2L - Fascist society: relations between the Fascist regime and the Church
Assess how cooperation with the Church and Fascist organisations changed life for women, young people, peasants and workers, and judge how far Italian society had been Fascistised by 1940.
The Lateran settlement and mutual advantage
The Church offered Mussolini both an opportunity for legitimacy and a competing source of loyalty. The Roman Question was the conflict created when the Italian state annexed Rome in 1870 and ended the Pope's territorial rule. Popes had not accepted the settlement, leaving Church and state divided. Mussolini's early concessions and anti-socialism encouraged negotiation, but the Church's support was based on its own interests rather than surrender of all authority to Fascism.
The Lateran Pacts, signed on 11 February 1929 by Mussolini and Cardinal Pietro Gasparri, comprised three connected arrangements. The treaty recognised the sovereign Vatican City and settled the territorial dispute; the Pope accepted the Kingdom of Italy with Rome as its capital. A financial convention provided compensation for the loss of former papal territories. A concordat, an agreement regulating Church–state relations, protected the Church's position in areas including marriage and religious education. Catholicism was reaffirmed as the state religion.
The settlement was a major achievement for Mussolini. It associated him with ending a long national conflict and could reassure Catholics who had distrusted an anticlerical movement. The Church gained sovereignty, resources and recognised rights. The bargain therefore improved the regime's legitimacy while preserving an institution with authority beyond it. The original Italian Lateran documents show the distinct territorial, financial and religious arrangements.
This cooperation should not be turned into proof that all Catholics became Fascists or that the Church became a party department. Clergy and believers varied in their attitudes. Their religious identity could reinforce conservative accommodation but also preserve loyalties and organisations which the regime could not simply replace.
Conflict over Catholic youth
The dispute over youth showed that the Lateran settlement did not remove conflict over who would shape society. Catholic Action organised lay Catholics for religious activity under Church leadership. Its youth associations overlapped with the age groups and social spaces the Fascists sought to dominate. In 1931 Fascist attacks and the suppression of Catholic youth clubs provoked Pius XI to issue the encyclical Non abbiamo bisogno on 29 June.
The following is an authentic short extract from the original Italian encyclical, translated here for this lesson. The ellipses mark the boundaries of the selected phrase, not missing material needed for the explanation. It is the Pope's accusation about the regime's intention:
“...to monopolise young people completely, from earliest childhood to adulthood, entirely and exclusively for the benefit of a party and a regime...”
Pius XI, Non abbiamo bisogno, 29 June 1931, section III. Original Italian text published by the Holy See; original educational translation of this short phrase. Read the original encyclical.
For an enquiry into conflict over youth, the content is valuable because it identifies control of upbringing as the issue. Its provenance adds value: the Pope led the institution whose youth associations were attacked and publicly asserted a rival authority. The 1931 context, only two years after the settlement, helps explain the urgent defensive language. The accusation reveals the Church's position and perceived threat; it cannot by itself establish how completely every young person was controlled. Its purpose was to defend Catholic organisation, so other evidence is needed to judge the regime's success.
A compromise later in 1931 allowed Catholic Action to survive with restrictions and an emphasis on religious, non-party activity. The Church retained a space for organisation; the regime limited its political and social reach. Cooperation therefore resumed without resolving the underlying competition for allegiance. This is a stronger explanation than treating the encyclical as proof that the Church launched a united campaign to overthrow Mussolini.
Women, welfare and motherhood
Fascism sought to organise women while defining their central duty as motherhood and service to the nation. The Battle for Births, launched in 1927, linked a larger population to imperial strength and future military manpower. Rewards for large families, pressure on unmarried men and restrictions on women's employment promoted an ideal of the male breadwinner and prolific mother. This was a political attempt to shape family life, not simply advice about private choices.
The Fasci Femminili, Fascist women's groups, involved women in welfare, propaganda and community work. The Massaie Rurali organisation recruited rural women, promoting domestic skills, hygiene, child care and attachment to life in the countryside. It brought the regime into communities which urban party politics might reach less easily. The Opera Nazionale Maternità e Infanzia (ONMI), established in 1925, provided maternity and child welfare. Such assistance could offer real help while presenting the state as guardian of a prescribed social role.
Organised activity gave some women experience, status and public responsibilities, yet within a hierarchy led by men. Domestic expectations and barriers in employment restricted independence. Poor families could still need women's earnings, while work in agriculture, factories and homes persisted despite rhetoric about withdrawal from employment. These contradictions explain why propaganda could not determine every household's behaviour.
The demographic ambition was not achieved as the regime intended: birth rates continued to face pressures from urbanisation, economic insecurity and family decisions. Membership of a women's organisation therefore cannot be used as proof that members adopted the desired family size. Social policy must be assessed through both opportunities provided and freedoms constrained. Treccani's discussion of women's experience identifies this gap between public mobilisation and private behaviour.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account