N2 - Written methods for the four operations

N2 - Written methods for the four operations

Written methods turn a large calculation into small steps you can trust. You will add, subtract, multiply and divide integers and decimals, handle negative numbers, and use these skills for money and account balances. The methods work on both tiers, including Paper 1, where you cannot use a calculator.

Adding in columns

A school stall takes £186.75 and spends £128.90 on supplies. It starts with an account balance of −£24.60-£24.60. Is the account above zero afterwards, and by how much? Keep the three amounts separate for now: first we need reliable ways to combine them.

You already know

Line up decimal points to put ones under ones, tenths under tenths and hundredths under hundredths. Adding a zero at the end of a decimal changes its appearance but not its value: 3.7=3.703.7 = 3.70.

Imagine adding 2727 and 1818. The ones give 7+8=157 + 8 = 15: write 55 ones and exchange the other 1010 ones for 11 ten. The tens then give 2+1+1=42 + 1 + 1 = 4. This exchange, often called carrying, is why column addition works. You never throw away a digit; you express its value in the next column.

Start at the right. When a column total reaches 1010, exchange 1010 of that unit for 11 of the next unit. This applies to tenths and hundredths too. Column addition is not on the formulae sheet: learn the method.

Worked example 1: carrying with whole numbers

Question. Work out 458+376458 + 376. Non-calculator.

Plan. Add from the ones column, carrying into the next column where needed.

458+ 3768348+6=14write 4, carry 15+7+1=13write 3, carry 14+3+1=8hundreds\begin{array}{r} 458\\ +\ 376\\ \hline 834 \end{array} \qquad \begin{aligned} 8 + 6 &= 14 && \text{write 4, carry 1}\\ 5 + 7 + 1 &= 13 && \text{write 3, carry 1}\\ 4 + 3 + 1 &= 8 && \text{hundreds} \end{aligned}

Why carry? 1414 ones are 11 ten and 44 ones, so the carried digit has a different column value.

Answer. 834834.

Check. 834−376=458834 - 376 = 458; subtraction returns the starting amount.

The next example changes only the type of numbers: they are decimals. The same exchanges work, but the decimal points must line up first.

Worked example 2: unequal decimal lengths

Question. Work out 18.76+4.818.76 + 4.8. Non-calculator.

Plan. Write 4.84.8 as 4.804.80, then add matching columns.

18.76+ 4.8023.566+0=6hundredths7+8=15write 5 tenths, carry 18+4+1=13write 3 ones, carry 11+1=2tens\begin{array}{r} 18.76\\ +\ 4.80\\ \hline 23.56 \end{array} \qquad \begin{aligned} 6 + 0 &= 6 && \text{hundredths}\\ 7 + 8 &= 15 && \text{write 5 tenths, carry 1}\\ 8 + 4 + 1 &= 13 && \text{write 3 ones, carry 1}\\ 1 + 1 &= 2 && \text{tens} \end{aligned}

Why add the zero? It makes the hundredths column visible without changing 4.84.8.

Answer. 23.5623.56.

Check. 18+4<23.56<19+518 + 4 < 23.56 < 19 + 5, so the answer is in the right range.

Column layout is part of the reasoning, not just tidy presentation.

Watch out

Wrong: placing the 8 of 4.84.8 under the 6 of 18.7618.76. That adds tenths to hundredths. Right: line up the decimal points, giving 18.76+4.80=23.5618.76 + 4.80 = 23.56.

Try the same layout with different numbers. Check the carry from the tenths column carefully.

Subtracting with exchanges

Subtraction finds what is left, or the gap between two amounts. In a column calculation, exchange when the top digit is too small for the subtraction in that column.

For 52−2752 - 27, write 5252 as 44 tens and 1212 ones. You can now subtract 77 ones, leaving 55, and 22 tens, leaving 22. The answer is 2525. The value 5252 has stayed fixed throughout: only its grouping changed.

Zeros need care. To exchange across a zero, first exchange from a non-zero column to its left, then pass the value along. Written subtraction is not on the formulae sheet: learn the method.

Worked example 3: exchanging across zero

Question. Work out 2004−7582004 - 758. Non-calculator.

Plan. Exchange one thousand through the hundreds and tens until the ones column can be subtracted.

2004=1 thousand+9 hundreds+9 tens+14 onesexchange, value unchanged14−8=6ones9−5=4tens9−7=2hundreds1−0=1thousands2004− 7581246\begin{aligned} 2004 &= 1\text{ thousand}+9\text{ hundreds}+9\text{ tens}+14\text{ ones} && \text{exchange, value unchanged}\\ 14 - 8 &= 6 && \text{ones}\\ 9 - 5 &= 4 && \text{tens}\\ 9 - 7 &= 2 && \text{hundreds}\\ 1 - 0 &= 1 && \text{thousands} \end{aligned} \qquad \begin{array}{r} 2004\\ -\ 758\\ \hline 1246 \end{array}

Why do both zero columns become 9? Each receives 1010 units from its left, then gives 11 of its own units to the right.

Answer. 12461246.

Check. 1246+758=20041246 + 758 = 2004.

The next example changes only the scale: the numbers are decimal amounts. The exchanges still move between neighbouring columns.

Worked example 4: subtracting a decimal

Question. Work out 20.04−7.5820.04 - 7.58. Non-calculator.

Plan. Align the decimal points and exchange across the zero columns.

20.04=1 ten+9 ones+9 tenths+14 hundredthssame total value14−8=6hundredths9−5=4tenths9−7=2ones1−0=1tens20.04− 7.5812.46\begin{aligned} 20.04 &= 1\text{ ten}+9\text{ ones}+9\text{ tenths}+14\text{ hundredths} && \text{same total value}\\ 14 - 8 &= 6 && \text{hundredths}\\ 9 - 5 &= 4 && \text{tenths}\\ 9 - 7 &= 2 && \text{ones}\\ 1 - 0 &= 1 && \text{tens} \end{aligned} \qquad \begin{array}{r} 20.04\\ -\ 7.58\\ \hline 12.46 \end{array}

Why keep the decimal point in the answer? Each answer digit still belongs to the column in which you found it.

Answer. 12.4612.46.

Check. 12.46+7.58=20.0412.46 + 7.58 = 20.04.

You must subtract each bottom value from the top value, even when an exchange is needed.

Watch out

Wrong: 52−27=3552 - 27 = 35, from subtracting the smaller digit from the larger digit in each column. Right: exchange 52=40+1252 = 40 + 12, giving 52−27=2552 - 27 = 25. Swapping individual digits changes the question.

If a question asks you to show working, keep the column calculation visible. It can earn a method mark even if one subtraction goes wrong.

Multiplying integers and decimals

Long multiplication splits one factor into its place-value parts. For example, multiplying by 2424 means multiplying by 44, multiplying by 2020, then adding those two products.

The 2020 row must be ten times the 22 row. That is the reason for its final zero. For decimals, first multiply the whole-number digits, then scale the product back using place value. If both factors have been multiplied by 1010, the temporary product is 100100 times too large. This method is not on the formulae sheet: learn it.

Worked example 5: two partial products

Question. Work out 236×24236 \times 24. Non-calculator.

Plan. Multiply by 44 and by 2020, then add the rows.

236× 2494447205664236×4=944ones row236×20=4720tens row944+4720=5664combine the products\begin{array}{r} 236\\ \times\ 24\\ \hline 944\\ 4720\\ \hline 5664 \end{array} \qquad \begin{aligned} 236 \times 4 &= 944 && \text{ones row}\\ 236 \times 20 &= 4720 && \text{tens row}\\ 944 + 4720 &= 5664 && \text{combine the products} \end{aligned}

Why is the second row 47204720? Its multiplier is 2020, not 22; 236×2=472236 \times 2 = 472 must be made ten times larger.

Answer. 56645664.

Check. Splitting 236236 instead gives 200(24)+30(24)+6(24)=4800+720+144=5664200(24)+30(24)+6(24)=4800+720+144=5664.

The next example changes only the place-value scale of those factors. The whole-number multiplication is already done; now decide how much smaller the answer must be.

Worked example 6: putting the decimal point back

Question. Work out 2.36×2.42.36 \times 2.4. Non-calculator.

Plan. Use 236×24236 \times 24, then undo the two scale changes.

2.36=236÷100first factor scaled down2.4=24÷10second factor scaled down2.36×2.4=5664÷1000product scaled down both times=5.664\begin{aligned} 2.36 &= 236 \div 100 && \text{first factor scaled down}\\ 2.4 &= 24 \div 10 && \text{second factor scaled down}\\ 2.36 \times 2.4 &= 5664 \div 1000 && \text{product scaled down both times}\\ &= 5.664 \end{aligned}

Why divide by 10001000? The first factor is 100100 times smaller and the second is 1010 times smaller, so the product is 10001000 times smaller.

Answer. 5.6645.664.

Check. 2.36×2=4.722.36 \times 2 = 4.72 and 2.36×3=7.082.36 \times 3 = 7.08. The answer lies between these.

Counting the decimal places gives the same result: two in 2.362.36 and one in 2.42.4, making three in 5.6645.664. Use this as a multiplication shortcut, with a size check.

Watch out

Wrong: 236×24=944+472236 \times 24 = 944 + 472. The second row has lost its tens value. Right: 944+4720=5664944 + 4720 = 5664. A missing zero changes the answer, even when every small multiplication is correct.

Here only the first factor changes from Worked example 6. Keep the same scale reasoning.

Dividing integers and decimals

Division asks how many equal groups fit, or how much belongs in each equal share. Written division handles one place-value column at a time.

For 936÷6936 \div 6, 99 hundreds shared into 66 groups gives 11 hundred each and 33 hundreds left. Exchange the remainder for 3030 tens, combine it with the next 33 tens, then continue. Each remainder must be smaller than the divisor.

You may add zeros after a decimal point to keep dividing. For example, a remainder of 33 ones becomes 3030 tenths. With a decimal divisor, first multiply both numbers by the same power of ten to make the divisor whole. These written-division methods are not on the formulae sheet: learn them.

Worked example 7: long division by a two-digit number

Question. Work out 1488÷241488 \div 24. Non-calculator.

Plan. Find how many groups of 2424 fit into 148148, subtract, then bring down the last digit.

622414881440‾048048‾000148÷24:6 remainder 46 belongs in the tens48÷24=2bring down the 81488÷24=62no remainder\begin{array}{r|r} &62\\[-2pt] 24&1488\\ &\underline{144\phantom{0}}\\ &\phantom{0}48\\ &\phantom{0}\underline{48}\\ &\phantom{00}0 \end{array} \qquad \begin{aligned} 148 \div 24 &: 6\text{ remainder }4 && \text{6 belongs in the tens}\\ 48 \div 24 &= 2 && \text{bring down the 8}\\ 1488 \div 24 &= 62 && \text{no remainder} \end{aligned}

Why is the first quotient digit worth 6060? The 148148 being divided represents 148148 tens before the last ones digit is brought down.

Answer. 6262.

Check. 24×62=1440+48=148824 \times 62 = 1440 + 48 = 1488.

The next example changes only the scale of the same division. Make the divisor whole before starting, then use the unchanged whole-number quotient.

Worked example 8: making a decimal divisor whole

Question. Work out 14.88÷2.414.88 \div 2.4. Non-calculator.

Plan. Multiply both numbers by 1010, then use the previous long division with a decimal quotient.

14.88÷2.4=148.8÷24both numbers multiplied by 10148.8÷24=6.2one tenth of 1488÷24\begin{aligned} 14.88 \div 2.4 &= 148.8 \div 24 && \text{both numbers multiplied by 10}\\ 148.8 \div 24 &= 6.2 && \text{one tenth of }1488\div24 \end{aligned}

In written division, 2424 goes into 148148 six times, leaving 44 ones; those become 4040 tenths. Bringing down 88 tenths gives 4848 tenths, so the next digit is 22 tenths.

Why scale both numbers? The number of groups is unchanged when both the total and the size of each group are made ten times larger.

Answer. 6.26.2.

Check. 6.2×2.4=14.886.2 \times 2.4 = 14.88.

A zero in the quotient can matter as much as any other digit. For 816÷8816 \div 8, write 11 hundred, 00 tens and 22 ones: 102102, not 1212. To continue into decimals, 7÷47 \div 4 gives 11 remainder 33, then 30÷430 \div 4 gives 77 tenths remainder 22, then 20÷420 \div 4 gives 55 hundredths. Thus 7÷4=1.757 \div 4 = 1.75.

Watch out

Wrong: 14.88÷2.4=14.88÷2414.88 \div 2.4 = 14.88 \div 24. Only the divisor has changed, so the answer becomes ten times too small. Right: 14.88÷2.4=148.8÷2414.88 \div 2.4 = 148.8 \div 24.

Change the total while keeping the divisor from Worked example 8.

Calculating with negative numbers

A negative sign tells you where a number sits; an operation sign tells you what to do. Brackets help keep those jobs separate in a calculation such as 5−(−3)5 - (-3).

Adding 33 moves right on a number line; adding −3-3 moves left. Subtracting reverses the move you would make when adding that number. Thus subtracting −3-3 moves right, while subtracting 33 moves left.

[DIAGRAM: asset_name: Adding and subtracting a negative; asset_slug: aqa8300_n02_signed_moves; caption: From 2, adding minus 5 moves left to minus 3, while subtracting minus 5 moves right to 7; description: Two number lines from minus 4 to 8. The top line has a blue starting point at 2 and a left arrow labelled add minus 5 ending at minus 3. The lower line has a blue starting point at 2 and a right arrow labelled subtract minus 5 ending at 7. Endpoints are clay, with zero labelled on both lines.]
From 2, adding minus 5 moves left to minus 3, while subtracting minus 5 moves right to 7

For multiplication, 3×(−4)=−123 \times (-4) = -12: three lots of −4-4. Reversing the sign of either factor reverses the product, so (−3)×(−4)=12(-3) \times (-4) = 12. Division follows the same rule because its answer must multiply back correctly.

Sign rules

For positive numbers aa and bb,

a+(−b)=a−ba−(−b)=a+b\begin{aligned} a + (-b) &= a-b\\ a - (-b) &= a+b \end{aligned}

For multiplication and division with non-zero numbers, matching signs give a positive answer; different signs give a negative answer. Multiplying zero by any number gives zero. Zero divided by a non-zero number is zero; division by zero is undefined.

Not on the formulae sheet: learn it.

Do the sign decision separately from the whole-number or decimal arithmetic.

Worked example 9: adding a negative decimal

Question. Work out −3.6+(−1.8)-3.6 + (-1.8). Non-calculator.

Plan. Add the two distances from zero, then use the direction of the moves.

3.6+1.8=5.4combine the distances−3.6+(−1.8)=−5.4both moves are left\begin{aligned} 3.6 + 1.8 &= 5.4 && \text{combine the distances}\\ -3.6 + (-1.8) &= -5.4 && \text{both moves are left} \end{aligned}

Why is the answer negative? Starting below zero and moving further left cannot take you above zero.

Answer. −5.4-5.4.

Check. Moving right by 1.81.8 from −5.4-5.4 returns to −3.6-3.6.

Worked example 10 changes only the operation: subtract the same negative number. That reverses its direction.

Worked example 10: subtracting a negative decimal

Question. Work out −3.6−(−1.8)-3.6 - (-1.8). Non-calculator.

Plan. Replace subtracting a negative by adding its positive opposite.

−3.6−(−1.8)=−3.6+1.8reverse the negative move=−1.8move right by 1.8\begin{aligned} -3.6 - (-1.8) &= -3.6 + 1.8 && \text{reverse the negative move}\\ &= -1.8 && \text{move right by }1.8 \end{aligned}

Why does the answer stay negative? The move right is smaller than the starting distance below zero.

Answer. −1.8-1.8.

Check. −1.8+(−1.8)=−3.6-1.8 + (-1.8) = -3.6; adding back the subtracted number restores the start.

For the other two operations, decide the sign and then use the written methods already taught. For instance, (−2.4)×3=−7.2(-2.4) \times 3 = -7.2, because the signs differ, while (−7.2)÷(−3)=2.4(-7.2) \div (-3) = 2.4, because they match. The check is 2.4×(−3)=−7.22.4 \times (-3) = -7.2.

Watch out

“Two negatives make a positive” applies to multiplication and division, not to every calculation containing two minus signs. Wrong: −3+(−5)=8-3 + (-5) = 8. Right: −3+(−5)=−8-3 + (-5) = -8, but (−3)×(−5)=15(-3) \times (-5) = 15.

The next check separates the operations so that the rule you choose is visible.

Profit, loss and account balances

A money problem needs the right operations as well as correct arithmetic. Read each amount as money coming in, money going out or money already held.

The cost price is what an item costs the seller. The selling price is what the customer pays. A profit is the excess of selling price over cost price; a loss is the excess of cost price over selling price. On an account, a credit adds money and a debit takes money out. The balance is the amount held; a negative balance means money is owed.

These definitions let you keep a running total. Income tax and VAT are types of tax; an interest rate sets how interest is calculated over a stated period. Here any tax or interest amount needed is already given. Percentage calculations come later.

Profit and closing balance

profit=selling price−cost pricewhen selling price is greaterclosing balance=opening balance+credits−debits\begin{aligned} \text{profit} &= \text{selling price}-\text{cost price} && \text{when selling price is greater}\\ \text{closing balance} &= \text{opening balance}+\text{credits}-\text{debits} \end{aligned}

Use the same money unit throughout. If the selling price is smaller than the cost price, the loss is cost price minus selling price.

Not on the formulae sheet: learn it.

Track a positive balance first, then change only its starting sign.

Worked example 11: a positive opening balance

Question. An account contains £18.40. A payment of £35.75 is credited and £42.60 is debited. Work out the closing balance. Non-calculator.

Plan. Add the credit to the opening balance, then subtract the debit.

18.40+35.75=54.15money available after credit54.15−42.60=11.55money left after debit\begin{aligned} 18.40+35.75 &=54.15 && \text{money available after credit}\\ 54.15-42.60 &=11.55 && \text{money left after debit} \end{aligned}

Why subtract £42.60? A debit is money leaving the account, even though the amount is written without a negative sign.

Answer. £11.55.

Check. The net change is 35.75−42.60=−6.8535.75-42.60=-6.85; reducing £18.40 by £6.85 gives £11.55.

The next example changes only the opening balance: the account starts £18.40 below zero. Keep that negative sign throughout.

Worked example 12: an overdrawn opening balance

Question. An account has balance −£18.40-£18.40. A payment of £35.75 is credited and £42.60 is debited. Work out the closing balance. Non-calculator.

Plan. Use the same changes, starting from a negative amount.

−18.40+35.75=17.35credit clears the debt17.35−42.60=−25.25debit takes balance below zero\begin{aligned} -18.40+35.75 &=17.35 && \text{credit clears the debt}\\ 17.35-42.60 &=-25.25 && \text{debit takes balance below zero} \end{aligned}

Why keep the initial minus sign? £18.40 owed and £18.40 held are different starting positions.

Answer. −£25.25-£25.25; the account is £25.25 overdrawn.

Check. The net change is still −£6.85-£6.85. Starting at −£18.40-£18.40 gives −£25.25-£25.25.

Now return to the school stall. Its profit is £186.75−£128.90=£57.85£186.75-£128.90=£57.85. Adding that to its opening debt gives −£24.60+£57.85=£33.25-£24.60+£57.85=£33.25. The account does finish above zero. Notice that its profit and its closing balance are different amounts.

Here is a small arithmetic surprise: 12×12=14412 \times 12 = 144 and 21×21=44121 \times 21 = 441. Reversing the digits reverses these products too. That pattern fails for 14×14=19614 \times 14 = 196 and 41×41=168141 \times 41 = 1681: the reversed digits would give 691691. Written methods let you test an attractive pattern before trusting it.

Watch out

A negative balance is not the same as a loss. The stall makes a £57.85 profit but uses £24.60 of it to clear an old debt. Its final £33.25 balance is not its profit for the day.

For a context question, finish with the amount the question actually asks for.

Quick Recap

  • For addition and subtraction, line up place-value columns and exchange without changing a number's value.
  • For multiplication, include the tens value of each partial-product row; for decimals, undo every scale change.
  • For division, carry remainders into the next column and scale both numbers together to remove a decimal divisor.
  • For negative numbers, distinguish addition or subtraction from the matching-sign rule for multiplication or division.
  • Profit compares income with costs; closing balance also includes the starting amount.

The stall finishes £33.25 above zero: its £57.85 profit first clears its £24.60 debt.