P2 5.3 - Solving exponential equations
Solve equations in which the unknown occurs in an exponent, using a common base or logarithms. You will derive change of base, calculate approximations without losing accuracy, and keep exact answers when finding graph intersections.
Same-base equations
Where do and meet? Trying integer inputs will miss the intersection. We will develop a method that gives both coordinates exactly.
Start with the simpler fact . Because is strictly increasing, the two outputs can be equal only when . A decay exponential is strictly decreasing, but also takes each output only once, so the same reasoning applies.
You already know
, , and for a positive base. These laws let you rewrite different-looking powers with one common base.
For , ,
First make the bases genuinely equal. You cannot simply equate the exponents in .
Worked example 1: rewriting both sides
Question. Solve .
Plan. Write both sides as powers of , then equate exponents.
Answer. .
Check. .
Change only the right-hand side to its reciprocal. The corresponding exponent changes sign.
Worked example 2: a reciprocal target
Question. Solve .
Plan. Use base again, writing the reciprocal as a negative power.
Answer. .
Check. The exponent on the original base is , so .
Brackets prevent a common index slip.
Watch out
, not . The outer power multiplies the entire exponent.
Choose a common base for this reciprocal target.
Using logarithms
When the target is not a convenient power of the base, a logarithm brings the unknown exponent down where ordinary algebra can reach it.
For , take base- logarithms on both sides:
The power law is the key step. Dividing by isolates . Any single valid logarithm base works, provided you use it consistently.
For an equation with , , a real solution requires . If , positivity of the exponential already proves there is no real solution; do not take a logarithm of that target.
Worked example 3: an exponent with no common-base shortcut
Question. Solve , giving an exact expression and a value to three decimal places.
Plan. Take logarithms, use the power law and divide by the logarithm of the base.
Answer. .
Check. Since , the exponent must lie between and . Substituting the unrounded quotient into gives ; using gives approximately .
Change only the exponent from to . Logarithms isolate the entire bracket first.
Worked example 4: a linear expression in the exponent
Question. Solve , giving an exact expression and a value to three decimal places.
Plan. Apply the power law to , then solve the resulting linear equation.
Answer. .
Check. The unrounded value makes equal to the exponent in Example 3. Thus , independently of any final rounding.
Keep full calculator precision until the requested final answer.
Watch out
. Writing loses the bracket and changes the equation. Also, , not a product of logarithms.
Use the same sequence of steps with a new linear exponent.
Change of base
A calculator need not have a key for your chosen base: every logarithm can be expressed using another valid base.
Let . Its meaning is . Taking base- logarithms gives , so division gives the change-of-base formula.
Change of base
For , and ,
The argument's logarithm goes on top; the original base's logarithm goes below.
In the formula booklet.
In particular, the exact answer in Example 3 is . Its base- quotient is just another exact notation for the same number. A base between zero and one is valid; its base- logarithm is negative.
Worked example 5: calculating a logarithm in a new base
Question. Find to four decimal places.
Plan. Change to base , retaining all digits until the end.
Answer. .
Check. , so the answer lies between and . Raising to the unrounded quotient returns .
Change only the original base to its reciprocal. The numerator stays the same and the denominator changes sign.
Worked example 6: a decay base
Question. Find to four decimal places.
Plan. Use the same formula with .
Answer. .
Check. If , then . The new exponent must therefore be the negative of Example 5's value.
The order in the quotient matters.
Watch out
is , not . A quick bound from powers of the original base catches an upside-down quotient.
Keep the negative denominator when the base is below one.
Exact and approximate answers
An exact logarithm preserves information that a rounded decimal loses, especially when you use the answer in another exponential expression.
For example, exactly. There is no need to calculate before using it. An exact answer is useful when a question asks for a logarithmic coordinate or an integer expression for another coordinate; approximate only when requested.
Problem-solving
At an intersection, equate the two expressions for . Simplify powers before taking logarithms: division by is valid because it is positive, and may leave a much simpler equation.
This supplies the method for the opening problem.
Worked example 7: exact coordinates of an intersection
Question. Find the exact intersection of and , writing the first coordinate as a single logarithm.
Plan. Equate the outputs, divide by the positive factor , then reuse the resulting exact power to find .
Answer. .
Check. Using the other curve gives . Both curves have the same height, and has only one real solution.
Change only the coefficient of the second curve from to . Its exact height changes as well as the logarithm's argument.
Worked example 8: a different coefficient
Question. Find the exact intersection of and , writing the first coordinate as a single logarithm.
Plan. Simplify the common exponential factor before evaluating either coordinate.
Answer. .
Check. The first curve gives . Since , the first coordinate lies between and , consistent with the two heights.
These calculations answer the opening puzzle without a search through decimal inputs. If an approximation were requested, evaluate the exact logarithm only at the final step.
Exam tip
An exact-answer instruction calls for an exact form such as , rather than only a decimal. When all stages are requested, show the index or logarithm steps that lead to it.
Change the coefficient once more and retain the exact power for the height.