2E - The Political Nation 1640: the recall of Parliament
Understand why Charles recalled Parliament twice in 1640, how that altered the balance of power, and why opposition to Personal Rule did not mean agreement about England's future government. The crisis reveals how a ruler could retain legal authority while losing the cooperation needed to use it.
The Political Nation and the recall of Parliament
The crisis of 1640 brought together a war Charles could not finance and grievances he could no longer keep outside Parliament.
Political Nation
The people with a recognised role in political decisions, especially the monarch, peers, MPs and the property-owning local elites who elected MPs or administered government. It did not include everyone affected by politics.
England had no modern national party system or permanent elected legislature. The king summoned Parliament, which consisted of Lords and Commons, when he wanted legislation or taxation. Local gentlemen served as justices, sheriffs and militia leaders. Royal government therefore depended on cooperation from people who also defended their local status, property and interpretation of the law. Many disliked ship money or Laudian religious changes while remaining committed to monarchy.
The Scottish Covenanters' resistance had made military expenditure unavoidable. Charles summoned the Short Parliament in April 1640 to obtain subsidies for another campaign. John Pym and other MPs insisted that financial, religious and constitutional grievances should be addressed. Charles wanted supply first and dissolved Parliament on 5 May. The failure showed that recalling MPs did not automatically produce money: they could use his necessity to demand concessions.
Charles then attempted to fight without parliamentary supply. The defeat at Newburn in August allowed the Scots to occupy Newcastle and parts of northern England. Under the Treaty of Ripon, Charles had to finance the occupying Scottish army while negotiations continued. His own army also needed pay. Extraordinary revenue and credit could not meet these demands reliably. Advice from peers and pressure from critics reinforced the practical need to summon the Long Parliament, which opened on 3 November 1640. Scottish intervention had turned opposition into bargaining power.
Charles's remaining authority and new constraints
Charles entered the Long Parliament with serious weaknesses but remained an essential part of lawful government.
His defeat damaged confidence in his judgement. Revenue depended on reluctant taxpayers and creditors; the military crisis exposed the limits of Personal Rule. His ministers, especially Strafford and Laud, gave opponents identifiable targets. Suspicion that religious innovation threatened Protestantism made a financial settlement harder, since critics feared that extra money would restore the policies they opposed. Charles also found criticism personally difficult and resisted concessions that appeared to reduce his God-given authority.
Yet MPs had not summoned themselves to overthrow him. The king retained prestige, patronage, the formal right to appoint ministers and the royal assent needed for statutes. Most of the Political Nation regarded hereditary monarchy as the foundation of order. Peers could restrain the Commons, and local elites feared social disorder as well as arbitrary rule. Charles could hope to divide critics who agreed about past grievances but disagreed about the future Church. These strengths explain why Parliament initially attacked ministers and institutions rather than abolished kingship.
Distinguish a legal power from the ability to use it safely. Charles had dissolved the Short Parliament legally, but that action worsened his practical position. Likewise, refusing a concession might defend his principle of authority while increasing mistrust. His choices mattered because none of his remaining powers could by itself produce an obedient, financed army.
A strong opposition with different aims
Parliamentary opposition was strongest when it demanded remedies for Personal Rule and weaker when it had to define a replacement settlement.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account