2M - Challenges and crises: the constitutional crisis
Learn how disputes over Parliament, women's rights, Ireland and industrial relations challenged Liberal authority before the First World War.
The Lords and the budget crisis
Liberal government faced a constitutional problem because a large elected Commons majority did not guarantee control of legislation. The House of Lords had a Conservative majority and could reject bills. Its earlier obstruction of Liberal measures made the issue wider than one budget: reformers questioned whether a hereditary chamber should overrule an elected government.
Lloyd George's People's Budget brought the conflict to a head. The Lords rejected the Finance Bill in November 1909, breaking the established convention that they did not reject the government's budget as a whole. Their opposition included objections to taxation of wealth and land. Liberals portrayed the rejection as defence of privilege; Conservatives argued that radical proposals required an electoral mandate.
The January 1910 election reduced the Liberals from their landslide position to dependence on support from Labour and Irish Nationalists. The budget was then passed, but the power of the Lords remained unsettled. Negotiations failed to produce agreement, and the death of Edward VII in May complicated the royal role. A second election in December again left the Liberals dependent on other parties.
Asquith sought assurance that the King would create enough new peers, if necessary, to overcome resistance in the Lords. George V gave a conditional assurance. The threat mattered because opponents had to choose between accepting reduced powers and risking a transformed chamber. Some peers preferred compromise. The resolution was therefore not simply the automatic victory of a popular government; it depended on elections, parliamentary allies and the Crown's capacity to change the Lords' composition.
What the Parliament Act changed
The Parliament Act of 1911 replaced the Lords' effective veto over most public legislation with powers of delay. Money bills could become law after a month without the Lords' consent. Other qualifying bills could pass without that consent after the required repeated Commons passage over three sessions and a two-year interval. The Act also reduced the maximum life of a Parliament from seven to five years.
Suspensory veto
A power to delay legislation for a specified period rather than block it permanently.
These changes strengthened the elected Commons and made future reform more feasible. They did not abolish the Lords or make Britain fully democratic. The chamber remained unelected, and substantial restrictions on voting persisted. The Act also preserved special protection for a bill extending the maximum life of Parliament.
The political consequences reached beyond the original budget. Irish Nationalists had supported the Liberals because reducing the Lords' power made Home Rule possible. A reform which solved one obstacle therefore increased pressure to address another dispute. Constitutional change shifted power within the state, but it could not guarantee that people outside Westminster would accept Parliament's decisions.
A useful judgement distinguishes the settlement from the causes of the crisis. Conservative obstruction and the budget rejection triggered confrontation; Liberal dependence on other parties and the King's assurance helped resolve it. The result permanently limited a hereditary institution, yet relied on constitutional mechanisms already available within the monarchy and Parliament.
Women and political emancipation
Campaigners for women's suffrage challenged the exclusion of women from parliamentary voting. Women paid taxes, worked and participated in public life, but were denied representation on the same terms as men. Opponents defended separate social roles or claimed that husbands could represent wives' interests. The issue also divided politicians who feared that a particular suffrage proposal would advantage a rival party.
The NUWSS, led by Millicent Fawcett, pursued constitutional methods such as meetings, petitions and lobbying. The WSPU, founded in 1903 by Emmeline Pankhurst and others, sought greater urgency through militant action. Tactics developed from disruption and demonstrations to damage to property and arson. These methods attracted attention but also hostility; the suffrage movement contained different strategies rather than a single united campaign.
The Liberal government did not grant women the vote before the war. Asquith opposed female suffrage, and repeated parliamentary opportunities failed. Frustration strengthened militancy. Imprisoned campaigners used hunger strikes; forcible feeding raised questions about state violence. The 1913 Prisoners (Temporary Discharge for Ill Health) Act, known as the Cat and Mouse Act, allowed weakened prisoners to be released and then rearrested after recovery.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account