1J - The role and influence on attitudes to empire of explorers, missionaries, traders, colonial administrators
Explorers, missionaries, traders and colonial administrators helped shape British knowledge and images of empire between c1857 and c1890. Learn how their activities could encourage expansion and influence opinion, while distinguishing heroic public stories from the people and conflicts those stories left out.
Exploration and public authority
Explorers supplied information about routes, rivers and resources which could interest merchants, governments and geographical societies. Books, lectures, maps and newspaper reporting turned overseas journeys into public events. Presenting a traveller as a courageous individual made an unfamiliar region accessible to readers, but could also make British intervention seem necessary or desirable.
David Livingstone's combination of missionary work and exploration was especially influential. His published account of travels in southern Africa appeared in 1857, and his later journeys maintained public attention. He linked Christianity and commerce with opposition to the slave trade. In this argument, legitimate trade would provide alternatives to slave trading while mission work would transform society. This was a programme for religious and economic change, not simply geographical curiosity. Livingstone Online, life and expeditions.
Henry Morton Stanley's search for Livingstone in 1871 demonstrates the connection between exploration and journalism. Newspaper sponsorship made an explorer's journey a saleable story. Stanley subsequently worked to advance Leopold II's interests in the Congo; a celebrated explorer in British public culture was therefore not necessarily an agent of British annexation. Distinguishing public reputation from political employment avoids treating exploration as a single national enterprise.
An explorer's information could make a route seem available to commerce. That information did not automatically produce conquest: capital, decisions by governments and responses from local rulers still mattered. Exploration was often an enabling influence rather than a sufficient cause of expansion.
African knowledge behind exploration
European travellers depended on African guides, interpreters, porters, traders and rulers. Their ability to move, obtain food and understand local conditions often rested on knowledge and networks which already existed. Describing them as discovering an empty or unknown continent erases the difference between a place being unfamiliar to Europeans and unfamiliar to its inhabitants.
Livingstone's companions Abdullah Susi and James Chuma helped preserve his journals and transport his body to the coast after his death in 1873. They also contributed to accounts of his final travels. Their work made possible the public commemoration of Livingstone in Britain. The Royal Geographical Society's collection records both their journey and their subsequent visit to Britain. RGS, Livingstone tree records.
This changes how the influence of individuals should be assessed. Livingstone had exceptional access to British readers and institutions, but his achievements were collaborative. African participants could cooperate for wages, religious commitments, personal loyalty or political advantage. Cooperation did not mean agreement with every later imperial use of an expedition's findings.
The public story nevertheless tended to elevate a recognisable European hero. His portraits, funeral and publications could symbolise sacrifice and duty. A historian must ask whose contribution was visible, whose knowledge was appropriated and how the story helped justify Britain's supposed authority to intervene. These questions test a representation against evidence rather than dismissing every account simply because it was written by a European.
Missionaries and humanitarian claims
Missionaries sought religious conversion, established schools and translated texts, and often circulated reports through churches and mission societies in Britain. Those networks reached audiences who might have little direct commercial interest in empire. Stories of suffering or hostility could lead supporters to demand protection for missions and converts, drawing government into a region.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account