2J - Southern resistance to abolitionism, c1845–1854
Southern reactions to abolitionism combined defence of property, fear of social disruption, political demands and persuasive writing. Learn how Jefferson Davis and proslavery publications defended slavery in c1845–1854, while Unionist disagreement continued inside the South.
Abolitionism as a threat to southern order
Abolitionism challenged the foundation of slaveholders' wealth and authority. Enslaved people represented coerced labour and valuable property under southern law; emancipation would remove ownership claims and alter production. Opposition to slavery also challenged the racial hierarchy through which white political leaders justified power. Defenders could therefore present abolition as a threat to the whole southern social order rather than a dispute affecting only plantation owners.
Fear helped widen that argument's appeal. Slaveholders remembered uprisings such as Nat Turner's rebellion in Virginia in 1831 and alleged that antislavery publications might encourage resistance. White people without enslaved property could be told that emancipation would threaten security, employment or racial status. Such warnings were political claims designed to mobilise support; they do not prove that abolition would have produced the disasters predicted.
Southern defences increasingly went beyond calling slavery an unfortunate necessity. Advocates described it as a positive good, claiming that enslavers provided care and stability lacking in northern wage labour. Paternalism portrayed masters as protectors and enslaved people as dependants. That claim obscured coercion, sale, punishment and the denial of freedom. Understanding the argument requires explaining why it appealed to defenders while testing it against evidence of the system's operation.
The response also constrained discussion. Restrictions on abolitionist material, hostility to antislavery speakers and social pressure against dissent made open criticism dangerous in many southern communities. Earlier suppression of abolitionist mail in the 1830s supplied a precedent for treating northern publication as outside interference. An apparently united public voice could consequently reflect the exclusion of dissent as well as shared belief.
Jefferson Davis and southern political demands
Jefferson Davis, a Mississippi planter and Democratic politician, connected the defence of slavery to constitutional rights and sectional equality. He entered the US Senate in 1847 and opposed concessions in the 1850 settlement that he considered inadequate protection for the South. He argued that slaveholders should not be excluded from territories acquired by the common efforts of the states. The territorial question therefore became a test of whether southern citizens possessed equal rights within the Union.
Davis's position should be understood within this period, rather than read backwards from his later Confederate presidency. In 1850 his defence of southern rights coexisted with an expressed attachment to the Union. He regarded allegiance to his state and constituents as a fundamental obligation, making national loyalty conditional on continued protection of those interests. This was a dangerous tension, but it did not mean that every southern leader was already committed to immediate secession.
Davis later served as Secretary of War under President Franklin Pierce from 1853. Holding national office shows that a forceful defender of slavery could continue to seek influence through federal institutions. Southern leaders wanted national protection for slave property and fugitives even while protesting federal measures they regarded as hostile. States' rights rhetoric and participation in federal power worked together when both served sectional interests.
The 1850 crisis also exposed disagreement within the South. The Nashville Convention brought southern representatives together, but advocates of immediate resistance did not unite all slave states behind disunion. Unionists accepted compromise as preferable to the costs and uncertainties of separation. Distinguish defence of slavery, which was widespread in white southern politics, from the timing and method of defending it, over which substantial disagreement remained.
Proslavery literature and newspapers
Southern writers answered abolitionist criticism by attacking northern society and idealising plantation relationships. The popularity of Uncle Tom's Cabin encouraged an anti-Tom literature that disputed Stowe's portrayal and offered supposedly benevolent masters and loyal dependants. Works such as Mary Henderson Eastman's Aunt Phillis's Cabin in 1852 used fiction to defend the slaveholding order. Their stories were interventions in a political controversy, not independent proof of plantation contentment.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account