A1 - Induction for divisibility

A1 - Induction for divisibility

Why is 5n−15^n-1 divisible by 44 for every positive integer nn, even when the power is too large to calculate? Induction lets you prove divisibility by exposing an assumed integer multiple inside the next expression. You will learn to choose that rewrite, state the integer domain carefully, and complete the argument without leaving a logical gap.

Using the assumed multiple

Why does 5n−15^n-1 keep giving a multiple of 44? The first values are 4,24,1244,24,124. To explain every case, look at how one expression grows into the next:

5k+1−1=5(5k−1)+45^{k+1}-1=5(5^k-1)+4

If the bracket is already a multiple of 44, multiplying it by 55 and adding 44 preserves that property.

Divisibility

For integers d≠0d\ne0 and NN, “NN is divisible by dd” means N=dqN=dq for some integer qq. The notation is d∣Nd\mid N. In particular, zero is divisible by every nonzero integer, because 0=d×00=d\times0.

In a divisibility proof, express the induction hypothesis as f(k)=dqf(k)=dq with qq an integer. Then rewrite f(k+1)f(k+1) to show it also equals dd times an integer.

Worked example 1: powers of five

Question. Prove by induction that 5n−15^n-1 is divisible by 44 for all positive integers nn.

Plan. Check the first power, then make 5k−15^k-1 appear inside the next expression.

For n=1n=1, 51−1=4=4×15^1-1=4=4\times1, so the basis holds.

Assume 5k−1=4q5^k-1=4q for an arbitrary integer k≥1k\ge1, where qq is an integer. Then

5k+1−1=5×5k−1separate one factor of 5=5(5k−1)+4expose the assumed expression=5(4q)+4use the hypothesis=4(5q+1)factor out 4\begin{aligned} 5^{k+1}-1 &=5\times5^k-1 && \text{separate one factor of }5\\ &=5(5^k-1)+4 && \text{expose the assumed expression}\\ &=5(4q)+4 && \text{use the hypothesis}\\ &=4(5q+1) && \text{factor out }4 \end{aligned}

Since 5q+15q+1 is an integer, the next expression is divisible by 44.

Answer. The result holds at n=1n=1, and truth at kk implies truth at k+1k+1. Hence it holds for every positive integer nn, by induction.

Check. Expanding 5(5k−1)+45(5^k-1)+4 gives 5k+1−5+4=5k+1−15^{k+1}-5+4=5^{k+1}-1. At n=2n=2, the quotient is 24/4=624/4=6, agreeing with 5q+15q+1 from q=1q=1.

Now change the base from 55 to 99. The same rewrite leaves an added 88, so the natural divisor becomes 88.

Worked example 2: powers of nine

Question. Prove by induction that 9n−19^n-1 is divisible by 88 for all positive integers nn.

Plan. Expose 9k−19^k-1 and show that the remaining term is also a multiple of 88.

At n=1n=1, 91−1=8=8×19^1-1=8=8\times1.

Assume 9k−1=8q9^k-1=8q for an arbitrary integer k≥1k\ge1, with qq an integer. Then

9k+1−1=9(9k−1)+8rewrite using the same bracket=9(8q)+8use the hypothesis=8(9q+1)factor out 8\begin{aligned} 9^{k+1}-1 &=9(9^k-1)+8 && \text{rewrite using the same bracket}\\ &=9(8q)+8 && \text{use the hypothesis}\\ &=8(9q+1) && \text{factor out }8 \end{aligned}

The bracket 9q+19q+1 is an integer.

Answer. The basis holds, and the result for kk implies the result for k+1k+1. Therefore 9n−19^n-1 is divisible by 88 for every positive integer nn, by induction.

Check. At n=2n=2, 92−1=80=8×109^2-1=80=8\times10. The quotient recurrence gives 9(1)+1=109(1)+1=10, as required.

These examples reveal a general connection: multiplying an assumed multiple by an integer keeps it a multiple. The useful rewrite combines that fact with a remainder which is another multiple of the same divisor.

Watch out

Writing 5k−1=4q5^k-1=4q without saying qq is an integer does not express divisibility. Any real number can be written as 4q4q with a real qq.

Change the base and divisor again.

Integer domains and starting cases

The domain is part of the claim, not an optional phrase at the end. An induction moving from kk to k+1k+1 reaches a sequence of integers beginning at the checked basis. It does not establish all real inputs.

For 5n−15^n-1, positive integers mean n=1,2,3,…n=1,2,3,\ldots. The statement also holds for nonnegative integers, but that larger claim requires the extra case n=0n=0:

50−1=0=4×05^0-1=0=4\times0

You can prove the nonnegative-integer claim directly by starting at 00 and using exactly the same inductive step for an arbitrary integer k≥0k\ge0. Starting at 11 alone leaves 00 unproved.

By contrast, at n=−1n=-1 the expression is 1/5−1=−4/51/5-1=-4/5, which is not an integer, so it cannot be an integer multiple of 44. At n=1/2n=1/2, it is 5−1\sqrt5-1. Neither case belongs to the positive-integer claim. The integer restriction matters even though the power expression can be evaluated for other inputs.

Key idea

Choose the basis to match the stated domain. “All integers n≥2n\ge2” starts at 22; “all nonnegative integers” starts at 00. State the same lower bound for the arbitrary integer kk in the induction hypothesis.

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account