1L - The political, economic and social condition of reunified Germany by 1991: Kohl and the drive to reunification
Learn how popular action, international change and Kohl’s decisions brought reunification, then judge Germany’s condition by 1991 through political strength, economic adjustment and the different experiences of eastern and western Germans.
The opening for unity
Reunification became possible because several obstacles weakened together in 1989. Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev’s reforms and changing approach to eastern Europe reduced the expectation that Moscow would use force to preserve every communist government. Hungary’s opening of its border with Austria created an escape route for East Germans. Emigration exposed the GDR’s loss of legitimacy, while peaceful demonstrations, notably the Monday protests in Leipzig, demanded change from within.
The SED leadership could no longer rely on ordinary repression or an assured Soviet intervention to restore authority. Erich Honecker was replaced in October 1989, but personnel change did not solve the crisis. On 9 November, a confused announcement of new travel rules brought crowds to border crossings; guards opened them. The fall of the Berlin Wall was a decisive breach in division, but it did not itself settle which institutions, currency or international alliances a united Germany would have.
East German protesters and migrants were actors in this process, not spectators awaiting a western leader. Some initially sought democratic reform of the GDR; others increasingly wanted unity and access to western prosperity. These different aims explain why ending SED dictatorship and reunifying Germany should be distinguished, even though events soon connected them.
Helmut Kohl used the opening to promote unity. His ten-point programme of 28 November 1989 envisaged stages towards closer cooperation and eventual unity within a European framework. The Bundestag’s record of the programme shows a proposal made after the crisis had opened the opportunity. Kohl was important in directing its outcome; attributing the Wall’s collapse to him alone would reverse the sequence of cause and response.
Kohl and the route to reunification
Kohl favoured rapid movement towards unity once events made it feasible. Continuing migration put pressure on both states and raised the risk that an extended transition would further weaken the eastern economy. The first free GDR election on 18 March 1990 gave strong support to the CDU-led Alliance for Germany and its commitment to rapid unity. Lothar de Maizière’s government thus had an electoral mandate for negotiation. Western resources mattered, but the decision cannot be described simply as an unelected annexation imposed on eastern citizens.
The monetary, economic and social union began on 1 July 1990. The Deutsche Mark replaced the eastern currency, and the GDR adopted central features of the western economic and social system. This gave access to a trusted currency and helped make unity tangible. The Bundesbank’s history of monetary union confirms that it preceded formal political reunification. Economic union and political union are related stages, not the same date.
The Unification Treaty provided the domestic legal framework. On 3 October 1990 the GDR acceded to the Federal Republic using the then Article 23 of the Basic Law, with five eastern Länder restored and Berlin united. The FRG’s institutions and constitution continued across the enlarged state. This produced continuity and administrative clarity; it also meant that eastern citizens largely adapted to an existing western system rather than jointly founding an entirely new one.
Kohl’s skill lay partly in connecting speed with legal and diplomatic agreements. Strong popular desire for improvement, the western state’s resources and the collapse of SED authority made that strategy feasible. He did not control all consequences: a rapid timetable could achieve political union before the economies or social experiences converged.
International agreement and political strength
German unity required international agreement because the four victorious powers retained rights over Germany as a whole and Berlin. The Two Plus Four negotiations brought the two German states together with the United States, Soviet Union, Britain and France. Neighbours’ concerns involved borders, security and the position of a larger Germany in Europe.
The final settlement treaty was signed on 12 September 1990. It addressed Germany’s final borders and security arrangements, including limits on its armed forces and provisions concerning the former GDR territory. Germany remained in NATO. Recognition of the Polish border and commitment to European cooperation helped reassure neighbours. The Foreign Office’s official treaty and status records make the settlement distinct from the domestic Unification Treaty. Four-power rights were suspended at unification; the final settlement entered into force on 15 March 1991 and formally ended them.
Continue this lesson.
You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.
Create free account