5.1 - Vector geometry and proofs

5.1 - Vector geometry and proofs

Use directed routes and scalar multiples to prove relationships between points and lines. You will find vectors to points dividing sides, prove parallelism and collinearity, and use a multiplier to recover a length ratio.

Routes and points on a side (Higher)

Do two medians of a triangle always meet two thirds of the way from each vertex? A neat drawing suggests they might, but one drawing cannot prove a statement about every triangle. We will build a proof from directed movements.

You already know

A backwards arrow changes sign. Vectors add along a joined route. In a ratio 2:32:3, the whole has 5 equal parts, so the first part is 25\frac25 of the whole.

Begin with a concrete route. If OA→=(60)\overrightarrow{OA}=\begin{pmatrix}6\\0\end{pmatrix} and OB→=(15)\overrightarrow{OB}=\begin{pmatrix}1\\5\end{pmatrix}, going from AA back to OO, then on to BB, gives AB→=(−55)\overrightarrow{AB}=\begin{pmatrix}-5\\5\end{pmatrix}. We can use exactly the same reasoning with letters, so the result applies to many triangles at once.

Position vector

The position vector of PP, relative to origin OO, is OP→\overrightarrow{OP}. If OA→=a\overrightarrow{OA}=\mathbf a and OB→=b\overrightarrow{OB}=\mathbf b, then AB→=b−a\overrightarrow{AB}=\mathbf b-\mathbf a.

Write a route before simplifying. The endpoint letters help you see whether each arrow goes forwards or backwards. If PP is on ABAB, its position vector is the route OO to AA to PP.

Internal division of a side

If AP:PB=m:nAP:PB=m:n, with m,n>0m,n>0, then

OP→=a+mm+n(b−a)\overrightarrow{OP}=\mathbf a+\frac{m}{m+n}(\mathbf b-\mathbf a)

The fraction multiplies AB→\overrightarrow{AB}, not OB→\overrightarrow{OB}. Not in the Higher formulae sheet: learn the route method.

A midpoint is the simplest internal division, using one half of the side from each end.

Worked example 1: a midpoint position vector

Question. OA→=a\overrightarrow{OA}=\mathbf a, OB→=b\overrightarrow{OB}=\mathbf b, and MM is the midpoint of ABAB. Find OM→\overrightarrow{OM}.

Plan. Go to AA, then travel half of ABAB.

AB→=b−aroute through OOM→=a+12(b−a)halfway along AB=12a+12bcollect terms\begin{aligned} \overrightarrow{AB}&=\mathbf b-\mathbf a &&\text{route through }O\\ \overrightarrow{OM}&=\mathbf a+\tfrac12(\mathbf b-\mathbf a) &&\text{halfway along }AB\\ &=\tfrac12\mathbf a+\tfrac12\mathbf b &&\text{collect terms} \end{aligned}

Why add a\mathbf a? The half-side movement starts at AA, whereas the position vector starts at OO.

Answer. OM→=12(a+b)\overrightarrow{OM}=\frac12(\mathbf a+\mathbf b).

Check. Starting from BB gives b+12(a−b)\mathbf b+\frac12(\mathbf a-\mathbf b), the same expression.

Change only the division ratio from 1:11:1 to 1:21:2. The route is unchanged, but its side fraction becomes 13\frac13.

Worked example 2: unequal division

Question. For the same endpoint vectors, PP lies on ABAB with AP:PB=1:2AP:PB=1:2. Find OP→\overrightarrow{OP}.

Plan. Travel one third of ABAB after reaching AA.

AP→=13(b−a)one part out of threeOP→=a+13(b−a)join the route=23a+13bcollect terms\begin{aligned} \overrightarrow{AP}&=\tfrac13(\mathbf b-\mathbf a) &&\text{one part out of three}\\ \overrightarrow{OP}&=\mathbf a+\tfrac13(\mathbf b-\mathbf a) &&\text{join the route}\\ &=\tfrac23\mathbf a+\tfrac13\mathbf b &&\text{collect terms} \end{aligned}

Why not 12\frac12? The ratio compares two pieces; the required fraction compares the first piece with the whole.

Answer. OP→=23a+13b\overrightarrow{OP}=\frac23\mathbf a+\frac13\mathbf b.

Check. PB→=b−OP→=23(b−a)=2AP→\overrightarrow{PB}=\mathbf b-\overrightarrow{OP}=\frac23(\mathbf b-\mathbf a)=2\overrightarrow{AP}.

For an internal point, the coefficients of a\mathbf a and b\mathbf b are positive and add to 1. This is a useful algebra check, though it does not replace the route.

Watch out

For AP:PB=1:2AP:PB=1:2, the line AP→=12AB→\overrightarrow{AP}=\frac12\overrightarrow{AB} incorrectly uses the ratio as a fraction of the whole. Use 11+2=13\frac1{1+2}=\frac13.

Change the ratio again, keeping the same two endpoint position vectors.

Proving lines parallel (Higher)

Two nonzero arrows with the same direction, or opposite directions, have parallel supporting lines. The algebraic test is that one vector is a scalar multiple of the other. Equal lengths alone are insufficient: an eastward arrow and a northward arrow may have equal lengths.

Parallel vectors

Nonzero vectors u\mathbf u and v\mathbf v are parallel if u=kv\mathbf u=k\mathbf v for a nonzero scalar kk. The sign tells you whether their directions agree or oppose.

A proof must find both directed vectors, show the multiple and state the geometrical conclusion. No vector-proof rule is supplied in the Higher formulae sheet. Keep a useful bracket such as b−a\mathbf b-\mathbf a together so the multiple is visible.

Worked example 3: the midpoint theorem

Question. In a nondegenerate triangle ABCABC, let AB→=a\overrightarrow{AB}=\mathbf a and AC→=b\overrightarrow{AC}=\mathbf b. Points PP and QQ are the midpoints of ABAB and ACAC. Prove PQ∥BCPQ\parallel BC and find the length ratio PQ:BCPQ:BC.

Plan. Compare the routes PP to AA to QQ, and BB to AA to CC.

PQ→=−12a+12bback to A, then to Q=12(b−a)factoriseBC→=−a+broute through APQ→=12BC→compare\begin{aligned} \overrightarrow{PQ}&=-\tfrac12\mathbf a+\tfrac12\mathbf b &&\text{back to }A\text{, then to }Q\\ &=\tfrac12(\mathbf b-\mathbf a) &&\text{factorise}\\ \overrightarrow{BC}&=-\mathbf a+\mathbf b &&\text{route through }A\\ \overrightarrow{PQ}&=\tfrac12\overrightarrow{BC} &&\text{compare} \end{aligned}

Why are these vectors nonzero? A nondegenerate triangle has distinct vertices and noncollinear sides, so b−a≠0\mathbf b-\mathbf a\ne\mathbf0.

Answer. The vectors are nonzero scalar multiples, so PQ∥BCPQ\parallel BC, with PQ:BC=1:2PQ:BC=1:2.

Check. Both points are halfway along their sides, so the common factor 12\frac12 fits both side movements. The proof used arbitrary a,b\mathbf a,\mathbf b, so it applies to every such triangle.

Change only the common fraction along the two sides: each point is now one third of the way from AA. The same proof should adapt without assuming a special triangle.

Worked example 4: equal fractions along two sides

Question. In the same general triangle, let AP=13ABAP=\frac13 AB and AQ=13ACAQ=\frac13 AC, with PP and QQ on those sides. Prove PQ∥BCPQ\parallel BC and find PQ:BCPQ:BC.

Plan. Use the same two routes with the new common fraction.

PQ→=−13a+13broute P to A to Q=13(b−a)factorise=13BC→use BC→=b−a\begin{aligned} \overrightarrow{PQ}&=-\tfrac13\mathbf a+\tfrac13\mathbf b &&\text{route }P\text{ to }A\text{ to }Q\\ &=\tfrac13(\mathbf b-\mathbf a) &&\text{factorise}\\ &=\tfrac13\overrightarrow{BC} &&\text{use }\overrightarrow{BC}=\mathbf b-\mathbf a \end{aligned}

Why does equal fraction matter? It produces one common factor multiplying the entire side vector.

Answer. PQ∥BCPQ\parallel BC and PQ:BC=1:3PQ:BC=1:3, since the compared nonzero vectors have multiplier 13\frac13.

Check. Reversing both arrows gives QP→=13CB→\overrightarrow{QP}=\frac13\overrightarrow{CB}, the same relationship.

If the fractions along the two sides differ, you cannot simply claim the join is parallel. You must calculate and compare its vector.

Continue this lesson.

You’re previewing NovaLearn without an account. Create a free account to read the rest.

Create free account