2B - Shifting loyalties and the Lancastrian revival: Wakefield
Learn how the Lancastrians recovered after Northampton, killed York at Wakefield and regained Henry VI at the second Battle of St Albans. Assess why military revival failed to produce a secure political settlement.
The revival in the north
Lancastrian resistance survived because Northampton had removed the king’s immediate defenders without destroying all his supporters. Margaret and Prince Edward remained free, and the Act of Accord gave them an urgent reason to resist: accepting it would surrender the prince’s inheritance. Great lords with northern estates and affinities could gather a force beyond the Yorkists’ direct control.
Henry Beaufort, Duke of Somerset, Henry Percy, Earl of Northumberland, and Lord Clifford had further reasons for hostility. Their fathers had died at the first Battle of St Albans. Revenge and protection of their families’ interests overlapped with loyalty to Lancaster. Other participants might seek patronage, defend local relationships or avoid being dominated by a rival affinity. An explanation of shifting loyalty should identify these interests rather than assume that every soldier chose a side from conviction about hereditary right.
York went north with Salisbury in December 1460 to confront the gathering threat. Edward, Earl of March, remained concerned with the Welsh Marches, and Warwick held the centre with Henry. The Yorkists’ resources were divided across several fronts. Control of the king in London did not prevent opponents recruiting elsewhere, so the Act of Accord needed military enforcement as well as parliamentary authority.
Wakefield and York’s death
York and Salisbury reached Sandal Castle near Wakefield with a force smaller than the opposing Lancastrian army. Their position presented a supply problem as well as a military one: shelter in a castle could not provide indefinite security without provisions and reinforcement. On 30 December 1460, York’s force left the castle and was defeated at Wakefield.
Why York gave battle remains uncertain. Accounts and later explanations include the need for supplies, deception or a broken truce, and an attempt to escape or overcome the surrounding force. These possibilities should not be combined into a confident story of one proven trick. The reliable outcome is that York died, his son Edmund, Earl of Rutland, was killed and Salisbury was captured and executed. The Yorkist leadership suffered a severe loss.
Later narratives dramatised the deaths through speeches and revenge scenes. Edward Hall wrote decades after the event, and his description of Rutland as a young child is misleading: Rutland was seventeen. Such details require testing against chronology rather than acceptance because a narrative is vivid. The deaths themselves are secure even when the exact circumstances are contested.
Edward inherited York’s position as duke and leader of the dynastic claim. Warwick also survived, preserving the Neville leadership. Wakefield therefore destroyed one army and removed major leaders without eliminating the Yorkist cause. The new leaders could use the killings and Lancastrian resistance to argue that peaceful succession under the Act of Accord was no longer possible.
The second Battle of St Albans
The Lancastrian army advanced south after Wakefield. Warwick gathered a force to oppose it and brought Henry VI from London into his camp. Keeping the king with him preserved the claim that the Yorkists governed through royal authority; it may also have been intended to make the king’s supporters reluctant to attack an army containing him.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account