A1 - Induction for divisibility
Why is divisible by for every positive integer , even when the power is too large to calculate? Induction lets you prove divisibility by exposing an assumed integer multiple inside the next expression. You will learn to choose that rewrite, state the integer domain carefully, and complete the argument without leaving a logical gap.
Using the assumed multiple
Why does keep giving a multiple of ? The first values are . To explain every case, look at how one expression grows into the next:
If the bracket is already a multiple of , multiplying it by and adding preserves that property.
Divisibility
For integers and , “ is divisible by ” means for some integer . The notation is . In particular, zero is divisible by every nonzero integer, because .
In a divisibility proof, express the induction hypothesis as with an integer. Then rewrite to show it also equals times an integer.
Worked example 1: powers of five
Question. Prove by induction that is divisible by for all positive integers .
Plan. Check the first power, then make appear inside the next expression.
For , , so the basis holds.
Assume for an arbitrary integer , where is an integer. Then
Since is an integer, the next expression is divisible by .
Answer. The result holds at , and truth at implies truth at . Hence it holds for every positive integer , by induction.
Check. Expanding gives . At , the quotient is , agreeing with from .
Now change the base from to . The same rewrite leaves an added , so the natural divisor becomes .
Worked example 2: powers of nine
Question. Prove by induction that is divisible by for all positive integers .
Plan. Expose and show that the remaining term is also a multiple of .
At , .
Assume for an arbitrary integer , with an integer. Then
The bracket is an integer.
Answer. The basis holds, and the result for implies the result for . Therefore is divisible by for every positive integer , by induction.
Check. At , . The quotient recurrence gives , as required.
These examples reveal a general connection: multiplying an assumed multiple by an integer keeps it a multiple. The useful rewrite combines that fact with a remainder which is another multiple of the same divisor.
Watch out
Writing without saying is an integer does not express divisibility. Any real number can be written as with a real .
Change the base and divisor again.
Integer domains and starting cases
The domain is part of the claim, not an optional phrase at the end. An induction moving from to reaches a sequence of integers beginning at the checked basis. It does not establish all real inputs.
For , positive integers mean . The statement also holds for nonnegative integers, but that larger claim requires the extra case :
You can prove the nonnegative-integer claim directly by starting at and using exactly the same inductive step for an arbitrary integer . Starting at alone leaves unproved.
By contrast, at the expression is , which is not an integer, so it cannot be an integer multiple of . At , it is . Neither case belongs to the positive-integer claim. The integer restriction matters even though the power expression can be evaluated for other inputs.
Key idea
Choose the basis to match the stated domain. “All integers ” starts at ; “all nonnegative integers” starts at . State the same lower bound for the arbitrary integer in the induction hypothesis.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account