2D - The development of doctrine and further reform
Edwardian reform changed what churches looked like, what worshippers heard and what the Church officially taught. Follow the connection between the removal of traditional institutions, Cranmer's developing beliefs, and the two Prayer Books, while distinguishing the establishment of Protestant worship from its acceptance by everyone.
Chantries and traditional practices
Edward's government inherited royal supremacy, an English Bible and the destruction of the monasteries, but also Henry's conservative sacramental teaching. Reformers needed to remove legal restrictions and reshape parish religion. Repeal of the Six Articles in 1547 allowed changes that had exposed evangelical clergy to punishment under Henry.
Chantry
An endowment supporting a priest or priests to say masses for named souls, commonly including a founder and family. Chantries connected property, clerical employment and belief in intercession for the dead.
Henry had obtained a Chantries Act in 1545, partly to make ecclesiastical wealth available to the Crown. The Edwardian Chantries Act of 1547 provided the basis for wider suppression, implemented from 1548. Its religious rationale attacked the usefulness of paid intercession for the dead; its financial effect transferred property and revenues. These motives reinforced one another, but neither should be substituted for the other.
The consequences extended beyond masses. Some chantry priests also taught children or performed pastoral work, so suppression disrupted services and employment as well as devotional practice. Pensions and provision for some schools qualified the effects; it would be inaccurate to claim that every educational function vanished. The transfer and sale of property also created beneficiaries with reasons to defend reform irrespective of their private doctrine.
Other changes targeted practices reformers associated with superstition. Royal injunctions and episcopal action promoted preaching and scripture, discouraged devotional images, and led to their removal. Clerical marriage was authorised in 1549. Removal of altars, especially under Ridley and after government intervention in 1550, encouraged the understanding of communion as a shared supper rather than a repeated priestly sacrifice. A wooden communion table was therefore a visible sign carrying doctrinal meaning, not merely a cheaper item of furniture.
Implementation depended on clergy, bishops, parish officials and local resources. Government could prescribe change quickly; equipping churches and altering habitual behaviour took longer. This gap matters when comparing the two Prayer Books: a revised official settlement could advance doctrine without showing that congregations had fully adopted its predecessor. Legal reform cannot be equated with immediate agreement.
Cranmer and developing doctrine
Cranmer supplied learning, language and ecclesiastical authority to reform, but his Edwardian position should not be projected unchanged back into the 1530s. His Eucharistic beliefs developed away from the traditional doctrine Henry had defended. Exchange with English and continental reformers helped him formulate a clearer account of faithful reception of Christ rather than a bodily change in the elements.
Figures such as Nicholas Ridley influenced his thinking, while continental scholars including Martin Bucer at Cambridge and Peter Martyr Vermigli at Oxford contributed to theological debate. Their presence did not make the English settlement a copy of one foreign model: Cranmer worked through the needs of an English Church governed by a monarch and Parliament.
The Book of Homilies of 1547 supplied approved sermons, giving parish clergy a practical means to teach the government's message. Its emphasis on scripture and justification helped spread reform beyond circles capable of writing theological treatises. Cranmer's Defence of the True and Catholic Doctrine of the Sacrament of 1550 explained his rejection of transubstantiation and a corporeal presence located in the bread and wine. He did not simply deny that believers encountered Christ in communion: the nature and means of that encounter were the dispute.
Cranmer's contribution therefore had three connected forms. He developed arguments about belief, translated reform into services ordinary congregations would use, and supplied teaching that clergy could communicate. Ministers and statutes made these changes compulsory, so attributing the whole Reformation to Cranmer alone would neglect political power. Equally, explaining every change as a financial policy would neglect the theology that gave new worship its meaning.
The Prayer Book of 1549
The first Act of Uniformity of 1549 required the new English Book of Common Prayer. Its use began at Whitsun. A single authorised book replaced the varied Latin services used across the country and made worship more intelligible to English speakers. The government intended uniformity to teach and enforce a common religion.
English services were a major practical change, but the book was not simply traditional worship translated word for word. Communion included reception of both bread and wine by the laity. The service prohibited elevation of the consecrated elements, removing a familiar moment associated with adoration. Its organisation encouraged a congregation's participation in an authorised common service rather than treating a private priestly mass as an equivalent form of worship.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account