2B - Change and continuity in English society during a decade of peace: trade and the economy, social mobility, the regions
Assess how peace after 1471 affected trade, opportunity and life in the regions. A more stable monarchy could support recovery, but economic fortunes and social advancement remained uneven and depended on forces beyond Edward IV's decisions.
Peace and commercial security
Peace after 1471 reduced the risk of repeated changes of ruler and major internal campaigns. This mattered to merchants who needed contracts upheld, roads and ports usable, and credit arrangements reasonably predictable. London was important as a commercial centre, source of loans and political ally. Edward's relations with merchants connected the king's financial needs to their interest in security, without making their interests identical in every dispute.
Foreign agreements also mattered. Peace with the Hanseatic League at Utrecht in 1474 ended a damaging conflict over maritime trade and commercial privileges. The settlement restored significant Hanseatic privileges in England, so greater predictability came at a cost to English merchants who wanted to challenge those advantages. The treaty was a compromise, not an unqualified English commercial victory. The British Library's contemporary diplomatic collection records the negotiations, drafts and instructions connected with Utrecht.
Picquigny in 1475 ended Edward's French expedition with payments and a truce rather than a prolonged war. It reduced the immediate demands of warfare and helped the Crown's finances. Commercial connections with the Low Countries remained important for wool and cloth, even though the death of Charles the Bold in 1477 altered Burgundy's political position. A domestic peace did not remove the possibility that events overseas could disrupt markets or alliances.
Thus the contribution of peace can be explained causally: less military disruption and more predictable authority made exchange and investment easier. It should not be converted into a claim that every export rose continuously or every town prospered. Diplomatic concessions, market demand and regional specialisation still produced winners and losers.
Economic change and continuity
England remained predominantly an agricultural society, and a decade without major civil battles did not reverse the demographic consequences of plague. A relatively small population meant different pressures from those of the thirteenth century: landlords could struggle to secure tenants and labour, while some workers and farmers had greater bargaining power. Landowners might lease estates, change the balance between cultivation and pasture, or seek income from more commercially attractive activities.
The cloth industry offered opportunities alongside agriculture. English producers converted wool into finished cloth for home and overseas markets, so economic value was not confined to exporting raw wool. Cloth making involved several occupations and could develop in rural districts as well as towns. Trade connected English regions to foreign demand; problems in the Low Countries or at sea could therefore affect an inland producer.
These developments had begun before 1471. Peace could assist them, but did not create the labour market or the cloth industry. Nor was change uniformly beneficial. A thriving producer, merchant or tenant might gain while a landlord with falling rental income or a worker in a troubled market faced difficulty. A national narrative of recovery needs to allow for local variation.
Evidence of continuing disease also qualifies a simple prosperity story. The Paston correspondence records the family's concern about sickness and movements to avoid it. Such letters show that personal insecurity continued during political peace. They cannot supply a national mortality rate, but they demonstrate why the absence of civil battle is an incomplete measure of well-being.
The distinction is between conditions and outcomes. Edward could provide more secure political conditions; harvests, disease, demand, prices and monetary availability helped determine the outcomes. Political stability was economically valuable without being the sole cause of economic change.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account