2D - Maintaining the Settlement: the threat posed by Mary Queen of Scots
From 1568, Mary, Queen of Scots, gave Catholic opposition a claimant around whom it could organise. Learn how dynastic politics, the Northern Rising and papal excommunication changed the settlement's security, and judge its condition by 1570.
Mary Stuart as a claimant
Mary, Queen of Scots, threatened Elizabeth because she combined a Catholic identity with a claim to the English succession. She descended from Henry VII through his daughter Margaret Tudor. Catholics who rejected the validity of Henry VIII's marriage to Anne Boleyn could regard Elizabeth as illegitimate and Mary as a legitimate alternative.
Mary's position changed over the decade. Her marriage to Francis II had briefly linked her claim to the French monarchy. After his death she returned to Scotland in 1561, where a Protestant Reformation had reduced her religious authority. Her later marriages, the murder of her husband Darnley in 1567 and the political crisis that followed led to her forced abdication in favour of her infant son James VI.
After escaping custody and being defeated at Langside in 1568, Mary crossed into England seeking Elizabeth's help. Elizabeth now faced the problem of a Catholic claimant within her territory. Allowing Mary to return to power might strengthen Catholic influence in Scotland; sending her abroad could give foreign opponents a rallying figure; releasing her freely in England could encourage conspiracy. Detention was a means of managing these risks, but it did not remove them.
Mary could attract people with different objectives. Committed Catholics might want the restoration of Rome. Other nobles might favour a recognised successor, a marriage alliance or a change in the balance of power at court. Elizabeth's unmarried, childless position kept succession unresolved, making Mary's significance extend beyond religion alone.
The English enquiries into the Scottish allegations against Mary did not settle the political problem. Evidence associated with Darnley's murder was contested, and Elizabeth avoided a definitive public resolution that would eliminate all possible policies. Mary remained detained. A prisoner could still function as a focus of hopes and plans even without directly commanding an army.
A renewed Catholic political party
The re-emergence of a Catholic party meant a renewed grouping of people seeking political change connected with Catholic interests, rather than a modern party with a fixed membership and programme. Mary offered such people a possible solution to the succession and a means of altering religious policy.
Plans in 1569 for Mary to marry Thomas Howard, duke of Norfolk, linked her dynastic claim to England's leading nobleman. Norfolk was not simply the commander of a united Catholic movement, and support for the marriage could reflect succession and factional interests as well as religion. Elizabeth's opposition and Norfolk's arrest showed that a marriage plan could threaten royal control even before armed rebellion began.
In the north, Thomas Percy, earl of Northumberland, and Charles Neville, earl of Westmorland, combined Catholic commitments with resentment of the crown's growing influence over their region. Their traditional authority depended on landed power, retainers and local loyalties. The extension of royal government and the influence of rivals threatened that position. Religious and aristocratic grievances therefore reinforced one another.
William Allen's foundation of an English college at Douai in 1568 also showed that Catholic education and organisation could survive abroad. It belongs to the emergence of a more organised challenge, but the major arrival of trained missionary priests came after this option's endpoint. Those later missions should not be treated as already operating at their later scale by 1570.
Not every Catholic joined a political challenge. Many remained loyal or avoided rebellion. Foreign Catholic rulers also had strategic reasons for caution, and hoped-for assistance was not equivalent to a guaranteed intervention. The new Catholic grouping was dangerous because a claimant, influential nobles and religious networks could connect, but its reach and unity had limits.
The Rising of the Northern Earls
Northumberland and Westmorland rose in rebellion in November 1569. The mobilisation drew on their regional affinities and on attachment to Catholic religion. It was a direct challenge to the queen's authority, even where declarations presented the aim as correcting abuses or removing bad counsellors rather than rejecting monarchy itself.
The occupation of Durham and the restoration of Mass in the cathedral made the religious purpose visible. The destruction or rejection of English religious books challenged the authorised liturgy. This symbolism matters: noble grievances alone do not explain why the rebels enacted a public Catholic reversal in a major church.
The rebels also hoped to alter the political position of Mary, Queen of Scots. Yet intentions, declarations and effective action were different. They did not secure her release. The government moved her farther from the immediate area of danger, while rebel support failed to expand into the nationwide coalition needed to overthrow Elizabeth.
The queen's forces, led in the north by the earl of Sussex and reinforced by a larger army, possessed the resources to defeat a movement whose organisation and supplies were limited. Promised or hoped-for foreign help did not arrive in time. The earls retreated, and the rising collapsed in December. Their flight demonstrated the failure to turn regional mobilisation into control of the state.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account