Pure 5.2 - Small angle approximations

Pure 5.2 - Small angle approximations

Replace trigonometric expressions near zero by simple algebra, while keeping track of radians and the size of the whole angle. You will simplify quotients, estimate a small root and decide whether an approximation makes sense.

The local picture near zero

Could you estimate cos⁡3∘\cos3^\circ without pressing a trigonometric key? A tiny angle lets a quadratic do the job. First look at 0.040.04 radians: its sine is 0.039989…0.039989\ldots, its tangent is 0.040021…0.040021\ldots, and its cosine is 0.9992001…0.9992001\ldots. Those values suggest two straight-line approximations and one quadratic.

You already know

Radian measure is arc length divided by radius. Convert degrees using θradians=θdegreesπ/180\theta_{\text{radians}}=\theta_{\text{degrees}}\pi/180; 3∘=π/603^\circ=\pi/60 radians. At zero, sine and tangent are 00, while cosine is 11.

On a unit circle, a small positive angle lies between its sine and tangent: sin⁡θ<θ<tan⁡θ\sin\theta<\theta<\tan\theta for 0<θ<π/20<\theta<\pi/2. The inner triangle, sector and outer tangent triangle give this comparison of areas. As the angle shrinks, all three squeeze together. Cosine is different: its graph is almost flat at height 11, so its first visible change is quadratic.

[DIAGRAM: asset_slug: p1_5_2_understand_and_use_the_standard_small_angle_approximations_of_sine_cosine_and_tangent__diagram_01; asset_name: Small-angle graphs; caption: Near zero, sine and tangent follow the line while cosine follows a shallow quadratic; description: Two panels compare sine and tangent with y equals x, and cosine with y equals 1 minus x squared over 2, on radian axes near zero.]
Near zero, sine and tangent follow the line while cosine follows a shallow quadratic

Small-angle approximations

For a small angle θ\theta measured in radians,

sin⁡θ≈θ,cos⁡θ≈1−θ22,tan⁡θ≈θ.\sin\theta\approx\theta,\qquad \cos\theta\approx1-\frac{\theta^2}{2},\qquad \tan\theta\approx\theta.

They apply on either side of zero and become more accurate as ∣θ∣|\theta| decreases. In the formula booklet.

For θ=0.04\theta=0.04, these give sin⁡0.04≈0.04\sin0.04\approx0.04, tan⁡0.04≈0.04\tan0.04\approx0.04 and cos⁡0.04≈1−0.042/2=0.9992\cos0.04\approx1-0.04^2/2=0.9992. A pleasing surprise is that the cosine estimate already agrees to 66 decimal places. “Small” is about the required accuracy; there is no universal cut-off.

Approximation

An approximation replaces a value by a nearby, simpler value. The symbol ≈\approx signals that replacement. It is not an identity: for example, sin⁡0.1≠0.1\sin0.1\ne0.1, even though they are close.

A calculator can measure the error, but it cannot rescue an approximation used with degrees as if they were radians.

Key idea

Approximate the whole radian angle, and keep the distinction between an approximate replacement and subsequent exact algebra.

Check which feature of cosine survives near zero.

Substitute the whole angle

In cos⁡3x\cos3x, the angle is 3x3x, so the approximation contains (3x)2(3x)^2, not 3x23x^2. Think of the formula booklet's θ\theta as an empty slot into which the whole angle goes. If the expression contains both 3x3x and 4x4x, both must be small.

Worked example 1: substituting a multiple angle

Question. For small non-zero xx in radians, approximate

cos⁡3x−1xsin⁡4x.\frac{\cos3x-1}{x\sin4x}.

Plan. Replace each trigonometric term using its whole angle, then simplify the quotient.

cos⁡3x≈1−(3x)22=1−9x22square the whole anglesin⁡4x≈4xwhole sine anglecos⁡3x−1xsin⁡4x≈(1−9x2/2)−1x(4x)substitute with brackets=−98cancel non-zero x2\begin{aligned} \cos3x&\approx1-\frac{(3x)^2}{2}=1-\frac{9x^2}{2} &&\text{square the whole angle}\\ \sin4x&\approx4x &&\text{whole sine angle}\\ \frac{\cos3x-1}{x\sin4x} &\approx\frac{(1-9x^2/2)-1}{x(4x)} &&\text{substitute with brackets}\\ &=-\frac98 &&\text{cancel non-zero }x^2 \end{aligned}

Why this step? Both top and bottom have leading terms in x2x^2; keeping the quadratic cosine term is essential.

Answer. The expression is approximately −9/8-9/8.

Check. At x=0.001x=0.001, direct evaluation gives about −1.125002-1.125002, close to −1.125-1.125.

Change only the multiple in the cosine angle, from 3x3x to 5x5x. Its coefficient is squared, so it has a larger effect than you might expect.

Worked example 2: the coefficient is squared

Question. For small non-zero xx in radians, approximate

cos⁡5x−1xsin⁡4x.\frac{\cos5x-1}{x\sin4x}.

Plan. Substitute the small-angle forms and cancel the common power.

cos⁡5x−1≈(1−25x22)−1=−25x22whole angle 5xxsin⁡4x≈4x2multiply by xcos⁡5x−1xsin⁡4x≈−25x2/24x2=−258x≠0\begin{aligned} \cos5x-1&\approx\left(1-\frac{25x^2}{2}\right)-1=-\frac{25x^2}{2} &&\text{whole angle }5x\\ x\sin4x&\approx4x^2 &&\text{multiply by }x\\ \frac{\cos5x-1}{x\sin4x}&\approx\frac{-25x^2/2}{4x^2}=-\frac{25}{8} &&x\ne0 \end{aligned}

Why this step? The 55 becomes 2525 inside the quadratic; it is not a multiplier outside cosine.

Answer. Approximately −25/8-25/8.

Check. At x=0.001x=0.001, the original quotient is about −3.125002-3.125002, close to −3.125-3.125.

Write the square before simplifying the coefficient.

Watch out

Wrong: cos⁡3x≈1−3x2/2\cos3x\approx1-3x^2/2. Correct: cos⁡3x≈1−(3x)2/2=1−9x2/2\cos3x\approx1-(3x)^2/2=1-9x^2/2. Also, small xx alone is insufficient if its multiplier is so large that the whole angle is not small.

Change the cosine multiple again, keeping the same structure.

Brackets and cancellation

In 1−cos⁡3θ1-\cos3\theta, the initial subtraction acts on the entire cosine approximation. You need 1−(1−9θ2/2)=9θ2/21-(1-9\theta^2/2)=9\theta^2/2. This is ordinary bracket algebra, but the two nearby ones make it an easy place to lose a sign.

You already know

1−(1−u)=u1-(1-u)=u, and only factors can cancel from a fraction. A factor θ2\theta^2 can cancel only when θ≠0\theta\ne0; cancelling does not define the original quotient at zero.

Pearson's 2024 small-angle question exposed exactly these slips: brackets, squaring the whole angle and losing the outer subtraction. Show the replacement line before tidying it.

Worked example 3: keeping the outer subtraction

Question. For small non-zero θ\theta in radians, approximate

θtan⁡2θ1−cos⁡3θ.\frac{\theta\tan2\theta}{1-\cos3\theta}.

Plan. Approximate top and bottom separately, keeping the denominator's bracket.

θtan⁡2θ≈θ(2θ)=2θ2whole tangent angle1−cos⁡3θ≈1−(1−9θ22)=9θ22outer minusθtan⁡2θ1−cos⁡3θ≈2θ29θ2/2=49cancel factors\begin{aligned} \theta\tan2\theta&\approx\theta(2\theta)=2\theta^2 &&\text{whole tangent angle}\\ 1-\cos3\theta&\approx1-\left(1-\frac{9\theta^2}{2}\right)=\frac{9\theta^2}{2} &&\text{outer minus}\\ \frac{\theta\tan2\theta}{1-\cos3\theta}&\approx\frac{2\theta^2}{9\theta^2/2}=\frac49 &&\text{cancel factors} \end{aligned}

Why this step? Replacing cosine by 11 alone would erase the denominator's leading non-zero term.

Answer. Approximately 4/94/9.

Check. At θ=0.001\theta=0.001, the original is about 0.4444450.444445, close to 4/94/9.

Change only the denominator's angle from 3θ3\theta to 4θ4\theta. Its quadratic coefficient changes the final ratio.

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account