2B - The renewal of war: York’s flight into exile
Learn how the Yorkists moved from defeat and exile in 1459 to control of Henry VI in 1460. Explain Warwick’s growing influence and why secure bases, political support and shifting loyalties mattered as much as battlefield success.
Blore Heath and Ludford
Renewed mobilisation in 1459 reflected the failure of reconciliation after St Albans. The court sought to contain York and the Nevilles; the Yorkists gathered their forces rather than trust their opponents with their security. Salisbury’s march to join York was intercepted by a royal force under Lord Audley at Blore Heath on 23 September 1459. Salisbury won, allowing his force to continue. The victory did not decide the campaign because the king’s larger coalition remained intact.
The opposing forces then confronted each other near Ludlow at Ludford Bridge in October 1459. Henry’s presence gave the royal army an advantage beyond numbers: men who had served the king could find fighting him directly harder to justify than attacking his councillors. Andrew Trollope and men from the Calais garrison who had accompanied Warwick deserted to the king. The loss weakened the Yorkist force and its confidence.
York and the leading Nevilles abandoned their army and fled. York went to Ireland, while Warwick, Salisbury and York’s eldest son Edward, Earl of March, reached Calais. Their defeat was therefore a collapse of a coalition before a sustained battle, rather than proof that Salisbury’s earlier military skill had suddenly vanished. It demonstrated the practical strength of royal legitimacy and the fragility of a following asked to take up arms against the king.
Exile and attainder
The Coventry Parliament of November 1459 punished the Yorkist leaders by attainder. It declared them traitors and allowed the Crown to confiscate their lands and deny their heirs the normal inheritance. This was a political use of Parliament against opponents who were not present to defend themselves. The later label Parliament of Devils reflects hostile judgement of that assembly, rather than a neutral official name.
Attainder
A legal condemnation, often by parliamentary act, that could remove a person’s rights and forfeit property for treason. It could also prevent heirs inheriting through the condemned person.
Attainder gave the court lands and rewards to distribute and appeared to destroy its opponents’ standing. But it also made a lasting compromise harder. The exiles now had strong reasons to return: without reversal, they and their families risked permanent exclusion. Confiscating property could punish enemies without physically removing their leadership or the resources they retained outside England.
York had built connections during his service in Ireland, where local support allowed him to resist the English government’s attempts to displace him. At Calais, Warwick maintained control despite the court’s effort to install Somerset as captain. The garrison and port provided shelter, trained men and the ability to cross the Channel. Exile weakened the Yorkists in England, but it left them with two defensible bases from which the consequences of defeat could be challenged.
Warwick’s growing influence
Warwick emerged as the central organiser of the Yorkist recovery because his resources survived the flight from Ludford. Calais was especially valuable after the loss of royal office and English estates. His maritime activity created a public image of vigorous defence of English interests and connected him to sailors and commercial communities. That reputation should not make every seizure at sea an act of national service: some operations drew complaints and had been part of his dispute with the court.
During exile Warwick coordinated supporters, resisted Somerset at Calais and maintained contact with York in Ireland. In June 1460 he returned to England with Salisbury and Edward, Earl of March. Support in Kent helped the invasion reach London. Yorkist declarations emphasised loyalty to Henry and promised reform of bad government. That approach made it possible for people dissatisfied with the court to support the invaders without immediately accepting the deposition of the king.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account