2A - England without Richard: the absentee king
Richard spent only a few months of his reign in England, yet the kingdom continued to supply his government and wars. Explore how delegated rule worked, why it broke into conflict under Longchamp, and how John’s ambitions and Hubert Walter’s administration tested the strength of royal authority.
Governing an absent king's realm
Richard's absence required trusted representatives to exercise powers that still belonged to the king.
The king's household and government did not have to remain in one place, and Henry II had often governed across the Channel. Richard's extended crusading absence nevertheless created an unusual risk. He could send instructions, but messages took time, and local disputes might develop before he could respond. His officials needed enough power to act, while avoiding the appearance that they were replacing their master.
A justiciar was a principal royal administrator who could supervise government in the king's absence. Sheriffs collected revenue and exercised local authority; the Exchequer checked accounts; courts and royal writs supplied legal remedies. These institutions made continued rule possible without Richard personally hearing every case or supervising every payment.
Delegated authority
Power exercised by a representative on behalf of its holder. A royal deputy's authority depended on the king's commission, but effective rule also required local cooperation.
Richard initially entrusted important responsibilities to William Longchamp, bishop of Ely and chancellor, and Hugh de Puiset, bishop of Durham. Their clerical offices did not make political rivalry impossible. Both possessed resources and experience, but dividing responsibilities created uncertainty over who could direct whom. Longchamp gained the dominant position and limited Hugh's role.
Prince John presented another problem. Richard gave him extensive lands and status, while attempting to keep him from undermining the government during the crusade. John was the king's brother and a possible successor, not merely an ordinary magnate. Officials could insist on their royal commission, but John could claim the influence of family and heirship. Because Richard had no legitimate child, questions about his survival and succession remained politically powerful.
Absence therefore tested two kinds of strength: administrative capacity and political agreement. A system might collect money and process cases effectively while its leading representatives quarrelled about authority. The survival of royal offices did not guarantee that everybody accepted the person currently directing them.
Longchamp and the collapse of cooperation
Longchamp's concentration of power made his government effective in some respects and politically vulnerable in others.
Longchamp combined several positions: bishop, chancellor, royal administrator and papal legate. A legate acted as a representative of the pope. These offices added religious as well as royal authority to his commands. Control of important castles and the promotion of his supporters increased his practical power, but could alarm other bishops and nobles who felt excluded.
His conflict with Hugh de Puiset demonstrated the danger of competing commissions and personal rivalry. Longchamp briefly detained Hugh in 1190 and asserted superiority over him. His demands and treatment of opponents attracted complaints. Hostile accounts portrayed his conduct as arrogant and his household as expensive. Such accusations should be examined as political evidence, rather than accepted as a neutral description of every part of his administration.
Richard responded by sending Walter de Coutances, archbishop of Rouen, to England in 1191 with authority to deal with the crisis. This mattered because Coutances could claim a fresh royal commission. Opponents of Longchamp could seek a change in the king's representative while continuing to profess loyalty to Richard.
The crisis intensified when Longchamp's men arrested Geoffrey, archbishop of York and Richard's half-brother, at Dover in September 1191. An affront to an archbishop, combined with its circumstances in a religious setting, gave other churchmen a reason to oppose Longchamp beyond personal rivalry. John joined the coalition against him. By October, Longchamp had lost sufficient support to be removed from control and leave England; Coutances took charge.
William of Newburgh describes Longchamp in strongly condemnatory terms and praises the resulting change. His account reveals how opponents justified removing a royal deputy: they presented the action as restoring proper government for Richard. It does not prove that all their own motives were disinterested or that Longchamp had ceased to act under royal authority. Book IV, chapters 14–18, supplies the contemporary narrative.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account