2T - Gorbachev as leader: personality, aims and power base
Learn why Gorbachev tried to renew Soviet socialism, how his leadership supported reform, and why domestic restructuring became connected to withdrawal from Afghanistan and the ending of the Cold War.
A reformer within the party
Mikhail Gorbachev became General Secretary in March 1985 after the deaths of Brezhnev, Andropov and Chernenko within less than three years. At 54, he offered energy and continuity of leadership after a period of elderly, often ill leaders. He had risen through the Communist Party in Stavropol and joined the Politburo in 1980. His experience of agriculture and regional administration acquainted him with shortages, unreliable reporting and the gap between plans and results. He was a product of the system rather than an outsider seeking to abolish it.
Gorbachev was articulate, confident and willing to meet ordinary citizens publicly. His legal education and readiness to discuss problems distinguished his style from Brezhnev's increasingly ceremonial rule. His wife Raisa's visible public role also signalled change. Yet personality explains only part of his opportunity: Andropov had promoted younger officials, while the leadership recognised that stagnation and technological backwardness required action.
His initial aim was to make socialism productive, participatory and morally credible. He wanted a stronger USSR capable of sustaining superpower status without exhausting its economy. In 1985 he emphasised acceleration, discipline and improved management, rather than a fully formed plan for capitalism or independence for the republics.
His power depended on support within the Politburo and control over senior appointments. He replaced many officials, promoted allies such as Alexander Yakovlev and appointed Eduard Shevardnadze foreign minister. Their support helped him widen the reform agenda. However, party officials, economic ministries, the military and security institutions retained interests of their own. Holding the highest party office gave him considerable authority; it did not guarantee that orders would be carried out or that allies would accept every later reform.
Why the reforms became connected
The economy's problems were structural as well as managerial. Central planning could mobilise resources for heavy industry, but rewarded fulfilment of quantitative targets more reliably than quality or innovation. Managers concealed difficulties, ministries defended their powers and workers had weak incentives to improve productivity. Defence commitments, the Afghan war and competition with the West placed further demands on resources. Falling oil prices in 1986 reduced earnings from an important export. These pressures encouraged reform, but do not establish that collapse was inevitable in 1985.
Perestroika
Restructuring: Gorbachev's attempt to change economic management and, increasingly, the political institutions obstructing economic renewal.
Glasnost, or openness, was intended to reveal problems that secrecy concealed. Public criticism could expose corruption, challenge misleading reports and put pressure on conservative officials. It also aimed to rebuild trust after decades of official claims that contradicted everyday experience. Gorbachev initially expected openness to strengthen socialism through correction, rather than destroy belief in it.
Demokratizatsiya, or democratisation, sought greater participation and accountability. From 1987, competitive selection and political reform were increasingly seen as ways of weakening officials who resisted restructuring. The original intention was to renew socialist government, not immediately to establish unrestricted multiparty competition.
These policies were connected because an economic instruction could fail if officials had both the power and incentive to conceal non-compliance. Openness might expose obstruction; elections might replace obstructive officials. However, each step widened the range of people who could criticise the leadership. Discussion of shortages could become discussion of Stalinist crimes, national grievances or the legitimacy of Communist rule itself. Gorbachev's policies therefore contained a tension between mobilisation from above and political activity escaping central direction.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account