2A - Relations between Church and State: Henry II and his bishops
After Becket's murder, Henry II needed to rebuild his religious standing while continuing to govern through churchmen. Explore the compromises with the Papacy, the bishops' political role and the disputes that show why reconciliation did not give either king or Church complete control.
Reconciliation after Becket
Henry's reconciliation with the Papacy made renewed cooperation possible without settling every question of jurisdiction.
Thomas Becket's murder in Canterbury Cathedral in December 1170 damaged Henry's reputation as a Christian ruler. Henry had not issued a formal judicial sentence against the archbishop. Nevertheless, the killers were royal knights, and the quarrel that preceded the killing made it impossible for the king to treat the event as politically irrelevant. The Papacy could apply spiritual sanctions and support Becket's supporters; Henry needed to avoid prolonged isolation from the wider Church.
At Avranches in 1172 Henry swore that he had not ordered or desired the murder and reached a settlement with papal representatives. He accepted freedom of appeal to Rome and agreed to abandon customs introduced in his reign that injured the Church. Penitential obligations were part of the settlement. This did not mean that every royal claim recorded in the Constitutions of Clarendon had simply disappeared. The agreement's wording left room for argument about which customs were unlawful and which were genuinely ancient.
The distinction between reconciliation and surrender is important. Henry's attempt to make clerks suffer further secular punishment after proceedings in church courts had been checked. Ecclesiastical jurisdiction remained powerful. But the Crown still controlled many matters involving land and royal rights, influenced episcopal appointments and employed bishops in government. No modern separation of Church and state emerged from the controversy.
Becket was canonised in 1173. In July 1174 Henry visited Canterbury and performed public penance at his shrine during the Great Rebellion. Humiliation at a saint's tomb might seem incompatible with strong kingship, but public repentance could restore legitimacy. The reported capture of William of Scotland shortly afterwards encouraged the view that Henry had regained divine favour. That was an interpretation of events, not proof that his penance caused the military victory.
Reconciliation restored Henry's place within the Christian political order. It limited particular royal ambitions while leaving many practical instruments of royal influence intact.
Henry's religious acts should therefore be understood through their setting. Personal devotion, fear for salvation and political repair could operate together. Historians cannot infer that an act was insincere merely because it also benefited the king.
Bishops as royal partners
Henry continued to rely on bishops because they possessed administrative skills, resources and political connections.
A bishop governed a diocese and supervised its clergy. Bishops were also major landholders, with estates that owed obligations to the Crown. Their education and experience with written documents made them valuable administrators and diplomats. The king's need for clerical expertise survived his conflict with Becket; attempting to govern without churchmen would have deprived him of an important pool of trained servants.
Richard of Ilchester, bishop of Winchester from 1173, combined ecclesiastical rank with royal service. Walter de Coutances likewise served the Crown and became bishop of Lincoln in 1183 before moving to the archbishopric of Rouen in 1184. Such careers linked English and continental administration. Their promotion illustrates royal influence, but a bishop's new position also brought responsibilities to a cathedral, clergy and the wider Church. He was more than an official whom the king could freely dismiss.
Canterbury's archbishops after Becket generally sought a working relationship with Henry. Richard of Dover, archbishop from 1174 to 1184, avoided a renewed confrontation on Becket's scale. Baldwin of Forde became archbishop in 1184 with Henry's backing. Cooperation enabled councils, negotiations and administration to continue. It did not make all bishops agree with one another, nor did it remove their ability to appeal to the pope.
Henry could influence appointments through pressure on cathedral chapters, which formally elected bishops. He also controlled a vacant see's temporalities: its landed revenues and associated rights. Lincoln shows how patronage and pastoral government could diverge. Henry's illegitimate son Geoffrey was bishop-elect from 1173, but was never consecrated; he held the position until resigning in 1182, before Walter's appointment in 1183 and Hugh of Avalon's in 1186. Thus the diocese's prolonged lack of a consecrated bishop did not mean that nobody held its revenues or claimed its office. Revenue, family patronage and pastoral responsibility did not always point towards the same choice.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account