Pure 2.2 - Surds and rationalising denominators
Surds keep answers exact while you change their form. You will simplify and multiply square-root expressions, then rationalise single-term and two-term denominators without changing the value of a fraction.
Exact surd form
Can a fraction with an awkward square root underneath simplify to just ? Try . A decimal calculation suggests about , but an exact calculation will reveal why these two expressions are identical.
You already know
, so . A square root means the non-negative root: , whereas solving gives .
The number is an exact value, not a decimal waiting to be rounded. A surd is an irrational root retained in exact form; and are surds, while is rational. A rational multiple such as is a surd expression.
Square-root rules
For real , ,
In particular, for real .
Not in the formula booklet: learn it.
Extract a square factor before collecting terms: . The remaining root should have no integer square factor greater than . Algebraic roots need the same care: , not always .
Worked example 1: collecting like surds
Question. Simplify .
Plan. Extract square factors, then collect the coefficients of .
Why this step? The roots only become like terms after simplification.
Answer. .
Check. , ; their difference is about .
Change only subtraction to addition. The square-factor work stays the same.
Worked example 2: changing the operation
Question. Simplify .
Plan. Simplify both roots before adding their coefficients.
Why this step? The operation acts on the coefficients; the shared root remains.
Answer. .
Check. , and expanding also gives ; both expressions are positive.
The product rule does not extend to sums.
Watch out
Wrong: . Right: . Split a product under a root, not a sum.
Keep the final answer exact and collect every like term.
Multiplying and expanding surds
A surd behaves like an algebraic term in a bracket. For , expand all four products: . Remember that the last product contains .
Difference of two square-root terms
For real , ,
The middle products cancel. Not in the formula booklet: learn it.
This is the ordinary difference of squares: . It is especially useful when your goal is to remove roots.
Worked example 3: expanding two brackets
Question. Simplify .
Plan. Expand, replace the squared root, then collect.
Why this step? The unlike constants in the brackets mean the middle terms do not cancel.
Answer. .
Check. The first bracket is positive and the second negative, so the negative final answer has the correct sign.
Change only the second bracket's constant from to . Now its terms match the first bracket apart from one sign.
Worked example 4: a conjugate product
Question. Simplify .
Plan. Use the difference of squares.
Why this step? Equal constants and opposite root terms make the cross-products cancel exactly.
Answer. .
Check. Full expansion gives .
This cancellation is the engine behind the next two parts.
Watch out
Wrong: . The coefficient is squared too: .
Show the square calculation when the answer is supplied.
Rationalising a single-surd denominator
Rationalising means rewriting a fraction with a rational denominator. You are changing its appearance, not its value: multiply numerator and denominator by the same non-zero root. For example, .
Rationalising a denominator
To rationalise a denominator is to give an equivalent fraction whose denominator is rational. A surd may remain in the numerator; is a valid final form.
For a denominator , where and , multiplication by makes the denominator . This method is not supplied in the formula booklet.
Worked example 5: a two-term numerator
Question. Rationalise and simplify .
Plan. Multiply the whole numerator and denominator by .
Why this step? Every term in the numerator must receive the multiplier.
Answer. .
Check. Multiplying the answer by returns .
Change only the numerator's constant from to . The denominator and multiplier remain fixed.
Worked example 6: simplifying the whole numerator
Question. Rationalise and simplify .
Plan. Use the same root multiplier and reduce the fraction.
Why this step? Reduction divides all numerator terms and the denominator by the common factor.
Answer. .
Check. .
It is fine for the final coefficients to be fractions.
Watch out
Wrong: . The second product is , so the correct numerator is .
Use that correction to finish the exact calculation yourself.
Rationalising a two-term denominator
A single root will not clear the denominator ; it just moves the root to its other term. Instead, arrange for the middle terms to cancel by changing one sign.
Conjugate
The conjugate of is , and conversely. For example, is the conjugate of ; is not.
For rational , and positive integer , their product is , which is rational. This result is not in the formula booklet. The original denominator and its conjugate multiplier must be non-zero.
Worked example 7: answering the opening puzzle
Question. Rationalise .
Plan. Multiply top and bottom by .
Why this step? The opposite sign removes both middle products from the denominator.
Answer. .
Check. , the original numerator.
Change only the sign in the denominator. The conjugate's sign must change with it.
Worked example 8: a minus sign in the denominator
Question. Rationalise .
Plan. Use the conjugate .
Why this step? Multiplying by the same denominator again would square it and retain a root term.
Answer. .
Check. .
A more complicated numerator simply needs expansion: . The denominator is still , and the numerator comes from all four products. There is a pleasant exact surprise here: the two opening fractions multiply to , since their simplified forms are conjugates.
Exam tip
Write the chosen multiplier explicitly. A correct conjugate method can earn method credit even when a later expansion contains a slip.
Your turn keeps the same conjugate idea and adds a numerator to expand.
Choosing a clean final form
Rationalising may leave another step: collect like roots, use a common denominator and match the requested form. “Exact” means retaining roots and fractions; it does not mean leaving an expression unsimplified. This habit is useful later for exact trigonometric values and quadratic roots.
Worked example 9: combining after rationalising
Question. Show that .
Plan. Rationalise the fraction, then subtract using denominator .
Why this step? Rewrite the separate as before combining.
Answer. The required identity follows with exact working.
Check. Both sides are approximately .
Change only the subtraction to addition. The rationalisation stays exactly the same.
Worked example 10: matching a requested form
Question. Express as , where , are rational.
Plan. Rationalise, add, then split the final fraction.
Why this step? The requested form identifies the rational coefficients separately.
Answer. , .
Check. Multiplying the answer minus by gives .
The final form must describe the same exact number throughout.
Watch out
Wrong: . The denominator divides both terms, so the rational term is .
For the last calculation, change the coefficient and denominator sign while keeping the same rationalise-then-collect strategy.
Quick Recap
- Simplify roots by extracting square factors; collect only like surds.
- Expand every bracket product and use for .
- A conjugate changes one sign and turns a denominator product into a difference of squares.
- Rationalising preserves value; finish by collecting terms and matching the requested exact form.
The opening puzzle is resolved: , since their denominator and conjugate multiply to .