2A - The character and aims of King Richard: attitudes towards religion and the Church
Richard I's reputation as a warrior grew from decisions that were both religious and political. Learn why he prioritised crusading, how he used the Church and England's resources, and why military achievement in the Third Crusade did not fulfil every aim.
A warrior king with several aims
Richard wanted to fulfil his crusading commitment while securing the inheritance he received in 1189.
Richard had experience of warfare before becoming king. As ruler in Aquitaine, he had fought to establish his authority over local opponents. His struggle against Henry II also showed a determination to protect his territorial position and succession. He brought military energy and political ambition to kingship, rather than acquiring them only when he went to the Holy Land.
His lands were not confined to England. He inherited claims and responsibilities in Normandy, Anjou, Aquitaine and other continental territories. England was a valuable kingdom within that inheritance, supplying revenue and administrative support. A ruler who concentrated on continental warfare could consider himself an active defender of his position even while spending little time in England. Absence should be judged through its consequences, rather than assumed to mean that he had no interest in royal authority.
The defeat of Christian forces at Hattin and Saladin's capture of Jerusalem in 1187 gave crusading exceptional urgency. Richard took the cross before becoming king. The commitment was an obligation of faith and honour, and offered prestige as a defender of Christianity. It also created a practical problem: he would be away from the lands on which his power depended, while rival rulers and potential successors could exploit his absence.
Crusading vow
A religious commitment to undertake an expedition sanctioned by the Church, normally symbolised by taking the cross. It bound an undertaking in war to spiritual promises and duties.
Richard's aims could reinforce or obstruct one another. Crusading glory could enhance his standing as king; the costs and absence could weaken security at home. His marriage to Berengaria of Navarre in 1191 also had dynastic and political significance, linking him to a neighbouring kingdom on Aquitaine's southern side. Personal relationships, territory and religion all shaped his decisions.
Richard was a capable commander, but that does not mean every decision was prudent or successful. Judging his character requires separating courage and leadership from diplomacy, financial choices and the effects of his priorities on subjects.
Religion and royal resources
Richard used ecclesiastical authority and personnel to support both Christian kingship and government.
His coronation in September 1189 placed royal authority within a religious ceremony and included obligations to uphold justice and protect the Church. He filled bishoprics and promoted experienced clerks. William Longchamp became bishop of Ely as well as chancellor; Hubert Walter became bishop of Salisbury and later archbishop of Canterbury. These appointments illustrate how Church offices and royal administration overlapped. A churchman could supervise a diocese and also raise money, negotiate or govern in the king's absence.
Richard's religious commitments also produced demands on the Church's resources. The Saladin Tithe of 1188, begun under Henry II, had raised money for crusading. Richard added revenue from grants, sales of rights and offices, and other financial arrangements. Northampton's charter of 1189 belongs to this setting: towns could acquire valuable privileges while the king secured resources. Such bargaining did not simply give money away; it exchanged immediate royal advantages for rights that could have lasting value to their holders.
Temporalities
The lands, revenues and associated worldly rights attached to an ecclesiastical office, distinguished from its spiritual functions.
The king could favour the Church as a religious institution while making heavy demands on its wealth. Bishops and abbots likewise had several obligations: spiritual leadership, protection of their communities and service to the monarch. Jocelin of Brakelond's account of Bury St Edmunds describes debates about crusading and the king's later captivity. It shows that churchmen could regard service to Richard as a serious duty while needing to preserve local government and monastic resources. The primary chronicle is available through Fordham's source collection.
Richard's conduct cannot be explained by choosing between sincere faith and political advantage. Medieval kingship treated religious legitimacy as part of power. Giving bishops administrative duties might serve royal needs without proving that the king thought their spiritual office unimportant. Conversely, a crusading vow does not establish that every financial demand or military act was just.
The route to Acre
Richard's journey to the Holy Land required him to solve political and supply problems before fighting Saladin.
Richard and Philip II of France set out on the Third Crusade in 1190. Their temporary common purpose did not remove their rivalry. Both needed sufficient forces, shipping, supplies and money for an expedition far from their own territories. Richard wintered in Sicily, where disputes involving his sister Joan and the new ruler Tancred contributed to conflict. Negotiation and military pressure secured resources and arrangements for continuing east.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account