2S - Social developments: rising living standards
Learn how affluence changed everyday life between 1951 and 1964, and why differences of class, gender, race and age continued to create tension.
Living standards and consumption
Rising real wages and high employment gave many households more money to spend beyond basic necessities. New housing, better access to services and the end of food rationing in 1954 made improvement visible. Televisions, washing machines, refrigerators and cars became attainable to a widening range of families. Hire purchase, paying in instalments rather than buying outright, brought some goods within reach earlier, though it also created debts.
Consumerism
A growing emphasis on buying goods and services as a source of comfort, status and identity. It describes a cultural priority as well as an increase in spending.
Manufacturers and advertisers encouraged households to measure success through possessions. ITV, beginning in 1955, brought commercial advertising into television. Ownership could change behaviour: a television encouraged evenings at home; a car widened access to work, shops and holidays; a washing machine reduced some of the time needed for domestic work. These were changes in opportunities, rather than automatic transformations of every household's life.
Affluence was distributed unequally. Pensioners, poorly paid workers and families in overcrowded housing could remain insecure while national averages improved. Housing construction did not immediately clear every slum, and prosperity in expanding southern industries contrasted with difficulties in some older industrial areas. A claim that Britain became affluent is stronger when it means a widening pattern of material improvement than when it implies that poverty disappeared.
Class and the Establishment
Greater purchasing power could blur some visible differences between classes without redistributing power. A skilled manual worker could own a car and television while remaining distinct from a professional family in education, occupation, accent, housing and prospects. Council tenancy and home ownership also affected security and identity. Class was therefore more than a measure of possessions.
The Establishment referred to networks of influential people in politics, senior administration, the armed forces, business and the churches, often linked by public schools, elite universities and social connections. It was a description of influence, not a single organisation issuing instructions. Churchill, Eden, Macmillan and Home all came from privileged backgrounds. Such leadership could reassure voters who associated status with experience, but also invite criticism that opportunities and authority were unfairly inherited.
Education illustrated both mobility and continuity. The eleven-plus could give able working-class children access to grammar-school routes, but early selection and differences in family support left many children with unequal prospects. Expanding higher education, supported by the Robbins report in 1963, widened opportunity without immediately making universities socially representative.
New fiction, theatre and satire questioned deference. John Osborne's Look Back in Anger in 1956 dramatised frustration with class and conventional respectability; That Was the Week That Was, first broadcast in 1962, ridiculed public figures. These examples show a more public willingness to challenge authority, not that most people abandoned respect for institutions. The Profumo affair in 1963 made elite conduct harder to defend. Social tensions became politically important because privilege appeared alongside claims that prosperity was available to everyone.
Women and domestic expectations
Women gained some opportunities while the expectation that a married woman should prioritise home and children remained powerful. Growing clerical, retail and service work increased paid employment, including part-time work compatible with domestic responsibilities. Labour shortages helped employers recruit women, but occupational segregation, lower pay and assumptions about women's careers limited independence.
Domestic appliances could reduce physical effort without redistributing the responsibility for housework. Advertising often sold modern products through the image of an efficient housewife. Higher household income could therefore reinforce a comfortable domestic ideal as well as help women enter paid work. A washing machine was a useful improvement; it was not evidence that husbands and wives now shared labour equally.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account