2S - Realignment of the Labour Party under Kinnock, Smith and Blair
Learn how three leaders changed Labour's organisation, policies and appeal, and weigh those changes against Conservative weaknesses in explaining the 1997 victory.
Kinnock and the cost of defeat
Labour's defeats in 1979 and 1983 encouraged a debate about whether its programme and internal conflicts prevented it from reaching enough voters. Neil Kinnock, leader from 1983 to 1992, had to modernise a party whose activists, MPs, unions and voters did not all want the same change. The SDP split had already shown the cost of internal conflict, while changes in employment weakened reliance on a large industrial working-class electorate.
Kinnock challenged Militant, a revolutionary socialist organisation operating within Labour, particularly after the dispute over Liverpool council's finances. His 1985 conference attack on the council's conduct asserted that loyalty to ordinary workers did not justify tactics which endangered their jobs or services. Expulsions and tighter party control helped Labour present itself as a party capable of governing. The process also caused resentment among those who thought leaders were suppressing the left rather than addressing inequality.
The leadership improved campaigning and communications. Peter Mandelson's work helped develop a more professional presentation in the 1987 campaign. Better image alone was insufficient: Labour remained vulnerable on defence, taxation and economic management. The defeats of 1987 and 1992 pushed further policy revision. A party can become more electorally competitive without yet securing power; Kinnock's contribution is best judged by the groundwork he left as well as his two losses.
Policy change before Blair
Labour's policy review after 1987 reduced commitments which voters associated with the early 1980s. The party moved away from unilateral nuclear disarmament and towards acceptance of a mixed economy with a larger role for markets. It became more supportive of European cooperation, partly because European social protections appeared to offer workers safeguards which a Conservative government opposed.
These changes were a realignment: Labour tried to combine its commitment to social justice with policies which could reassure voters outside its traditional base. Accepting markets did not logically require accepting every Conservative policy. The question was increasingly how public action should regulate and redistribute within a market economy, rather than how extensively the state should replace private ownership.
The 1992 defeat showed the limits of the revised offer. Labour gained seats, but the Conservatives retained a majority. Conservative attacks on Labour's tax proposals reinforced fears among some voters about household finances. Major also offered a new personal style after Thatcher. Kinnock resigned, leaving a party less divided and more competitive than in 1983 but still unable to overcome doubts about governing competence.
Smith and party democracy
John Smith led Labour from 1992 until his sudden death in May 1994. He gave the party an image of seriousness and competence while criticising the government's handling of Black Wednesday. His approach was more gradual than Blair's later transformation. It relied partly on demonstrating that Conservative failures made a responsible Labour government preferable.
Smith's important organisational change was the introduction of one member, one vote in 1993. In leadership elections, voting remained within an electoral college, but union leaders could no longer cast large undifferentiated block votes. Affiliated members were individually balloted and the sections' shares were adjusted. Changes also gave individual members a larger role in selecting parliamentary candidates. This was not the abolition of Labour's union link or the introduction of a single equal vote across all sections of the leadership electorate.
The reform mattered beyond internal procedures. It reduced the credibility of Conservative claims that Labour leaders would be controlled by union bosses, and it gave modernisers a stronger basis for claiming a mandate from members. Smith also supported constitutional reform, including Scottish devolution. His short leadership prevents a confident conclusion that he would have followed Blair's exact path or achieved the same 1997 result. What can be established is that Labour's change was already well advanced before Blair became leader. Voting-system evidence.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account