2T - Brezhnev as leader: reasons for Khrushchev's removal from power and Brezhnev's ascendancy
Learn why senior colleagues removed Khrushchev, how Brezhnev consolidated leadership, and why the promise of stability strengthened the Soviet elite while encouraging patronage, ageing leadership and corruption.
Why Khrushchev was removed
Khrushchev was removed in October 1964 by colleagues who combined dissatisfaction with his policies and fear for their own positions. Agricultural setbacks, especially the poor 1963 harvest and grain imports, weakened his claim to practical competence. The Cuban Missile Crisis had preserved Cuba but exposed the risks of his personal diplomacy and appeared publicly as a Soviet retreat. The worsening split with China added to criticism of his international judgement.
For party officials, repeated reorganisation was especially threatening. The division of regional party bodies into industrial and agricultural branches in 1962 confused responsibilities and disrupted established networks. Rules encouraging turnover suggested that secure positions might disappear. Khrushchev's abrasive treatment of colleagues and tendency to push sudden campaigns made these policy objections personal as well as institutional.
Leonid Brezhnev, Alexei Kosygin, Nikolai Podgorny and other senior figures coordinated the challenge. Khrushchev was summoned back from holiday to face the Presidium and then the Central Committee. He lacked the support that had saved him in 1957 and agreed to retire. Official explanations emphasised his age and health; criticism within the leadership concerned voluntarism, policy failures and the concentration of power.
No single setback made removal inevitable. Poor performance supplied arguments, but a sufficiently organised elite coalition was needed to act. His opponents could do so more safely because de-Stalinisation had reduced the expectation that political defeat meant execution. Khrushchev's own reforms thus helped make his peaceful removal possible.
From collective rule to Brezhnev
The new leaders initially distributed authority. Brezhnev became First Secretary, Kosygin Chairman of the Council of Ministers, and Podgorny later held the formal head-of-state position as Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet. The arrangement distinguished party leadership, economic government and ceremonial state authority. Brezhnev's title changed to General Secretary in 1966, but a title alone does not explain his gradual predominance.
Brezhnev had risen through the party apparatus and owed earlier promotion to Khrushchev. He was an experienced organiser and broker of relationships rather than an advocate of constant innovation. He built support by promoting associates, recognising colleagues' interests and avoiding the disruption that had alienated them from his predecessor. Networks developed from earlier work in Ukraine and elsewhere helped supply trusted personnel.
Over time Brezhnev's control of appointments and the party machinery gave him an advantage over colleagues with narrower institutional bases. His growing role in foreign policy also enhanced his stature. Podgorny's removal in 1977 allowed Brezhnev to add the head-of-state office to party leadership. Nevertheless, he continued to depend on senior colleagues and powerful institutions. The defence ministry, KGB and economic bureaucracy were partners in rule rather than mere personal possessions.
This was consolidation through accommodation and patronage. Unlike Stalin, Brezhnev did not secure authority through repeated lethal purges of the elite. Unlike Khrushchev, he generally offered officials stability rather than a succession of reorganisations.
Views and associates
Brezhnev's priorities were political stability, Communist Party supremacy, Soviet great-power status and material improvement that would not threaten the system. He accepted limited changes when they appeared manageable, including Kosygin's economic reforms, but resisted reform that might weaken central control. The suppression of the Prague Spring in 1968 demonstrated the limits he placed on independent political change within the Soviet sphere.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account