D9 - Rational inequalities
Multiplying an inequality by a negative number reverses its direction, so a denominator containing needs care. You will bring rational inequalities to one fraction, separate zeros from undefined inputs, and use signs to find complete solution sets safely.
Bring to one fraction
Is really equivalent to ? Treating multiplication by as an equivalent step with the same direction assumes is positive. At , the first inequality is false, while the second is true. We need a route that keeps both possible denominator signs.
Subtracting the same expression from both sides always preserves an inequality. First move everything to one side, then use a common denominator. The target is a single fraction compared with zero; its numerator and denominator signs can then be considered together.
You already know
Multiplying or dividing an inequality by a positive number preserves its direction. Multiplying or dividing by a negative number reverses it. A rational expression is defined only where its original denominator is nonzero.
The next pair keeps the fraction unchanged and changes only the comparison from a constant to a linear expression.
Worked example 1: comparing with a constant
Question. Write as an equivalent single-fraction inequality with zero on the right. State its domain.
Plan. Subtract 2 and express it with denominator , keeping the restriction .
Answer. , with , .
Check. At , the original left side minus 2 is . The new fraction gives . At , both differences are , so the negative-denominator case is retained too.
A linear comparison can make the new numerator quadratic. That is expected: multiplying the comparison expression by the denominator produces two linear factors.
Worked example 2: comparing with a line
Question. Write as an equivalent single-fraction inequality with zero on the right. State its domain.
Plan. Subtract , then put both terms over .
No multiplication of the inequality by has occurred: this is an identity between differences on the original domain.
Answer. , with .
Check. At , the original difference is . The new fraction is . This also checks the sign in front of .
The equivalent one-fraction form is the starting point for the sign method in Part 3, rather than the final interval answer.
Watch out
Wrong: . The minus sign acts on the entire product. Correct: .
Try a fresh comparison with a line.
Zeros and excluded denominator values
Two different events can separate sign intervals. A numerator zero can make the fraction equal zero; a denominator zero makes the original expression undefined. Both go on the sign chart, but they have different endpoint rules.
For , a zero requires and . The domain excludes every zero of the original denominator. If both vanish at one input, that input is still excluded, even when a common factor later cancels.
Critical values of a rational expression
For a rational inequality written as one fraction compared with zero, its critical values are the real numerator zeros and original denominator zeros. A numerator zero may be included for a non-strict inequality; an original denominator zero is never included.
The examples change only the multiplicity of the numerator's root.
Worked example 3: one zero and one exclusion
Question. For , find its zero and excluded input. Describe the sign behaviour near each.
Plan. Solve numerator and denominator equations separately, then inspect the signs immediately on either side.
At 2, the numerator changes sign while the denominator stays positive. At , the denominator changes sign while the numerator stays negative. The fraction changes sign across both critical values, but it equals zero only at 2.
Answer. Zero at ; domain . Both critical values separate opposite signs.
Check. . The nearby inputs give 4 and , whereas inputs 1 and 3 give and . These verify the two sign reversals without evaluating at the excluded input.
Squaring the numerator retains its zero but removes its sign reversal.
Worked example 4: an even numerator zero
Question. For , find its zero and excluded input. Describe the sign behaviour near each.
Plan. Keep the original denominator restriction and use the positive square away from 2.
Away from 2, the fraction therefore has the sign of . It changes sign at , but is positive on both sides of 2.
Answer. Zero at ; domain . There is a sign reversal at , but none at 2.
Check. and , both positive. Also while , confirming the reversal across .
Cancellation deserves the same care. For example,
The input 2 remains excluded and is not a zero of the original fraction. The notation means the real numbers with those two inputs removed.
Key idea
“Not negative” allows zero; it does not allow an undefined value. Equality in an inequality never restores an excluded denominator input.
Use that distinction to choose the correct description.
Sign charts for rational inequalities
A quotient is positive when its nonzero numerator and denominator have the same sign, and negative when they have opposite signs. This is the same multiplication-of-signs reasoning as for polynomials, with the extra requirement to exclude undefined inputs.
Order all critical values, determine the numerator and denominator sign in every open interval, then select the requested quotient sign. Finally inspect each critical value in the original expression. Include a valid numerator zero for or , and exclude all denominator zeros.
Worked example 5: a non-strict rational inequality
Question. Solve .
Plan. Split at and 2, compare signs, then decide which boundaries belong.
The positive intervals are and . Include 2 because it gives zero; exclude because the fraction is undefined there.
Answer. .
Check. . At , this gives 4, , , independently checking all three interval signs.
Change only the numerator's exponent. The sign chart must respect the even multiplicity, just as a polynomial sign chart does.
Worked example 6: keeping a zero inside an allowed interval
Question. Solve .
Plan. Use the squared numerator's sign, but check its zero separately.
The table covers open intervals. At 2 the fraction is zero, so it belongs and joins the two positive intervals. The input remains excluded.
Answer. , or .
Check. For , the denominator is positive and the numerator is non-negative, proving that the whole interval works. For , the numerator is positive and the denominator negative, so none works.
There is no need to leave a gap at a zero when equality is permitted. Conversely, for the same calculation would give , because the isolated zero would then be removed.
Watch out
Wrong: signs must alternate at every critical value. An even power does not change sign. Inspect multiplicities or use test values rather than forcing an alternating pattern.
Try a quotient with a zero to the left of its exclusion.
Multiplying safely when the denominator changes sign
The opening puzzle has two safe algebraic resolutions. You can split into cases where the denominator is positive and negative, reversing the inequality in the negative case. Or, after making one fraction, you can multiply by the square of its denominator, which is strictly positive on the original domain.
For , multiplying by gives the equivalent polynomial inequality . Retain , particularly with non-strict inequalities: the multiplied polynomial otherwise accepts forbidden denominator zeros.
This is a useful connection: rational sign problems become polynomial sign problems once the missing domain restriction is carried alongside them. Choose the shorter route; there is no obligation to expand every product.
Worked example 7: comparing a fraction with a line
Question. Solve .
Plan. Form one fraction, multiply by the positive square , and use exact polynomial signs.
The numerator is , so its zeros are and . Its sign is positive between these and negative outside. Combining with gives product signs across the ordered boundaries .
Answer. or .
Check. At , the original comparison is , true. At , it is , false. At , it is , true; at , , false. These test the four intervals directly.
Reverse only the inequality sign. The same boundaries now select the complementary strict-sign intervals; equality points still belong to neither strict inequality.
Worked example 8: the other direction
Question. Solve .
Plan. Use the same difference, keeping the sign reversal in the question distinct from any multiplication step.
The four signs are still ; select the second and fourth intervals.
Answer. or .
Check. Split directly at 2. For , multiplication by gives , hence ; intersection with gives . For , the direction stays , giving , hence . The case method agrees.
Both methods answer the initial concern: multiplying by without knowing its sign loses one of the cases. Multiplying by its positive square avoids that problem, but never removes the domain restriction.
Watch out
Wrong: means for every real . The equivalence holds only for . The new polynomial vanishes at denominator zeros, but the original fraction is undefined there.
Use a safe method for a new fraction-versus-line comparison.
Quick Recap
- Move all terms to one side and combine them into one fraction.
- Numerator zeros and denominator exclusions have different endpoint rules.
- Use signs on every interval; even multiplicities need not reverse the sign.
- Split by denominator sign or multiply by a positive denominator square, retaining the original domain.
The tempting multiplication in the opening puzzle is valid only after the denominator's sign has been fixed.