2C - The spread of radical reformation: Carstadt and the Zwickau prophets

2C - The spread of radical reformation: Carstadt and the Zwickau prophets

Luther's challenge to Rome opened questions about who could reform the Church and how quickly change should occur. This lesson explains why former allies divided over worship, revelation and salvation, and why humanist criticism did not necessarily lead to Protestantism.

Reforming Wittenberg during Luther's absence

Luther's absence after the Diet of Worms left other reformers making practical decisions in Wittenberg in 1521–1522. Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt, called Carstadt in the specification, was a university theologian and an early ally. He supported clerical marriage, communion with both bread and wine for the laity and major changes to the Mass. These changes challenged the priest's distinctive sacrificial role and gave congregations a more direct place in worship.

Karlstadt's argument for removing religious images went further than criticism of particular abuses. He interpreted biblical prohibitions of idolatry as requiring their removal from churches. Candles, offerings and kneeling before images seemed to him evidence that worshippers transferred honour from God to material objects. An image that a Catholic regarded as a reminder of a saint could therefore look to Karlstadt like a rival to God. Iconoclasm was the destruction or removal of religious images; it arose from an argument about true worship, although removal could also cause disorder and destroy objects valued by parishioners.

Reform involved the town council as well as preachers. The Wittenberg ordinance of January 1522 brought worship and poor relief under civic regulation. This matters because radical change did not always begin as an attack on all government: Karlstadt could seek official action while advocating rapid religious transformation. His argument against images, published in 1522 shows the theological reasoning behind the dispute.

The Zwickau prophets and religious authority

The men known as the Zwickau prophets introduced a different challenge when they came to Wittenberg in late 1521. Figures associated with the group included Nikolaus Storch and Markus Stübner. They claimed direct inspiration from the Holy Spirit and questioned established religious practices, including infant baptism. Their significance lay less in their brief stay than in the issue they raised: could an inward revelation authorise someone to override university theologians, clergy or written interpretations of Scripture?

Luther appealed to Scripture against papal authority, but this did not mean he accepted every person's claim to speak for God. If private revelation could establish religious truth, there would be no common written authority by which to test competing claims. The prophets initially caused uncertainty among Wittenberg reformers, including Melanchthon, rather than creating a single united radical party.

Radical Reformation

A varied set of reform movements that challenged the limits of established Catholic and Protestant churches, for example over baptism, spiritual revelation or the relationship between church and government. It was not one organisation with one programme.

Thomas Müntzer had worked in Zwickau and later developed a revolutionary religious programme, but the prophets, Müntzer and Karlstadt should not be treated as interchangeable. Different objections to the old Church could lead to different ideas about authority and social change. Nor should a question about infant baptism in 1521 be assumed to imply every doctrine of the later Anabaptists.

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account