2P - Social developments: the destruction of rightists, class enemies and rectification campaigns
Learn how campaigns reshaped social status, women’s lives and welfare, and why collectivisation brought both promises of support and new forms of coercion culminating in famine.
Class labels and rectification
Communist rule divided society into politically approved people and suspect classes or groups. Landlord and counter-revolutionary classifications could survive the destruction of the economic position that originally justified them. Political background affected access to employment, education and trust. Members of a labelled family could face disadvantages even when they had not committed an offence themselves.
Rectification meant correcting ideas and conduct to align them with the party’s requirements. Meetings, criticism and self-criticism required people to identify their supposed errors. These methods could expose corruption or poor administration, but also rewarded conformity and made neighbours, colleagues and family relationships instruments of political supervision.
The 1955 campaign against the writer Hu Feng shows how a cultural disagreement became a security allegation. Mao’s preface and editorial notes of May–June 1955 classified Hu and his associates as counter-revolutionaries. The accompanying campaign against hidden counter-revolutionaries widened suspicion within institutions. The label should be attributed to the regime: the document proves that Mao promoted the accusation, not that literary independence was evidence of a conspiracy.
The Anti-Rightist campaign of 1957 extended punishment to many who had responded to invitations to criticise the party. Dismissal, forced labour, detention and public humiliation removed critics from influential positions and frightened those who remained. Destruction of rightists as a social or political group did not mean that every labelled person was executed; the forms of repression varied.
Rectification campaign
A party-led effort to correct people’s ideas, behaviour or organisational practices. It can involve investigation, political study, criticism and punishment; its stated aim does not establish that its accusations are true.
Women’s rights and their limits
The 1950 Marriage Law remained a foundation of social change during the 1950s. It established free choice of partners, monogamy and equal rights, challenging arranged marriage, forced marriage and male domination of divorce. Women’s organisations and publicity campaigns encouraged women to claim these rights. The law therefore offered a legal route against practices previously defended as family custom.
Implementation was uneven. Families could resist divorce, while local cadres might favour household stability over an individual woman’s choice. Zhou Enlai’s 1951 directive on enforcing the law, pp. 65–68, acknowledged interference with freedom of marriage and mistreatment of women. Its instructions help explain why further mobilisation was necessary: legislation alone had not removed entrenched authority.
Women also entered paid and collective work. Employment and participation in the Women’s Federation could widen social networks and reduce dependence on husbands. Commune nurseries and kitchens promised to reduce domestic duties during the Great Leap Forward. Yet women often retained household and childcare responsibilities alongside agricultural or industrial labour. Work-point systems could value women’s labour below men’s, and senior leadership remained predominantly male.
Legal equality, economic participation and everyday independence should therefore be assessed separately. More work could produce income and public recognition, but it could also mean a heavier combined burden when childcare or food services failed.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account