Pure 7.1 - Derivatives, tangents and second derivatives
A curve keeps changing its steepness, so how can it have an exact gradient at one point? Build the derivative from nearby chord gradients, prove the first rules, and use first and second derivatives to read a curve's movement and shape.
From straight-line gradient to tangent gradient
On , can you find the exact gradient at using two points that are never quite the same? Joining to gives gradient . Joining it to gives . The answer seems to be approaching , but no single finite chord proves that.
You already know
A straight line has gradient , provided . Expanding gives .
The chord joins two points on the curve. A tangent captures its direction locally at one point; it need not meet the curve only once. As the second point approaches the first, the chord gradient can approach one definite value.
[DIAGRAM: asset_slug: p1_7_1_understand_and_use_the_derivative_of_f_x_as_the_gradient_of_the_tangent_and_second_derivative__diagram_01; asset_name: Chords approaching the tangent; caption: Chord gradients approach 6 at P as the second point approaches P; description: On y=x squared, P is (3,9). Chords to x=4, 3.5 and 3.1 have slopes 7, 6.5 and 6.1. The tangent at P has slope 6.]

Derivative
The derivative is the finite limiting gradient of chords through , as the other point approaches it from either side. It is the tangent gradient there and is also written .
A limit need not be attained by a chord. That is the small but powerful surprise: every non-zero chord width here gives , yet its limiting value is exactly .
At a sharp corner the two sides can disagree. For at zero, the left-hand gradients are and the right-hand gradients are , so there is no derivative there. A finite derivative also requires the function to be defined at the point; at an endpoint only one side may be available.
Key idea
A chord gives an average gradient over an interval; the derivative gives the limiting tangent gradient at one point, when that limit exists.
Use the corner example to separate “a graph exists” from “a derivative exists”.
The derivative as a limit
Give the two points coordinates and . Their horizontal separation is , so the chord gradient is the change in function value divided by .
Derivative from first principles
At an interior point where this finite two-sided limit exists,
In the formula booklet.
Keep while simplifying. The arrow means “approaches”, not “equals”; putting zero into the original fraction produces the undefined expression .
Worked example 1: the square function
Question. Differentiate from first principles and find the gradient at .
Plan. Expand the shifted square, cancel, divide by non-zero , then take the limit.
Why this step? Cancelling the factor makes the limiting expression defined at zero.
Answer. , so the required gradient is .
Check. Chord gradients at are ; widths and give and .
Change one feature: add the linear term . Its change is exactly , so its contribution to every chord gradient is .
Worked example 2: adding a linear term
Question. Use first principles to show that has derivative .
Plan. Substitute the entire function at and at , keeping the subtraction bracket.
Why this step? Subtracting the whole original function cancels both and .
Answer. , as required.
Check. At , the chord gradient is , approaching .
The same subtraction habit matters even when the constant looks harmless.
Watch out
Wrong: cancel from a sum such as . Cancellation requires a common factor of the whole numerator. Here expansion first creates .
Now alter the coefficient of the linear term and retain the full limit working.
First principles for powers and trigonometric functions
The square proof is the start of a general pattern: in , the unshifted term cancels and every remaining term contains . You need this argument for small positive integer powers, particularly the square and cube.
Worked example 3: the cube
Question. Prove from first principles that .
Plan. Expand the shifted cube and divide its change by .
Why this step? The and terms still matter until division has reduced their powers.
Answer. .
Check. At , the chord gradient is , approaching .
Change just the multiplier of the same cube; the entire change is doubled.
Worked example 4: a multiple of a cube
Question. Differentiate from first principles.
Plan. Keep the factor outside the difference quotient.
Why this step? Multiplying every height by doubles every chord gradient.
Answer. .
Check. At , the quotient is , approaching .
Trigonometric proofs use the same definition, but addition formulae replace polynomial expansion. In radians,
These two limits are not printed in the booklet. Learn how they are used; a question may supply them. For small positive , the unit-circle comparison squeezes to ; symmetry gives the negative side. Also . The addition formulae themselves are supplied.
Worked example 5: sine from first principles
Question. Using the two limits above, show that .
Plan. Expand , then separate the two known limits.
Why this step? Treat as fixed while tends to zero, so and are constant multipliers.
Answer. The derivative is , for radian input.
Check. At zero, the quotient is .
Change only the function from sine to cosine. The minus sign in its addition formula changes the final derivative.
Worked example 6: cosine from first principles
Question. Show from first principles that .
Plan. Use .
Why this step? The minus sign belongs to the whole sine term and survives the limit.
Answer. The derivative is , for radian input.
Check. At , the cosine graph falls with gradient , matching .
The derived square, cube, sine and cosine derivative results are not printed in the booklet: learn them. Only the first-principles definition used to establish them is printed there.
Exam tip
If a question requests first principles, show the difference quotient, the expansion or addition formula, and the limiting step. Quoting the final derivative does not establish it.
Use the cosine proof again with a changed constant multiplier.
The derivative as a rate of change
A displacement graph turns gradient into velocity. If metres, its derivative has units of metres per second. At , that instantaneous rate is . The average from zero to four seconds is instead .
Instantaneous rate of change
measures the limiting change in per unit change in . Its units are the units of divided by the units of ; it can be negative.
For these polynomial examples, use the derivatives just established and differentiate constant multiples and sums term by term. Their general rules will be developed next lesson; they are not printed in the booklet.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account