2K - Germany’s challenges to the Treaty of Versailles: the aims and actions of Hitler
Learn how Hitler combined treaty revision with wider imperial ambitions, how his actions increased Germany's power, and why tactical flexibility did not mean that his ultimate aims were limited to reversing Versailles.
Revisionism and Lebensraum
Hitler could appeal to widespread resentment of Versailles while pursuing ambitions that went much further than correcting its terms. Germans objected to territorial losses, military restrictions and the treatment of their country as a defeated power. Earlier governments had sought revision too, so the desire to change the settlement was not uniquely Nazi.
Hitler wanted freedom to rearm, restoration of great-power status and incorporation of German-speaking populations, including Austria, into a greater Reich. These demands could be presented abroad as equality or national self-determination. However, they were linked to an imperial project in eastern Europe which would subordinate other peoples, destroy the Soviet state and provide land and resources for German dominance.
Lebensraum
“Living space”: in Nazi ideology, territory for German expansion, especially in eastern Europe. It was tied to a racist hierarchy and conquest, rather than simply peaceful migration or the union of German-speaking populations.
Anti-communism and racial ideology were important to this project. Hitler portrayed the Soviet Union as both an ideological enemy and a target for expansion. His ambitions therefore threatened populations and states which had not taken German territory in 1919. The occupation of Czech lands in 1939 later exposed the limits of describing his policy as German national reunification.
This distinction changes causal reasoning. Versailles supplied grievances which helped Hitler gain support and justify early demands. It did not compel him to pursue racial empire or make war his only possible means. A persuasive explanation considers how he used resentment, rather than treating resentment as proof that all subsequent aggression was inevitable.
Breaking the military restrictions
Rearmament changed the means available for Hitler's foreign policy as well as challenging the treaty itself. Versailles limited the army to 100,000 volunteers, prohibited conscription and restricted major weapons. Secret military activity had occurred before 1933, but Hitler accelerated arms production and made rejection of restrictions a central public policy.
Germany withdrew from the Disarmament Conference and the League in October 1933. Hitler argued that other powers' refusal to disarm denied Germany equality. The argument placed pressure on France's demand for security, while withdrawal removed a forum through which Germany might be constrained. It did not immediately make Germany militarily superior; building forces took time.
In March 1935 the regime publicly announced the Luftwaffe and reintroduced conscription, planning an army much larger than the treaty permitted. Britain, France and Italy condemned the breach at Stresa in April. Yet the Anglo-German Naval Agreement of June allowed a German surface fleet at 35 per cent of British tonnage. Britain hoped a negotiated ceiling would reduce the danger of an uncontrolled naval race. Hitler gained recognition of rearmament and benefited from the failure of the Stresa powers to maintain a united position.
On 7 March 1936 German troops entered the demilitarised Rhineland. This breached both Versailles and Germany's later Locarno commitments. The territory was already German; the change was its military status, not annexation of a foreign country. The US Holocaust Memorial Museum's chronology of pre-war expansion records conscription and remilitarisation as distinct challenges.
Control of the Rhineland allowed Germany to fortify its western frontier, made a French advance more difficult and reduced the credibility of French assistance to eastern allies. Hitler also gained prestige by succeeding without a war. The absence of immediate resistance thus affected both physical power and his expectations of future foreign responses.
Territorial gains and greater risk
Hitler's territorial policy moved from gains made within treaty procedures to coercion and conquest. In January 1935 a League-supervised plebiscite overwhelmingly supported the Saar's return to Germany. This was a lawful route provided for by Versailles, although Hitler used the result for regime propaganda. Treating every German gain as an identical treaty violation would erase that important distinction.
The proposed union with Austria had been blocked by the post-war settlement. In July 1934 an Austrian Nazi coup, during which Chancellor Dollfuss was killed, failed, and Mussolini's opposition showed that Italy remained an obstacle. By March 1938 Hitler could pressure the Austrian government without the same Italian resistance. German troops entered on 12 March and union was proclaimed on 13 March. The later manipulated plebiscite did not convert coercion and annexation into a freely negotiated agreement.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account