2H - Reaction to change internally and externally: the political clubs
Learn why support for the constitutional settlement divided between 1789 and 1792. Political clubs, the king's flight, repression in Paris and the decision for war changed both the participants and the stakes of the Revolution.
Political clubs and competing revolutions
Political clubs gave people places to debate, organise petitions, circulate news and influence representatives. The Jacobin Club developed from a deputies' association into a society with a network of affiliated clubs across France. Its membership and aims changed over time. Many early Jacobins supported constitutional monarchy; later, the club became associated with a more radical defence of revolution. Treating every Jacobin as a republican from 1789 obscures that development.
The Cordeliers Club, established in 1790, was more accessible to popular activists and defended the right to petition and scrutinise public officials. Figures such as Danton and Desmoulins helped link political discussion with mobilisation. Radical newspapers, including Marat's, could present compromise as weakness or conspiracy. Clubs and newspapers created channels through which events were interpreted, rather than merely reported.
Opposition also came from émigrés, nobles and others who left France and sought a reversal of the Revolution. Refractory clergy and Catholic communities could reject religious reform without sharing every émigré aim. On the other side, poorer urban participants wanted greater political participation and protection from expensive food. The constitutional centre therefore faced pressure from groups seeking both less and more change.
Clubs were not modern parties with disciplined members and fixed programmes. Deputies and activists could change alliances as circumstances changed. Their importance was organisational: a local grievance or royal decision could become a coordinated national argument through meetings, correspondence and publicity. They widened political participation while making it harder for leaders to define one agreed endpoint to the Revolution.
The flight to Varennes and the loss of trust
Louis's actions before 1791 mixed public cooperation with private efforts to recover authority. He attended the Festival of the Federation in July 1790, presenting reconciliation, but disliked restraints on his power and the reorganisation of the Church. Restrictions on his freedom of movement and fear for his family added to his wish to escape the conditions imposed in Paris.
On the night of 20–21 June 1791 the royal family left the Tuileries in disguise. The plan was to reach Montmédy, near the eastern frontier but within France, where loyal troops under Bouillé could give Louis freedom to bargain from a stronger position. It should not be described simply as a completed attempt to cross into Austria. The destination and military protection matter to the political purpose.
Delays and recognition disrupted the journey, and the family was arrested at Varennes on 21 June and returned to Paris on 25 June. The king left a written denunciation of the revolutionary settlement. That made it harder to believe that his earlier cooperation showed genuine acceptance. The flight turned suspicion of the court into a visible act which critics could use as evidence of rejection.
Moderate deputies feared that removing Louis would destroy the constitutional project and create an uncontrolled republic. They retained the monarchy, using the claim that the king had been taken away rather than freely abandoning the nation. Radicals demanded abdication or a republic. Thus Varennes did not immediately abolish monarchy; it widened the gulf between a settlement dependent on the king and activists who no longer trusted him. Drouet's account of the arrest records recognition and improvised local action; his own involvement shapes what he could observe and how he presents it.
The Champ de Mars and the moderate-radical rupture
After Varennes, debate about the king divided constitutional supporters. In July 1791 defenders of the monarchy left the Jacobins to establish the Feuillants, associated with figures such as Barnave and Lafayette. They wanted to close the revolutionary process around a constitutional settlement. The split preceded the decisive shooting at the Champ de Mars, although both belonged to the same crisis over monarchy and popular pressure.
On 17 July demonstrators gathered at the Champ de Mars in Paris to support a petition against retaining Louis. Following disorder and the declaration of martial law, the National Guard under Lafayette fired on the crowd, killing demonstrators. The exact number is disputed, so the event's significance should not depend on one supposedly certain death toll.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account