1L - Economic developments: industrial expansion
Learn how Germany became a major industrial and trading power between 1871 and 1914, why older and newer industries reinforced each other, and how growth distributed wealth unevenly.
Conditions for industrial expansion
Germany's rapid industrial expansion after 1871 built on developments that preceded unification. The Zollverein, or customs union, had already reduced many internal trade barriers. Railways and industrial districts existed before the empire. Unification strengthened this process through common national institutions, currency and legal arrangements, rather than creating an industrial economy from nothing.
Coal deposits in the Ruhr, Saar and Upper Silesia supplied energy for industry, while iron, engineering skills and transport links supported production. Railways connected mines, factories and ports. They did more than carry finished goods: construction demanded iron and steel, and cheaper transport allowed firms to buy raw materials and sell across larger markets. This is a reinforcing relationship between demand, production and distribution.
Population growth enlarged the workforce and domestic market. Movement to industrial towns made wage labour more important, while improving education and technical training supplied skills. Universities, technical institutions and company laboratories were especially valuable to science-based industries. Skilled labour therefore mattered alongside raw materials: natural resources alone could not develop a chemical process or design electrical equipment.
Banks helped mobilise capital for large investments, while major firms could use retained profits, joint-stock ownership and close financial relationships to expand. Scale was important where mines, furnaces or laboratories required large initial spending. A larger enterprise could spread fixed costs across more output, though this did not guarantee efficient management or prevent financial crises.
Explain growth through connected mechanisms: resources supplied production, capital financed investment, skills improved methods and transport widened markets. A list of favourable conditions needs these links to become an explanation.
The boom after unification was interrupted by the financial crash of 1873. Prices and profits in some sectors came under pressure, and contemporaries described prolonged depression. Nevertheless, output continued to expand over the longer period. Falling prices, uneven profitability and increasing production could coexist. The term depression must therefore be qualified by the measure and years being discussed.
Coal, steel and established industries
Coal mining, iron and steel, textiles and engineering were established industries whose scale grew within the new national economy. The Ruhr's proximity of coal, factories and transport encouraged industrial concentration. Firms such as Krupp combined engineering and steel production with military contracts. Armaments provided demand, but the industrial economy also served railways, construction, machinery and civilian consumption.
Technical change improved heavy industry. Processes that made steel cheaper or allowed previously difficult ores to be used expanded supply. Steel could replace iron in applications requiring greater strength, helping machinery, railways and ships develop. Older industrial sectors did not therefore remain technically static: calling them old distinguishes their origins from later industries, not an absence of innovation.
The scale of change is visible in GHDI's industrial output index, based on Rolf Wagenführ's statistical series: overall industrial production increased approximately fivefold between 1870 and 1914. An index summarises changes across selected branches using a reference year; it is not a count of tonnes of one product. Such aggregate growth does not establish how benefits were distributed among workers or regions and should not be mistaken for a per-person measure of welfare.
Competition and pressure on prices encouraged firms to coordinate through cartels, agreements over matters such as prices, output or markets. Larger combinations could reduce uncertainty and organise investment, especially in capital-intensive sectors. They could also reduce competition and strengthen employers' bargaining position. Economic concentration thus created questions about who possessed power within the growing economy.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account