2L - The post-war economic crisis and social unrest: unemployment and inflation
The end of the war released demands for jobs, land and political influence that Liberal Italy struggled to reconcile. Economic hardship mattered, but its political consequences depended on the different programmes and organisations of the Socialists, Popolari and Fascists.
Economic crisis and unequal hardship
Peace required Italy to change an economy built around wartime production while millions of soldiers returned to civilian life. Factories that had expanded to supply weapons and military equipment could lose government orders before securing civilian customers. Reconversion meant redirecting production towards peacetime demand; it could involve new machinery, investment and reductions in employment. Firms dependent on wartime borrowing also endangered the banks that had financed them. The failure of the Banca Italiana di Sconto in 1921 demonstrated that the problem reached the financial system as well as individual workplaces.
Demobilised soldiers added to competition for jobs. A returning veteran might discover that his pre-war employment had disappeared, that an employer could not absorb all former workers, or that his family still had inadequate land. Wartime service did not guarantee a secure civilian future. Women who had entered wartime jobs could face pressure to leave them for returning men. These experiences encouraged resentment, although veterans did not all adopt the same politics: some joined socialist or Catholic organisations, some supported Fascism, and others avoided political activity.
Inflation and real income
Inflation is a rise in the general price level. Real income is what an income can buy: if prices rise faster than a person's wages or pension, that person's purchasing power falls.
Inflation continued the strain created by wartime debt, monetary expansion and shortages. Import dependence and the depreciation of the lira made essential supplies harder to afford. Families could receive more lire while struggling to buy food, clothing or fuel. The consequences were unequal. Organised workers sometimes secured wage increases through bargaining and strikes; people dependent on fixed salaries, pensions or savings had less protection. A salaried clerk's fear of declining status therefore differed from an unemployed labourer's immediate struggle to find work, even when both blamed the government.
Economic conditions also changed over time. Post-war disruption, inflation and the industrial downturn of 1920–1921 should not be treated as one uninterrupted process affecting everyone identically. Some workers improved their wages during the period of strong union activity, while others lost employment. Government faced a difficult combination: public debt limited resources, consumers wanted lower prices, workers wanted security and employers wanted relief from costs. The political danger arose when these competing demands seemed to have no credible parliamentary solution.
Mass elections and unstable governments
The post-war electorate and electoral system made the old methods of liberal parliamentary management harder to sustain. The 1918 franchise reform removed the remaining literacy and service restrictions on adult male voting; women were still excluded. In 1919 proportional representation replaced the earlier system of individual constituencies with voting in larger constituencies that gave organised party lists a stronger role. It aimed to translate votes more proportionately into seats, allowing national movements to challenge local liberal notables.
In the November 1919 election the PSI won 156 seats and the Popolari 100. Neither possessed a majority, but together their strength ended the liberals' previous parliamentary dominance. A government now needed cooperation among groups with sharply different identities and programmes. The Socialists' refusal to join a liberal coalition removed one large potential partner; Catholic and secular liberals disagreed over education and Church interests. Liberal leaders themselves competed for office rather than acting as a single disciplined party.
| Prime minister | Period in office | Central difficulty |
|---|---|---|
| Francesco Nitti | June 1919–June 1920 | Peace disputes, economic strain and the enlarged mass-party Parliament |
| Giovanni Giolitti | June 1920–July 1921 | Labour conflict and an unsuccessful attempt to stabilise politics through compromise and electoral alliances |
| Ivanoe Bonomi | July 1921–February 1922 | A fragile coalition and growing political violence |
| Luigi Facta | February–October 1922 | Parliamentary divisions and the escalating Fascist challenge to state authority |
Cabinet turnover mattered because it made sustained policy harder and encouraged the impression that liberal leaders only rearranged offices. Nevertheless, proportional representation did not mechanically cause dictatorship: it expressed political divisions already present in society, and coalition government was possible. Explain instability through the parties' decisions, ideological hostility and liberal fragmentation as well as the voting system. A change of prime minister alone did not abolish Parliament; the greater danger was that groups with influence began to doubt that Parliament could produce effective government.
The PSI: strength and division
The Italian Socialist Party emerged from the war with greater electoral strength and a powerful network of labour organisations. Its opposition to the war helped it appeal to workers who associated sacrifice, shortages and profits for contractors with the liberal state. Unions, agricultural leagues, cooperatives, newspapers and local councils gave socialism a presence in everyday life. Membership of these organisations could help secure wages, employment or affordable goods, rather than merely expressing an abstract revolutionary belief.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account