and consequences

Repeating one element also creates a subgroup. If aa has period kk, its distinct powers before repetition are e,a,a2,…,ak−1e,a,a^2,\ldots,a^{k-1}. Products add exponents modulo kk, inverses are powers too, and associativity is inherited. This cyclic subgroup has order kk, so Lagrange’s theorem applies to it.

Period consequences

In a finite group GG of order NN, every element aa has a finite period kk, and

k∣N,aN=ek\mid N,\qquad a^N=e

More generally, if am=ea^m=e for a positive integer mm, then k∣mk\mid m. Under an additive operation, read ama^m as mm repetitions, usually written mama.

Not in the formula booklet: learn it.

Why does the period divide any return exponent? Write m=qk+rm=qk+r, with 0≤r<k0\le r<k. Then am=(ak)qar=ara^m=(a^k)^q a^r=a^r. If this is ee, minimality of kk forces r=0r=0. Conversely, every multiple of kk gives the identity. A return exponent need not be the least return exponent.

Worked example 3: restricting a period

Question. A group has order 1818. An element aa satisfies a6=ea^6=e and a3≠ea^3\ne e. Find the remaining possible periods of aa.

Plan. Use divisibility for equalities and eliminate periods incompatible with the inequality.

k∣18 and k∣6⟹k∈{1,2,3,6}a3≠e⟹k∤3\begin{aligned} k\mid18\text{ and }k\mid6&\quad\Longrightarrow\quad k\in\{1,2,3,6\}\\ a^3\ne e&\quad\Longrightarrow\quad k\nmid3 \end{aligned}

Thus periods 11 and 33 are excluded.

Answer. The period is 22 or 66; the given information does not distinguish them.

Check. Both occur in addition modulo 1818: 99 has period 22, and 33 has period 66. Six copies of either give 00, but three copies give 99, verifying that neither candidate can be removed.

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account