2L - Mussolini the statesman: relations with Britain and France
Learn why Mussolini cooperated with Britain and France, opposed German expansion into Austria, and helped form the Stresa Front before those relationships deteriorated.
Britain, France and Italian status
Mussolini’s early relations with Britain and France combined cooperation, bargaining and rivalry. Their democracies conflicted with Fascist ideology, but he needed their recognition of Italy as a great power. They in turn saw advantages in including Italy in agreements that preserved European stability. Ideological difference did not make hostility inevitable.
Italy had participated in the Locarno agreements of 1925 as a guarantor of the settlement on Germany’s western borders. Its signature of the Kellogg–Briand Pact in 1928, renouncing war as an instrument of national policy, reinforced the public image of a responsible statesman. Participation offered international status and an opportunity to influence negotiations; it did not prove that Mussolini had relinquished colonial expansion or all revision of the peace settlement.
Relations with Britain were often easier than those with France. British leaders could regard Mussolini as a source of order and a useful counterweight to other threats. France and Italy competed over the Mediterranean, Tunisia and influence in the Balkans. Italy’s claims and French shelter for anti-Fascist exiles added friction. Nevertheless, Hitler’s growing strength gave France a reason to seek Italian cooperation. The important question is which interest predominated at a particular moment.
Diplomatic bargaining
Negotiation in which states offer cooperation or concessions to secure other objectives. An agreement on one issue need not mean agreement on every issue.
Mussolini promoted a Four-Power Pact in 1933 involving Italy, Britain, France and Germany. Its limited practical results mattered less for his public image than the appearance that Italy helped manage Europe. This distinction is crucial: being invited to conferences was a real form of recognition, but the image of a decisive peacemaker could exceed Italy’s power to enforce a settlement. Smaller states also had reasons to distrust arrangements in which great powers appeared to decide their futures.
Austria as a buffer and sphere of influence
An independent Austria kept Germany away from Italy’s northern frontier and provided a state in which Italy could exercise influence. Anschluss, the union of Austria with Germany, would instead place a much stronger German power directly across the Brenner frontier. It could also encourage concerns about South Tyrol, a region Italy had acquired after the First World War with a substantial German-speaking population.
Mussolini supported Austrian Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss. That support was not a defence of parliamentary democracy: Dollfuss was constructing an authoritarian state and suppressing political opponents. Italy favoured an Austrian government that could resist Nazis while cooperating with Rome. The Rome Protocols of March 1934 joined Italy, Austria and Hungary in political and economic cooperation, giving Mussolini a framework for influence in Central Europe.
In July 1934 Austrian Nazis attempted a coup and assassinated Dollfuss. Mussolini mobilised Italian forces near the Austrian frontier, signalling that German intervention would risk an Italian response. The coup failed, and Hitler distanced himself from it. The mobilisation helped deter outside intervention, but it was not the only reason for failure: Austrian loyalist forces resisted and the putsch did not establish national control. FRUS’s contemporary report of the Austrian crisis records Italian frontier preparations alongside events inside Austria.
The crisis made Mussolini appear an effective opponent of Nazi expansion. It also exposed the limit of relying on Italy alone: defending Austria over time required a wider balance against Germany. Britain and France had an interest in Austrian independence, but different levels of willingness to incur military obligations. Italy’s preference for an Austrian buffer was therefore strategic, even though common authoritarian attitudes helped its relationship with Dollfuss.
The Laval agreements and competing objectives
French Foreign Minister Pierre Laval met Mussolini in Rome in January 1935. The resulting agreements addressed colonial and other disputes and made Franco-Italian cooperation more plausible. France sought Italy’s support against Germany; Mussolini hoped that concessions and understandings would improve Italy’s position in Africa.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account