P4 1.1 - Proof by contradiction
Prove a statement by showing that its negation leads to an impossibility. Build precise assumptions, prove that is irrational and that there are infinitely many primes, then adapt the same reasoning to unfamiliar statements.
Assuming the negation
Could any finite list contain every prime number? Checking larger and larger primes will never settle that question. A proof can instead assume that a complete finite list exists, then show why that assumption defeats itself. First learn how to make such an assumption precisely.
To prove “if , then ”, a contradiction argument keeps and assumes that is false. The negation of “every allowed value works” is “at least one allowed value fails”, not “every value fails”. The original domain still applies.
Proof by contradiction
To prove a statement by contradiction, assume its negation, derive a consequence that conflicts with a known fact or an assumption, and conclude that the negation is impossible. Therefore the original statement is true.
An integer is either even, , or odd, , for an integer . It cannot be both. These forms turn a parity claim into algebra.
Worked example 1: an even square
Prove by contradiction that if is even, then the integer is even.
Plan. Keep the even-square assumption and suppose that is odd.
Assume is even but , where is an integer. Then
The bracket is an integer, so is odd, contradicting its assumed evenness.
Answer. The assumption that is odd is impossible; therefore is even.
Check. The contradiction concerns the same quantity, : it was assumed even and proved odd. No special value of was used, so the argument covers every integer satisfying the premise.
Change only the target parity from even to odd. The negated conclusion must change too.
Worked example 2: an odd square
Prove by contradiction that if is odd, then the integer is odd.
Plan. Assume the square is odd but the integer is even, then calculate the square's parity.
Assume is odd and for an integer . Then
which is even. This contradicts the assumption that is odd.
Answer. cannot be even; hence it is odd.
Check. Every integer that is not odd is even, so the assumed case was the complete negation of the conclusion. The algebra establishes a conflict with the retained premise.
The assumption should contain both the given information and the opposite of what you must prove.
Watch out
To prove “if , then ”, do not assume “not and ”. That describes a different situation. In Example 1 the contradictory assumption is “ even and odd”.
Apply the same approach after a small change to the expression.
Irrationality of square root of two
No terminating decimal calculation can prove that is irrational. Instead, assuming a rational representation forces both its numerator and denominator to be even, even when the fraction was chosen in lowest terms.
A rational number is expressible as , where are integers and . A real number with no such representation is irrational. Any rational number can be written in lowest terms by cancelling common factors.
Coprime integers
Integers are coprime if their only common positive factor is . A fraction in lowest terms has coprime numerator and denominator. If both were even, would be a common factor, contradicting that choice.
From the previous part, an even integer square must have an even base. That result is essential; writing “ even, so even” now has an established reason.
Worked example 3: irrationality of square root of two
Prove by contradiction that is irrational.
Plan. Assume a lowest-terms rational representation, square it, and use parity to force a common factor.
Assume , with positive coprime integers . Squaring gives
Thus is even, so is even. Write , for an integer . Substituting gives
So , and hence , is even too. Then have the common factor , contradicting their being coprime.
Answer. A rational representation is impossible, so is irrational.
Check. The contradiction requires both numbers to be even. One even numerator would not conflict with a fraction being in lowest terms. Every parity step follows from an exact integer equation, not a decimal approximation.
Change only the number inside the root from to . The odd denominator changes the algebra but preserves the parity argument.
Worked example 4: adapting the parity argument
Prove by contradiction that is irrational.
Plan. Assume a coprime fraction, clear the denominator, and again force both integers to be even.
Assume , with positive coprime integers . Then
The right side is even. Since is odd, must be even: an odd would make odd. Hence , for an integer , and
Thus is even as well, contradicting coprimality.
Answer. is irrational.
Check. The critical odd-factor step can be checked algebraically: if , then , which is odd. It therefore cannot equal the even integer . The proof does not assume irrationality of another root.
The lowest-terms choice turns a common-factor conclusion into an actual contradiction.
Watch out
“The numerator and denominator are even” is possible for an unreduced fraction, such as . State coprimality at the start; otherwise you have not explained why evenness is impossible.
Change the odd denominator from to .
Infinitely many primes
A finite list can always be challenged by a number built from its own entries. Multiplying all the listed primes and adding one produces a number that none of those primes can divide.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account