2B - The crushing of the Lancastrian cause: Barnet and Tewkesbury
Explain how Edward IV's campaign in 1471 removed the main military leaders and direct heirs of the Lancastrian cause. Barnet, Tewkesbury and Henry VI's death had different consequences, and together changed Edward's security far more than a single battlefield victory.
Return and Barnet
Edward's return from exile required political recovery before it produced military victory. He landed at Ravenspur in March 1471 with limited forces, initially presenting himself as seeking his ducal inheritance rather than openly demanding the throne. Support grew as he moved south. Clarence's reconciliation with him weakened Warwick's coalition, and Edward entered London, recovering the capital and custody of Henry VI. He could now confront Warwick with a stronger base than he had possessed at landing.
Barnet was fought on 14 April 1471. Fighting began in thick mist, and the armies were not aligned directly opposite one another. This meant that success on one flank did not necessarily reflect the whole battle. The Earl of Oxford's men gained ground but became separated from the rest of Warwick's army; their return contributed to confusion and accusations of treachery. The familiar account of Oxford's star badge being confused with Edward's sun badge belongs to the narrative evidence and should not be treated as an independently proven explanation of everything that happened.
Edward's army held together well enough to win. Warwick and his brother Montagu were killed, removing leaders whose estates, connections and experience had sustained the restoration. This was more important politically than a count of common soldiers killed: the coalition lost organisers who could assemble future resistance. Historic England's Barnet record places mist, confusion and the alliance's breakdown within the battle's significance.
Warwick's death did not end the campaign. Margaret of Anjou and Edward of Westminster landed at Weymouth on the same day, with the potential to gather a separate Lancastrian force. Barnet destroyed Warwick's immediate challenge; it did not yet eliminate the Lancastrian dynasty's heir.
Tewkesbury and the heir
Margaret's army needed to reach further support, especially that associated with Jasper Tudor in Wales. Edward moved west to prevent the Lancastrians from crossing the Severn and combining their forces. The Lancastrians were refused entry to Gloucester and continued to Tewkesbury, where Edward caught them. This shows the importance of movement, towns and river crossings: military power consisted not only of how many men a leader hoped to gather, but also of whether those men could be brought together in time.
The battle on 4 May 1471 ended in a decisive Yorkist victory. The Lancastrians occupied a defensive position with hedges, ditches and difficult approaches. Their position offered protection, but the fighting and the collapse of their formation produced defeat. Edmund Beaufort, Duke of Somerset, was a principal Lancastrian commander. After the battle he and other leaders who had sought refuge were executed.
Edward of Westminster died at Tewkesbury, extinguishing Henry VI's direct male line of succession. Accounts differ about the exact circumstances of his death. It is secure to say that he died in the battle's events; it is not secure to present a detailed dramatic conversation followed by murder as established fact. Margaret was captured and could no longer organise an English campaign for her son.
The two battles removed different resources. Barnet eliminated Warwick and Montagu, while Tewkesbury eliminated the Lancastrian prince and much of the leadership of the remaining field army. The effect was cumulative. Margaret's cause lost both its prospective ruler and many of the people able to fight for him. Historic England's Tewkesbury report supports the significance of the Severn crossing and the pursuit from Weymouth.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account