2E - The monarchy restored: political vacuum after the death of Cromwell
The monarchy returned through political negotiation after republican institutions lost the ability to command consent. Trace the crisis of 1658–60, assess the assurances offered by Charles II, and distinguish restored institutions from the changes that the English Revolution left behind.
A crisis of authority after Cromwell
Oliver Cromwell's death in September 1658 removed the individual who had mediated between MPs, officers and competing religious groups. Richard's succession initially provided continuity, but disputes over army control and finance undermined it. In April 1659 military pressure forced him to dissolve Parliament; in May the Rump was restored, and Richard relinquished office.
The resulting political vacuum did not mean that courts, taxation and all local administration instantly stopped. It meant that no central arrangement could secure lasting recognition from those necessary to govern. The restored Rump claimed civilian authority, while the army regarded itself as the defender of the revolution and demanded protection for its position. These competing claims reproduced the problem that had undermined previous settlements.
Sir George Booth's rising in August 1659, centred on Cheshire, called for a free Parliament and attracted Royalists and others hostile to the existing government. Lambert defeated it, demonstrating that the army still possessed military power. Yet winning against rebels did not settle the quarrel with the Rump. In October the army again excluded Parliament and established a Committee of Safety. Opposition among commanders, civilians and parts of the army prevented this regime from gaining secure authority, and the Rump returned in December.
Changing governments could not remove the underlying disputes over representation, command and cost. The population faced continuing military demands and uncertainty while MPs and officers repeatedly displaced one another. Calls for a full or free Parliament gained force because an elected settlement seemed a route out of arbitrary interventions. Parliament's history of the Protectorate's end traces the succession of regimes.
Monck opens a route to settlement
George Monck commanded the army in Scotland and opposed the officers' displacement of civilian authority. He marched south, entering London in February 1660. His disciplined force gave him influence, but his importance also came from presenting himself as a defender of orderly parliamentary government rather than another commander claiming to rule directly.
Monck did not publicly declare a fixed plan to restore Charles at the beginning of his intervention. His actions progressively changed the balance of power. He secured the readmission of MPs excluded at Pride's Purge. These members strengthened conservative opinion and deprived the Rump of its claim to be the only surviving lawful Parliament. The reconstituted Long Parliament arranged elections and dissolved itself on 16 March 1660.
The new assembly met on 25 April. It is conventionally called the Convention Parliament, because it had assembled without royal summons, although contemporaries also called it a Parliament. Its Commons included men with a fresh electoral mandate, and the traditional Lords resumed sitting. The History of Parliament's study of the opening explains both the process and the later naming convention.
By this stage restoration was widely expected, but its terms still mattered. Civilian property holders wanted security, soldiers wanted pay and protection, and religious groups feared renewed penalties. Monck's control of force made negotiation credible; the Convention supplied a representative forum. Together they offered a means of restoring monarchy through agreement rather than another Royalist invasion.
The assurances of Breda
Charles II issued the Declaration of Breda on 4 April 1660, using the English calendar then in force. It offered a broad pardon, subject to exceptions Parliament would determine; religious liberty for peaceful consciences; parliamentary settlement of disputed property; and satisfaction of the army's arrears. These proposals addressed practical fears that could otherwise unite opponents against his return.
The promises were carefully framed. Parliament would decide exceptions to pardon and property disputes, and religious indulgence would require legislation. Charles did not promise that every republican purchaser would keep every estate or that every religious practice would receive permanent protection. Leaving disputed matters to Parliament let different groups hope for favourable outcomes without requiring him to settle them before he returned. The contemporary declaration makes these qualifications visible.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account