N14, N15 - Rounding, significant figures and estimation

N14, N15 - Rounding, significant figures and estimation

An answer can be accurate without needing every digit. N15 shows you how to round to decimal places or significant figures and choose sensible accuracy in a context. N14 uses these simpler numbers to estimate calculations and check whether an answer, including a calculator answer, makes sense.

Rounding to a place value

A group needs seats for 7373 people. Each minibus seats 1616. Will ordinary rounding always tell you how many minibuses to book? Keep that question in mind while we first learn what rounding actually does.

You already know

Place value tells you the value of each digit. The first two columns after the decimal point are tenths and hundredths; 6.2=6.206.2=6.20.

The number 4.234.23 lies between 4.24.2 and 4.34.3. It is closer to 4.24.2, so 4.234.23 rounded to one decimal place is 4.24.2. Their midpoint is 4.254.25. Values below the midpoint round to 4.24.2; for positive numbers, the midpoint and values above it round to 4.34.3.

[DIAGRAM: asset_name: Rounding to the nearest tenth; asset_slug: aqa8300_n14_rounding_midpoint; caption: The midpoint 4.25 decides whether a positive number rounds to 4.2 or 4.3; description: A number line from 4.20 to 4.30 has a labelled midpoint at 4.25. A blue point marks 4.23 to the left of the midpoint. Pale blue and clay bands distinguish the two halves, with arrows indicating rounding towards 4.2 and 4.3 respectively. The labels show 4.23 rounds to 4.2 and 4.25 rounds to 4.3.]
The midpoint 4.25 decides whether a positive number rounds to 4.2 or 4.3

Decimal places

The number of digits written after the decimal point. For example, 6.256.25 has two decimal places and 6.306.30 also has two. The final zero in 6.306.30 shows the requested accuracy.

To round, identify the last place you want to keep. Look at the next digit. A digit from 00 to 44 leaves the kept digit unchanged; a digit from 55 to 99 increases it by one. Remove digits to the right of the required decimal place. For whole numbers rounded to tens, hundreds or thousands, replace the discarded digits with zeros to preserve place value.

For instance, 684684 to the nearest hundred is 700700, not 77. With negative numbers, think of the nearest point on the number line: −3.26-3.26 is closer to −3.3-3.3 than to −3.2-3.2.

Rounding to the nearest place

The gap between successive rounded values is the rounding unit. Round to the nearest multiple of that unit; halfway positive values round to the higher multiple.

nearest 10:unit 101 decimal place:unit 0.12 decimal places:unit 0.01\begin{aligned} \text{nearest }10&:\quad \text{unit }10\\ 1\text{ decimal place}&:\quad \text{unit }0.1\\ 2\text{ decimal places}&:\quad \text{unit }0.01 \end{aligned}

The requested place determines the unit, not the length of the original number.

Not on the formulae sheet: learn it.

Keep the hundredths column in the following example.

Worked example 1: rounding a decimal

Question. Write 6.2476.247 correct to 22 decimal places. Non-calculator.

Plan. Keep the hundredths and inspect the thousandths.

6.247 has hundredths digit 4last place to keepnext digit=7round the hundredths up6.247≈6.25write two decimal places\begin{aligned} 6.247&\text{ has hundredths digit }4 &&\text{last place to keep}\\ \text{next digit}&=7 &&\text{round the hundredths up}\\ 6.247&\approx6.25 &&\text{write two decimal places} \end{aligned}

Why use the 77? It tells us the value is more than halfway from 6.246.24 to 6.256.25.

Answer. 6.256.25.

Check. The distances are 0.0030.003 to 6.256.25 and 0.0070.007 to 6.246.24.

Now change the kept digit to 99. Rounding up must carry into the next column.

Worked example 2: carrying when rounding

Question. Write 6.2976.297 correct to 22 decimal places. Non-calculator.

Plan. Round up the hundredths, carrying when 99 increases by one.

next digit=7round upwards6.29+0.01=6.30carry into the tenths6.297≈6.30keep two decimal places\begin{aligned} \text{next digit}&=7 &&\text{round upwards}\\ 6.29+0.01&=6.30 &&\text{carry into the tenths}\\ 6.297&\approx6.30 &&\text{keep two decimal places} \end{aligned}

Why keep the final zero? The question asks for two decimal places, so the hundredths column must be shown.

Answer. 6.306.30.

Check. 6.2976.297 is only 0.0030.003 below 6.3006.300.

The first discarded digit makes the rounding decision; the rest cannot reverse it.

Watch out

Wrong: 6.297≈6.36.297\approx6.3 to two decimal places. The value is right but the requested written accuracy is missing. Right: 6.306.30.

Use the same carrying idea with a new number.

Rounding to significant figures

Significant figures count from the first non-zero digit, wherever the decimal point sits.

In 0.004070.00407, the first significant digit is 44. The zeros before it only locate the number on the place-value scale. The zero between 44 and 77 counts, so this number has three significant figures. In 4.0704.070, the final zero also counts because it is written after the decimal point to show accuracy.

Significant figures

The important digits counted from the first non-zero digit. Zeros between significant digits count, and trailing decimal zeros show accuracy. For example, 0.0520.052 has two significant figures: 55 and 22. Its leading zeros do not count.

After finding the last significant digit you want, use the next digit to decide whether to round up. Keep place value: rounding 47 26147\,261 to two significant figures still gives a number in the tens of thousands. This rule is not on the formulae sheet: learn it.

Worked example 3: a large number

Question. Write 47 26147\,261 correct to 22 significant figures. Non-calculator.

Plan. Keep the 44 and 77; inspect the next digit and preserve the number's size.

first two significant digits=4, 7ten thousands and thousandsnext digit=2leave the thousands unchanged47 261≈47 000replace lower places by zeros\begin{aligned} \text{first two significant digits}&=4,\ 7 &&\text{ten thousands and thousands}\\ \text{next digit}&=2 &&\text{leave the thousands unchanged}\\ 47\,261&\approx47\,000 &&\text{replace lower places by zeros} \end{aligned}

Why write three zeros? They keep 4747 in the thousands; 4747 alone is far too small.

Answer. 47 00047\,000.

Check. 47 26147\,261 is closer to 47 00047\,000 than to 48 00048\,000.

The next example changes only the scale: the same digits appear in a small decimal. Start counting at the same 44.

Worked example 4: a small decimal

Question. Write 0.00472610.0047261 correct to 22 significant figures. Non-calculator.

Plan. Ignore the leading zeros when counting significant figures.

first two significant digits=4, 7start at the first non-zero digitnext digit=2do not round up0.0047261≈0.0047retain the leading zeros\begin{aligned} \text{first two significant digits}&=4,\ 7 &&\text{start at the first non-zero digit}\\ \text{next digit}&=2 &&\text{do not round up}\\ 0.0047261&\approx0.0047 &&\text{retain the leading zeros} \end{aligned}

Why keep the leading zeros? They locate the 44 in the thousandths column, although they are not significant figures.

Answer. 0.00470.0047.

Check. 0.00470.0047 has two significant figures but four decimal places.

Decimal places and significant figures answer different questions.

Watch out

Wrong: 0.0047261≈0.000.0047261\approx0.00 to two significant figures. That is rounding to two decimal places. Right: begin at the 44, giving 0.00470.0047. Rounding can also carry: 9.969.96 to two significant figures is 1010, stated to two significant figures.

For this check, the next digit now causes an increase.

Estimating and checking calculations

An estimate makes a calculation simple enough to check its size without a calculator.

You already know

Round to one significant figure by keeping the first non-zero digit. Follow the order of operations: powers before multiplication, and multiplication before addition.

For an exam question that says “By rounding each number to one significant figure”, show those rounded numbers. Keep the operations unchanged. In particular, rounding a number inside a power does not remove its exponent. This estimation method is not on the formulae sheet: learn it.

Worked example 5: an estimate with a square

Question. By rounding each number to 11 significant figure, estimate 19.6×4.8+6.9219.6\times4.8+6.9^2. Non-calculator.

Plan. Round the three numbers, then follow the original order of operations.

19.6≈204.8≈56.9≈7one significant figure each19.6×4.8+6.92≈20×5+72retain the square=100+49=149multiply and square first\begin{aligned} 19.6&\approx20\quad 4.8\approx5\quad 6.9\approx7 &&\text{one significant figure each}\\ 19.6\times4.8+6.9^2&\approx20\times5+7^2 &&\text{retain the square}\\ &=100+49=149 &&\text{multiply and square first} \end{aligned}

Why retain 727^2? The question still asks for a square; only its base has been approximated.

Answer. An estimate is 149149. It is an overestimate: all three positive numbers were rounded upwards, increasing both terms.

Check. Both terms are positive, so a result smaller than 100100 would not fit these rounded values.

Change the square to a cube. That single symbol makes a large difference to the estimate.

Worked example 6: an estimate with a cube

Question. By rounding each number to 11 significant figure, estimate 19.6×4.8+6.9319.6\times4.8+6.9^3. Non-calculator.

Plan. Use the same rounded bases but cube 77 this time.

19.6×4.8+6.93≈20×5+73same rounding, new exponent=100+343evaluate the cube=443add the terms\begin{aligned} 19.6\times4.8+6.9^3&\approx20\times5+7^3 &&\text{same rounding, new exponent}\\ &=100+343 &&\text{evaluate the cube}\\ &=443 &&\text{add the terms} \end{aligned}

Why not 149149 again? 73=7×7×77^3=7\times7\times7, whereas 727^2 uses only two factors.

Answer. An estimate is 443443, again an overestimate.

Check. 737^3 is between 300300 and 400400, so the whole estimate should be between 400400 and 500500.

An overestimate is greater than the exact value; an underestimate is smaller. For positive quantities, increasing a numerator increases a quotient, but increasing its denominator decreases it. When some rounding changes pull in opposite directions, do not guess which effect wins.

Watch out

Wrong: round only the final calculator answer when the question asks for an estimate using rounded inputs. Right: show the simpler input numbers and calculate with them. Use ≈\approx between an exact expression and its estimate, not ==.

Estimation also checks technology. The exact first expression is 141.69141.69; a display of 1416.91416.9 is far too large compared with 149149. Check the entered expression, brackets and decimal points. A result near the estimate is plausible, but that alone does not prove every key was correct. A quick estimate for 38.7÷0.4938.7\div0.49, for example, is 40÷0.5=8040\div0.5=80, so a calculator answer near 88 needs checking.

Choosing accuracy in context

The context decides whether an ordinary nearest-value answer is useful.

For money, a final price in pounds normally needs two decimal places. For whole objects, ask whether you need enough capacity or only complete groups. A fractional vehicle is not something you can book.

Worked example 7: enough seats

Question. Each minibus seats 1616 people. Work out the least number of minibuses needed for 7373 people. Calculator allowed.

Plan. Divide to find the number of full vehicle loads, then allow for the remaining people.

73÷16=4.5625calculator expression and display4×16=64four minibuses leave people out5×16=80five provide enough seats\begin{aligned} 73\div16&=4.5625 &&\text{calculator expression and display}\\ 4\times16&=64 &&\text{four minibuses leave people out}\\ 5\times16&=80 &&\text{five provide enough seats} \end{aligned}

Why round up? You need seats for every person, including those in the last partly filled minibus.

Answer. 55 minibuses.

Check. 64<73⩽8064<73\leqslant80, so four are insufficient and five are enough.

Now change the demand from enough capacity to complete groups. The quotient stays the same; the direction of rounding changes.

Worked example 8: complete teams

Question. There are 7373 players. Each full team needs 1616 players. Work out the greatest number of full teams. Calculator allowed.

Plan. Divide, then count only the complete teams.

73÷16=4.5625calculator display4×16=64four full teams73−64=9not enough for another team\begin{aligned} 73\div16&=4.5625 &&\text{calculator display}\\ 4\times16&=64 &&\text{four full teams}\\ 73-64&=9 &&\text{not enough for another team} \end{aligned}

Why round down? A partly filled team does not meet the question's condition.

Answer. 44 full teams.

Check. Five teams need 8080 players, more than are available.

Even when ordinary rounding is appropriate, do it once at the end. A surprising trap is that 2.4492.449 rounds directly to 2.42.4 at one decimal place, but rounding first to 2.452.45, then to one decimal place, gives 2.52.5. The first rounding has changed the later decision.

Watch out

Wrong: round 8÷38\div3 to 2.672.67, then multiply by 77 to get 18.6918.69. Right: keep 8÷38\div3 unrounded, so (8÷3)×7=18.666…(8\div3)\times7=18.666\ldots, which rounds to 18.6718.67 at two decimal places. On a calculator, keep the value in memory or use the whole expression.

The opening minibus answer happens to agree with rounding 4.56254.5625 to the nearest integer. That is a coincidence: if the quotient had been 4.14.1, enough seats would still require five vehicles. Read what the answer has to achieve.

Quick Recap

  • Decimal places count from the decimal point; significant figures count from the first non-zero digit.
  • Keep the number's place value and show final decimal zeros when needed for the requested accuracy.
  • Estimate with simple inputs, keeping the original operations, then use the result to check the size of an answer.
  • Keep intermediate values unrounded and round the final result once.
  • In context, enough capacity may require rounding up; complete groups may require rounding down.

The group must book 55 minibuses: ordinary rounding is not the rule that guarantees enough seats.