A6 - Algebraic arguments and proof

A6 - Algebraic arguments and proof

Algebra lets you explain why a pattern works, rather than just check a few examples. You will distinguish equations from identities, show that expressions are equivalent, and use algebra to test claims. The final Higher part builds complete proofs about whole numbers.

Equations and identities

Think of a number, multiply it by 55, add 1515, divide by 55, then subtract your starting number. Will everyone get 33? Trying a few numbers gives a clue. Algebra will settle the question for every starting number at once.

You already know

An expression, such as 3x+63x+6, has no equality sign. Expanding a bracket multiplies every term inside: 3(x+2)=3x+63(x+2)=3x+6.

Compare x+3=7x+3=7 with 3(x+2)=3x+63(x+2)=3x+6. The first is true at x=4x=4, but false at x=5x=5. The second is true for every value of xx: both sides perform the same calculation in different forms.

Equation and identity

An equation states that two expressions are equal. It may be true for some values, all values, or no values of its variables. An identity is an equation true for every allowed value of its variables.

For example, 3(x+2)≡3x+63(x+2)\equiv3x+6 is an identity. The symbol ≡\equiv emphasises that it is always true. The equation x+3=7x+3=7 is not an identity.

“Allowed” matters when a denominator is present. An identity involving 1/x1/x cannot include x=0x=0. For ordinary polynomial expressions, every real value of xx is allowed. These definitions and the identity symbol are not on the formulae sheet: learn them.

Key idea

An identity describes the same value in two forms. Solving an equation asks which values make it true; showing an identity asks why it is true for every allowed value.

Even a long run of examples can fool you. The expression n2+n+41n^2+n+41 gives a prime for every whole number nn from 00 to 3939. Yet at n=40n=40, it gives 1681=4121681=41^2, which is not prime. Forty successes do not prove the next case.

Showing expressions are equivalent

To show that two expressions are equivalent, transform one into the other using valid algebra. You can also simplify them separately until they have exactly the same form.

Equivalent means equal for every allowed value. Substituting one value gives a check, but it does not show that the expressions agree for all the others.

Equivalent expressions

Expressions with the same value for every allowed value of their variables. For example, 4x+84x+8 and 4(x+2)4(x+2) are equivalent. The expressions x+2x+2 and 2x2x agree at x=2x=2, but are not equivalent.

The expansion and collection rules used here are not on the formulae sheet: learn them. In a “Show that” question, write the algebraic steps even though the answer is supplied. Both examples are non-calculator.

Worked example 1: addition outside a bracket

Question. Show that 3(x+4)+2x3(x+4)+2x is equivalent to 5x+125x+12.

Plan. Expand the bracket, then collect the terms containing xx.

3(x+4)+2x=3x+12+2xmultiply both bracket terms=5x+12collect like terms\begin{aligned} 3(x+4)+2x&=3x+12+2x&&\text{multiply both bracket terms}\\ &=5x+12&&\text{collect like terms} \end{aligned}

Why this step? Expansion exposes the two xx-terms, which can then be combined. No particular value of xx has been chosen.

Answer. Both expressions are equal for every xx, so they are equivalent.

Check. At x=2x=2, the original gives 18+4=2218+4=22, and 5x+125x+12 also gives 2222.

Change only the operation before 2x2x to subtraction. Collect with its sign attached.

Worked example 2: subtraction outside a bracket

Question. Show that 3(x+4)−2x3(x+4)-2x is equivalent to x+12x+12.

Plan. Expand, then subtract the like terms.

3(x+4)−2x=3x+12−2xexpand the bracket=x+12combine 3x−2x\begin{aligned} 3(x+4)-2x&=3x+12-2x&&\text{expand the bracket}\\ &=x+12&&\text{combine }3x-2x \end{aligned}

Why this step? The minus belongs to the 2x2x-term. It remains a subtraction after the bracket is expanded.

Answer. The expressions are equivalent for every xx.

Check. At x=2x=2, 18−4=1418-4=14, agreeing with 2+12=142+12=14.

Equivalence is about the complete expressions. Expanding only part of a bracket can create a plausible-looking but different expression.

Watch out

Wrong: 4(x+3)=4x+34(x+3)=4x+3. The factor 44 multiplies both terms. Right: 4(x+3)=4x+124(x+3)=4x+12. At x=0x=0, the wrong expression gives 33 instead of 1212.

Change the multiplier and show every step of the same argument.

Using algebra to test a claim

Choose a letter for the starting number and follow the instructions exactly. A simplified result can explain whether the starting number still matters.

Let the starting number be nn. Multiplying it by 22 gives 2n2n; adding 66 gives 2n+62n+6. If the next step divides the result by 22, it divides that whole expression.

Dividing a sum

an+ba=n+ba(a≠0)\frac{an+b}{a}=n+\frac ba\qquad(a\ne0)

The denominator divides both terms in the numerator.

Not on the formulae sheet: learn it.

These non-calculator examples turn number instructions into an algebraic argument.

Worked example 3: a fixed result

Question. A number is multiplied by 22, then 66 is added. The result is divided by 22, then the starting number is subtracted. Sam says the answer is always 33. Use algebra to show that Sam is correct.

Plan. Call the starting number nn and simplify the complete calculation.

2n+62−n=n+3−ndivide both numerator terms=3the n-terms cancel\begin{aligned} \frac{2n+6}{2}-n&=n+3-n&&\text{divide both numerator terms}\\ &=3&&\text{the }n\text{-terms cancel} \end{aligned}

Why this step? The letter represents any starting number. Once it cancels, the result cannot depend on which number was chosen.

Answer. Sam is correct: the result is always 33.

Check. Starting with 44 gives (8+6)/2−4=7−4=3(8+6)/2-4=7-4=3.

Now change the multiplier and matching divisor from 22 to 33. Keep the added number 66, and see which fixed result survives.

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account