1L - Political authority 1929–1945: the collapse of Weimar democracy and the establishment of the one-party authoritarian Nazi State
Nazi dictatorship emerged through economic crisis, the erosion of parliamentary government and deliberate political decisions. This lesson traces the roles of Hindenburg and Hitler, distinguishing the appointment of a chancellor from the destruction of democratic authority.
Depression and electoral radicalisation
The international Depression after 1929 undermined a German recovery partly dependent on foreign lending. Falling demand, financial difficulties and unemployment intensified insecurity. People questioned whether democratic parties could protect them. The crisis affected workers, farmers, businesses and middle-class households differently, so support for extremism cannot be reduced to a single group or grievance.
The Nazi Party exploited these conditions through extensive local organisation, Hitler's campaigning, propaganda and promises of national revival. It presented itself as an alternative to weak parliamentary bargaining, opposed Communism and falsely blamed Jews and other alleged enemies for Germany's problems. Its appeal could combine apparently incompatible promises to different audiences: protecting farmers, creating work, defending property and overcoming class division. The SA's violence and public presence helped project activism and intimidate opponents.
The Nazis rose from 2.6% of the vote in 1928 to 18.3% in September 1930 and 37.3% in July 1932. This transformed their bargaining power and made them the largest party. They never won an absolute majority in a free national election. In November 1932 their share fell to 33.1%, while the KPD also gained support during the crisis. Electoral radicalisation damaged the centre, but a Nazi dictatorship was not a direct democratic mandate from a majority of voters.
The Depression explains why Nazi opportunities expanded, not why Hitler necessarily had to become chancellor. Other anti-parliamentary outcomes were possible, and conservative politicians pursued them. To explain January 1933, economic and electoral pressures must be connected to the decisions of those controlling appointments.
The Bundestag's election record distinguishes the Nazi rise from a majority mandate.
Presidential government and Hindenburg
Parliamentary government weakened before Hitler entered office. Müller's coalition fell in March 1930 amid disagreement over unemployment insurance funding. Hindenburg appointed Heinrich Brüning, whose government lacked a secure Reichstag majority. Brüning pursued deflationary measures, including expenditure cuts and taxation, hoping to stabilise finances and improve Germany's international position. These policies reduced demand and increased hardship during an already severe contraction.
When parliamentary support failed, Hindenburg issued emergency decrees under Article 48. If the Reichstag opposed a decree, the president could dissolve it and call elections. Repeated use of this combination moved the centre of effective authority from coalition negotiation towards the presidency and its advisers. The constitution remained, but the practice of government was changing. This was a political choice made within available powers, not an automatic mechanical result of proportional representation.
Hindenburg dismissed Brüning in 1932 and appointed Franz von Papen, then Kurt von Schleicher. Neither built a durable parliamentary majority. Papen's removal of the elected Prussian government in July 1932 weakened an important democratic stronghold and showed how presidential power could displace federal democracy. Hindenburg was re-elected president in 1932 against Hitler, with many republicans supporting him to keep Hitler out. Their votes did not make him a committed defender of parliamentary rule.
Hindenburg's role was therefore more than that of a passive old man. He authorised a sequence of presidential governments and accepted interventions undermining parliamentary authority. Conservative advisers and political rivals influenced him, but his constitutional powers made his decisions consequential. Hitler benefited from a system already weakened by politicians who hoped to rule without the normal parliamentary basis.
Appointment through conservative calculation
Hindenburg initially refused Hitler's demand to head a government. Nazi electoral strength gave Hitler influence, but appointment depended on presidential consent. Hitler would not accept a subordinate role that deprived him of the chancellorship. Schleicher's attempts to find a wider political base failed, while Papen negotiated a different solution with Hitler and conservative allies.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account