AQA 7042 · 2O · R21 - Rationing, indoctrination, propaganda and morale; the changing impact of war on different sections of society
You will investigate how rationing, indoctrination and propaganda shaped morale in Germany between 1939 and 1945. The lesson compares changing burdens on elites, workers, women and youth, and explains how war effort continued while confidence and exposure to danger became increasingly unequal.
Rationing and the early home front
There was no single German mood when war began on 1 September 1939. Memories of hunger, bereavement and defeat in the First World War produced anxiety rather than the mass enthusiasm seen in some propaganda images. The regime had planned rationing since 1937 because Hitler and other leaders believed that shortages had helped to break the German home front in 1918. Rapid victory in Poland and, especially, France then produced a surge of confidence in 1940, but victory enthusiasm was not the same as permanent loyalty or an equal experience of war.
Rationing
A state system that limits each person’s entitlement to buy scarce goods, usually through coupons or cards. A ration card did not make goods free, and an entitlement did not guarantee that a shop had the item.
The system began immediately. From 1 September 1939, fats, meat, butter, milk, cheese, sugar and jam were obtainable only against food cards; bread and eggs followed on 25 September. In the first two war years, the weekly entitlement of a normal consumer included 2,250 grams of bread, 500 grams of meat and about 270 grams of fat. These are allocation figures, not proof of what every person actually obtained or ate. Heavy workers received supplements, while children and expectant mothers had different entitlements.
This policy could support morale in three ways. It signalled preparation, promised a minimum share and made shortages appear to be distributed by rule rather than by price alone. Early victories and food taken from occupied Europe also allowed the regime to protect many Germans it counted as members of its racial Volksgemeinschaft, or “people’s community”, from a First World War-style food collapse. That protection was founded on exclusion: Jews, foreign forced labourers and populations under occupation were not treated as equal members of the rationing community. Their persecution and exploitation are not evidence that German society shared sacrifice fairly.
Even among included Germans, formal entitlement did not produce identical access. An internal SD report of 18 March 1940 recorded that employed women who could shop only in the evening, and housewives who could not queue for hours, often missed scarce non-rationed goods. Rural contacts, money, time, occupation and connections could all affect what reached a household. Rationing therefore had a levelling tendency without erasing class, gender, regional or racial inequality.
Propaganda, indoctrination and source value
Propaganda is selected communication designed to shape attitudes or behaviour. Indoctrination is a more sustained attempt to make a set of ideas appear unquestionable through institutions, routines and identity. Nazi propaganda used controlled press, radio, film, newsreels, speeches and entertainment; indoctrination operated through schools, the Hitler Youth, the League of German Girls (BDM), Party organisations, rituals and war service. The two overlapped, but neither exposure nor compulsory participation proves private belief.
The message changed with the war. In 1939–41, reports of rapid victory sat alongside entertainment that preserved an impression of normality and connected the “home front” emotionally to soldiers. After the invasion of the Soviet Union became a prolonged war, propaganda increasingly demanded endurance and sacrifice. News of defeats conflicted with private letters, casualties, bombing and foreign broadcasts. By late 1943, an SD report admitted declining trust in press and radio because people had learned to read between official lines.
Authentic contemporary source
Wollt ihr den totalen Krieg?
NovaLearn translation: “Do you want total war?”
Joseph Goebbels, Reich Minister of Propaganda, Sportpalast speech, Berlin, 18 February 1943, shortly after the defeat at Stalingrad. The full speech was delivered to a carefully selected audience, broadcast more widely and reported in the press. In its surrounding questions, Goebbels demanded longer work, fuller deployment of women, punishment of alleged shirkers and an image of equal sacrifice. German History in Documents and Images source record. Only the five German words above and NovaLearn’s translation are reproduced.
For an enquiry into how the regime tried to mobilise society after Stalingrad, the source is highly valuable. Its content shows that propaganda now acknowledged heavier burdens and made public consent part of the performance. Its provenance matters because Goebbels controlled national propaganda and spoke at a carefully staged, broadcast event at the moment when defeat made a new message necessary. Those same features limit a different use: the audience’s shouted agreement cannot establish the private morale of Germans outside the hall.
This is the Component 2 AO2 habit: begin with the precise enquiry, connect content and provenance to context, then judge what the source can and cannot show. Calling the speech “biased” adds little. Its openly manipulative purpose increases its value for studying Nazi mobilisation, even while making it weak evidence of representative opinion.
Different groups in the early war
The named groups overlap. A teenage girl could be a BDM member, agricultural worker and daughter of an affluent family; a factory manager might count as an economic elite but live in a bombed city. Comparison works only if the same dimensions are used: material burden, state demands, exposure to danger, access to protection and room to choose.
| Group | Impact in 1939–42 | Essential qualification |
|---|---|---|
| Elites | Senior Party and state figures were expected to organise mobilisation and model confidence. Military officers and elite families also faced front service, bereavement and, increasingly, bombing. Status could nevertheless provide reserved posts, better housing, officer provisions or useful contacts. | “Elite” includes Nazi officials, officers, business leaders and traditional upper-class families whose interests and risks differed. Privilege reduced some burdens; it did not make every elite person safe or loyal. |
| Workers | Rearmament and war production brought secure employment and made skilled labour indispensable. Heavy workers could receive extra rations, but wage control, longer hours, discipline and the destruction of independent trade unions restricted their power. | German workers did not have the same status as foreign forced labourers. Within the German workforce, skill, gender, industry and region changed rations, pay, danger and treatment. |
| Women | Many German women already worked before 1939. A secret directive of 7 September 1939 protected married women not previously employed from compulsory mobilisation, while transferring women already in non-priority jobs. Women also carried household management, care, queues and anxiety for relatives at the front. | “Women stayed at home” is false, but so is the idea that the war suddenly moved all women into factories. Married and unmarried, rural and urban, employed and non-employed women had different combinations of paid and unpaid labour. |
| Youth | School and compulsory Hitler Youth or BDM membership combined ideology with physical training, gendered service and collection or harvest tasks. These institutions reached millions and prepared boys for military service and girls for motherhood and service to the racial community. | Compulsory reach was not uniform belief. Age, sex, religion, family attitudes and local leaders shaped responses ranging from enthusiasm to conformity, boredom and private rejection. |
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account