2F - Louis XIV and Divine Right: personality and aims
Learn how Louis XIV combined a claim to God-given authority with administrative supervision, selective coercion and court patronage to strengthen royal government between 1661 and 1685.
Divine Right and royal duty
Louis XIV believed that kingship was a sacred office demanding obedience and active work. Divine Right held that royal authority came from God, rather than from a contract that subjects could cancel when dissatisfied. A king was accountable to God for the use of his power. The doctrine therefore justified a high claim to authority while also presenting government as a moral duty.
Absolutism
A claim that the monarch holds supreme governing authority and is not subject to a competing human sovereign within the kingdom. Its practical exercise could still depend on law, privilege, resources and cooperation.
The bishop and royal preacher Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet articulated sacred monarchy and the duty of obedience. Neither this doctrine nor Louis's conduct should be reduced to a licence to do absolutely anything. Bossuet's political treatise, prepared for the Dauphin and published posthumously in 1709, distinguishes absolute authority from arbitrary government and stresses royal responsibility. Fundamental rules of succession and the crown's enduring rights remained important, as did religion and expectations of justice. Practical obstacles also persisted: a royal command needed officials, money and local compliance. Bossuet's argument on royal authority.
Louis's aims combined order at home, dynastic security and gloire, the glory and reputation of the king and kingdom. He was concerned with status and ceremonial precedence, but also devoted substantial attention to government. His wish to command personally after Mazarin's death fits both the memory of the Frondes and a longer tradition of strengthening monarchy.
His memoirs intended for the Dauphin are useful for studying the principles he wished an heir to learn. They were prepared with literary assistance and under royal supervision, so they are a presentation of kingship, not a private diary offering unfiltered access to every motive. Versailles research catalogue of the memoirs and manuscripts.
Restoring and enforcing order
Louis's restoration of order built on the defeat of the Frondes rather than defeating the same rebellion again in 1661. Anne and Mazarin had restored royal government by 1653. Louis now sought to prevent powerful servants, magistrates or nobles from turning delegated authority into an independent challenge.
The arrest of Nicolas Fouquet, superintendent of finances, in September 1661 made that determination visible. Fouquet possessed wealth, clients and command of financial arrangements on which the crown relied. Colbert attacked his management and helped Louis investigate royal finance. The office of superintendent was abolished, and financial supervision was reorganised around the king and a council. Colbert became controller-general in 1665.
Fouquet's magnificent entertainment at Vaux-le-Vicomte in August 1661 made his fall memorable, but the explanation should not stop at a jealous king offended by one party. Investigation and political plans preceded the arrest. His case involved financial accountability and the danger of an influential ministerial network as well as royal self-assertion. The prosecution was also contested, showing why a royal accusation should not automatically be treated as a neutral verdict on the accused.
Louis used other measures to make order more regular. A lieutenant-general of police was established in Paris in 1667, with Gabriel Nicolas de La Reynie holding the position. The crown sought closer supervision of urban security, markets and public order. The civil ordinance of 1667 and criminal ordinance of 1670 attempted to regularise judicial procedures. These measures increased coordination; they did not replace all regional law with one complete national code.
The distinction is between spectacular coercion and routine administration. Fouquet's removal warned elite servants that the king would act against them. Police and legal reforms sought continuing compliance beyond a single dramatic example.
Centralising royal decisions
Louis strengthened central authority by controlling who participated in decisions and how their work reached him. After Mazarin's death he appointed no replacement chief minister. He retained ministers and worked with councils handling matters such as high policy, finance and provincial affairs. Personal rule meant that he coordinated government; it did not mean that he dispensed with administration.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account