2A - Social and economic developments: towns and trade, the social condition of England by 1189
England became more commercially active during Henry II's reign, but most people still lived through agriculture and local obligations. Learn how towns, trade and money connected the kingdom, and why their growth brought different opportunities and pressures to different social groups.
Towns and their hinterlands
Towns grew because they concentrated exchange and services needed by the surrounding countryside.
Most people in late-twelfth-century England lived outside towns. Agricultural production supplied food, wool, hides and other materials; urban households supplied crafts, trade and specialised services. A town's hinterland was the surrounding area from which it drew goods and customers. Neither town nor countryside was economically self-sufficient. A farmer selling grain could use the proceeds to buy tools, salt or cloth; an urban baker depended on rural grain supplies.
Population growth and the extension of cultivation supported demand, while markets connected producers with buyers. Weekly markets met regular needs. Fairs brought a wider range of buyers and sellers together on particular occasions, sometimes attracting merchants from much further away. Rivers and coastal shipping carried bulky goods more cheaply than movement entirely by land. Roads remained important for reaching local markets and inland centres.
Towns developed around ports, established settlements, castles, churches and centres of government. London combined political importance with the Thames and overseas trade. Winchester retained significance through royal and ecclesiastical institutions. Other places remained much smaller. A large city's wealth should not be projected onto every settlement described as a borough.
Borough
A town possessing recognised legal privileges. The particular privileges and degree of local independence varied from place to place.
Royal and aristocratic encouragement could make urban growth profitable for a lord. A market attracted customers who paid tolls; new house plots generated rents. Bishops and monasteries could benefit in similar ways. Granting privileges was therefore compatible with lordship. It could promote settlement and commerce while creating a predictable source of income for the authority issuing the grant.
Growth did not make towns socially equal. Wealthy merchants could own property and influence local decisions, while poorer workers depended on wages, small workshops or insecure employment. Trade enlarged the resources of some households without guaranteeing that all residents became prosperous.
Trade, money and privilege
Commercial growth depended on connections and enforceable arrangements as well as the availability of goods.
English wool supplied continental textile producers, especially in Flanders. Wine entered through connections with France, including Henry's southern territories. Ports such as London and Southampton linked regional production to overseas markets. These exchanges made the Channel a route of communication as well as a political boundary. They also made merchants vulnerable to piracy, interrupted shipping and war between rulers whose lands their businesses connected.
Merchants needed recognised weights, secure transactions and ways of resolving disputes. Coinage provided a shared means of payment. Henry introduced the short-cross silver penny in 1180, replacing an earlier type. Surviving coins provide material evidence of royal monetary authority: moneyers and mints operated within a coinage that the Crown regulated. A coin's survival does not reveal the income of a typical family, but it helps establish the instruments through which payments were made. A British Museum coin catalogue dates an early short-cross penny to about 1180–1182.
Charters could confirm freedoms from particular tolls or allow townspeople to administer specified affairs. A burgess was a recognised member of a borough community; burgesses' privileges did not automatically extend to all people living in the town. Paying a fixed annual sum to the Crown could make the community responsible for collection instead of leaving every demand to an outside officer. But privileges differed between towns, and the king retained financial and political interests.
Merchant and craft associations helped organise economic life. They could regulate membership, production or access to local trading opportunities. Such arrangements protected insiders, yet could exclude outsiders and poorer people. Collective privilege was a form of independence for a group, rather than general freedom for the entire population.
Credit also facilitated exchange. Both Christian and Jewish lenders operated in England, although restrictions and religious attitudes shaped their activities differently. Lending helped people meet obligations or finance projects; interest and debt could also generate resentment. Jewish communities had religious, family and intellectual lives beyond moneylending, and should not be reduced to one economic function.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account