2B - The impact on English politics of the emerging power and influence of Richard of York
Learn how Richard of York became a major challenger to Henry VI’s councillors between 1450 and 1455. Examine the resources behind his influence, the limits of his support and the effect of the king’s incapacity on government.
York’s resources and claim
Richard of York mattered because he combined wealth, royal ancestry and experience of government. He held extensive estates in England and Wales and had served as the king’s lieutenant in France and Ireland. Land supplied income and an affinity of followers; office gave him knowledge of administration and connections. His marriage to Cecily Neville linked him to an important noble family, although kinship did not guarantee permanent political cooperation.
York also possessed a potential hereditary claim through his mother, Anne Mortimer, to Lionel, Duke of Clarence, an elder son of Edward III than John of Gaunt, from whom Henry VI descended. York had a further male-line descent from Edward III through Edmund of Langley. These genealogies made York a plausible dynastic alternative, but they did not settle the question automatically. The Lancastrians had ruled since 1399, Henry had been recognised as king since 1422, and subjects had sworn loyalty to him. Succession depended on accepted political authority as well as a pedigree.
Legitimacy
The recognised right to exercise authority. In fifteenth-century kingship, hereditary descent, established possession, religious sanction and political acceptance could all support a claim.
Before 1453 Henry had no child, making the succession uncertain. York’s ancestry heightened suspicion of his ambitions, but it is unsafe to treat all his actions in the early 1450s as steps in a settled plan to seize the crown. He publicly sought influence over Henry’s government and the removal of his opponents.
Opposition and Dartford
York returned from Ireland in 1450 as military defeats and Cade’s rising had discredited government. He attacked the role of Somerset and presented himself as a reformer of royal counsel. This appealed to dissatisfaction with the court, but the king’s preference for Somerset meant that criticism of an adviser could become a confrontation with Henry himself.
In 1452 York raised an armed following and sought Somerset’s removal. At Dartford, he failed to secure the backing needed to force the government to accept his demands. The king and a substantial body of nobles opposed him, and York submitted and reaffirmed his loyalty. His wealth and ancestry had not translated into a majority among the great lords. An armed challenge could frighten uncommitted nobles into supporting the reigning king rather than the challenger.
The episode therefore reveals both growing influence and a limit. York could mobilise men and make the quality of government a national issue, but he could not yet isolate Somerset or overcome the legitimacy of Henry’s position. His dependence on wider noble support explains why the later alliance with the Nevilles was so important. It also shows why political developments, rather than ancestry alone, changed the balance.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account